The main goal of this research was to develop and present a general, efficient, mathematical, and theoretical based methodology to model nonlinear forced-vibrating mechanical systems from time series measurements. A system identification modeling methodology for forced dynamical systems is presented based on a dynamic system theory and a nonlinear time series analysis that employ phase space reconstruction (delay vector embedding) in modeling dynamical systems from time series data using time-delay neural networks. The first part of this work details the modeling methodology, including background on dynamic systems, phase space reconstruction, and neural networks. In the second part of this work, the methodology is evaluated based on its ability to model selected analytical lumped-parameter forced-vibrating dynamic systems, including an example of a linear system predicting lumped mass displacement subjected to a displacement forcing function. The work discusses the application to nonlinear systems, multiple degree of freedom systems, and multiple input systems. The methodology is further evaluated on its ability to model an analytical passenger rail car predicting vertical wheel∕rail force using a measured vertical rail profile as the input function. Studying the neural modeling methodology using analytical systems shows the clearest observations from results, providing prospective users of this tool an understanding of the expectations and limitations of the modeling methodology.

1.
Masulli
,
F.
,
Parenti
,
R.
, and
Studer
,
L.
, 1999, “
Neural Modeling of Non-Linear Processes: Relevance of the Takens–Mañé Theorem
,”
International Journal of Chaos Theory and Applications
,
4
(
2–3
), pp.
59
74
.
2.
Chow
,
T. W.
, and
Shuai
,
O.
, 1997, “
Feedforward Neural Networks Based Input-Output Models for Railway Carriage System Identification
,”
Neural Processing Letters
,
4
, pp.
127
137
.
3.
Choromanski
,
W.
, 1996, “
Application of Neural Networks for Intelligent Wheelset and Railway Vehicle Suspension Design
,”
Veh. Syst. Dyn.
0042-3114,
25
, pp.
87
88
.
4.
Gajdar
,
T.
,
Rudas
,
I.
, and
Suda
,
Y.
, 1997, “
Neural Network Based Estimation of Friction Coefficient of Wheel and Rail
,”
International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems
,
Budapest, Hungary
, Sept. 15–17.
5.
Cook
,
A.
, 1998, “
Intelligent Rail Impact Predicting Tool
,” Military Traffic Management Command and Transportation Engineering Agency.
6.
Martinelli
,
D.
, and
Teng
,
H.
, 1996, “
Optimization of Railway Operations Using Neural Networks
,”
Transp. Res., Part C: Emerg. Technol.
0968-090X,
4
, pp.
33
49
.
7.
Horwitz
,
D.
, and
El-Sabaie
,
M.
, 1995, “
Applying Neural Networks to Railway Engineering
,” AI Expert, January.
8.
Carr
,
G.
,
Martin
,
T.
, and
El-Sibaie
,
M.
, 2001, “
Neural Network Based Vehicle Response Prediction from Track Geometry Data
,”
ASME Spring Rail Conference
,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
, April 17–19.
9.
Martin
,
T.
,
Carr
,
G.
, and
El-Sibaie
,
M.
, 2002, “
Application of Neural Network Technology for Predicting Wheel and Rail Interactive Forces
,”
ASME∕IEEE Joint Rail Conference
,
Washington, DC
, April 23–25.
10.
Li
,
D.
,
Salahifar
,
T.
,
Malone
,
J.
, and
Kalay
,
S.
, 2001, “
Development of Performance-Based Track Geometry Inspection
,”
International Heavy Haul Conference
,
Brisbane, Australia
, June 10–13.
11.
Takens
,
F.
, 1981, “
Detecting Strange Attractors in Turbulence
,” 1981,
Dynamical Systems and Turbulence
,
Lecture Notes in Mathematics
Vol.
898
,
D.
Rand
and
L.
Young
, eds.,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
, pp.
366
381
.
12.
Casdagli
,
M.
, 1992, “
A Dynamical Systems Approach to Modeling Input-Output Systems
,”
Nonlinear Modeling and Forecasting: SFI Studies in the Science of Complexity
,
M.
Casdagli
and
S.
Eubank
, eds.,
Addison Wesley
,
New York
, pp.
265
281
.
13.
Stark
,
J.
, 1999, “
Delay Embeddings of Forced Systems: I Deterministic Forcing
,”
J. Nonlinear Sci.
0938-8794,
9
(
3
), pp.
255
332
.
14.
Stark
,
J.
, 2003, “
Delay Embeddings of Forced Systems: II Stochastic Forcing
,”
J. Nonlinear Sci.
0938-8794,
13
(
6
), pp.
519
577
.
15.
Fraiser
,
A.
, and
Swinney
,
H.
, 1986, “
Independent Coordinates for Strange Attractors From Mutual Information
,”
Phys. Rev. A
1050-2947,
33
, pp.
1134
1140
.
16.
Kennel
,
M.
,
Isabelle
,
S.
, 1992, “
Method to Distinguish Possible Chaos from Colored Noise and to Determine Embedding Parameters
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
0031-9007,
70
(
25
), pp.
3111
3118
.
17.
Cao
,
L.
, 1997, “
Practical Methods for Determining the Minimum Embedding Dimension of a Scalar Time Series
,”
Physica D
0167-2789,
110
, pp.
43
50
.
18.
Cao
,
L.
,
Mees
,
A.
,
Judd
,
K.
, and
Froyland
,
G.
, 1998, “
Determining the Minimum Embedding Dimension of Input-Output Time Series Data
,”
Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng.
0218-1274,
8
, pp.
1491
1504
.
19.
Lang
,
K. J.
, and
Hinton
,
G. E.
, 1988, “
The Development of the Time Delay Neural Network Architectures for Speech Recognition
,” Carnegie Mellon University, Technical Report No. CMU-CS-88-152.
20.
Sanberg
,
I. W.
, and
Xu
,
L.
, 1997, “
Uniform Approximation of Multidimensional Myopic Maps
,”
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., I: Fundam. Theory Appl.
1057-7122,
44
(
6
), pp.
646
656
.
21.
Zolock
,
J.
, and
Greif
,
R.
, 2003, “
Application of Time Series Analysis and Neural Networks to the Modeling and Analysis of Forced Vibrating Mechanical Systems
,”
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, Paper No. ASME2003-55519.
22.
Zolock
,
J.
, 2005, “
A Methodology for the Modeling of Forced Dynamical Systems From Time Series Measurements Using Time-Delay Neural Networks
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University.
23.
Bing
,
A.
,
Berry
,
S.
,
Henderson
,
H.
, 1995, “
Engineering Data on Selected North American Railroad Passenger Cars and Trucks
,” Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration, Report No. DOT-TSC-FRA-95-5.
You do not currently have access to this content.