The concept of self-identification and its feasibility are experimentally investigated. The modal parameters changed by the variable inertia systems, which are controlled by control input, are used to obtain linear equations about unknown structural parameters to overcome the lack of modes in vibration testing. We derive the controllability of the modal parameters as the requested conditions for implementing self-identification using sensitivity analyses of the modal parameters with respect to the control input. Also, a criterion for the self-identification is proposed to measure the controllability. To examine the present method, the self-identification experiments are performed using a flexible cantilevered beam with controllable additional mass attached to the beam. In the experiments, we simulate the self-identification of a flexible structure with variable inertia systems, where lower vibration modes are changed by the variable inertia system adapting to the lack of modes in identification of unknown parameters. It is shown that the identification error of the bending stiffness and mass per unit length of the beam are ranging from about 8% to 12% and 1% to 7%, respectively, and they depend on the mode number because the mode shape estimation from strain sensors and cubic spline interpolation also depends on the mode. Furthermore, the factor for the identification error is discussed in detail through numerical analysis, and the results show the clear relationship between the present criterion and the identification accuracy in experiments.

1.
Nalitolela
,
N. G.
,
Penny
,
J. E.
, and
Friswell
,
M. I.
, 1992, “
A Mass or Stiffness Addition Technique for Structural Parameter Updating
,”
Int. J. Anal. Exp. Modal Anal.
0886-9367,
7
, pp.
157
168
.
2.
Friswell
,
M. I.
, and
Mottershead
,
J. E.
, 1995,
Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics
,
Kluwer Academic
,
Dordrecht
, Chaps. 5 and 8, pp.
78
97
.
3.
Cha
,
P. D.
, and
Gu
,
W.
, 2000, “
Model Updating Using an Incomplete Set of Experimental Modes
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
234
, pp.
587
600
.
4.
Ray
,
L. R.
, and
Tian
,
L.
, 1999, “
Damage Detection in Smart Structures Through Sensitivity Enhancing Feedback Control
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
227
(
5
), pp.
987
1002
.
5.
Solbeck
,
J. A.
, and
Ray
,
L. R.
, 2006, “
Damage Identification Using Sensitivity-Enhancing Control and Identified Models
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
128
(
2
), pp.
210
220
.
6.
Senba
,
A.
, and
Furuya
,
H.
, 2004, “
System Identification of Adaptive Gyroscopic Damper System Using Sensitivity Analysis
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci.
0549-3811,
47
(
155
), pp.
30
37
.
7.
Wada
,
B. K.
, 1990, “
Adaptive Structures: An Overview
,”
J. Spacecr. Rockets
0022-4650,
27
(
3
), pp.
330
337
.
8.
Furuya
,
H.
, and
Kobori
,
A.
, 1999, “
Suppression of Multiple Modes Vibration of Flexible Structures With Adaptive Gyroscopic Damper System
,”
Tenth International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies
,
Technomic
,
Paris
, pp.
127
134
.
9.
Carlson
,
J. D.
,
Catanzarite
,
D. M.
, and
Clair
,
St. K. A.
, 1996, “
Commercial Magneto-Rheological Fluid Devices
,”
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B
0217-9792,
10
(
23–24
), pp.
2857
2865
.
10.
Onoda
,
J.
,
Endo
,
T.
,
Tamaoki
,
H.
, and
Watanabe
,
N.
, 1985, “
Vibration Suppression by Variable-Stiffness Members
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
29
(
6
), pp.
977
983
.
11.
Miura
,
K.
,
Furuya
,
H.
, and
Suzuki
,
K.
, 1985, “
Variable Geometry Truss and Its Application to Deployable Truss and Space Crane Arm
,”
Acta Astron.
0001-5237,
12
(
7∕8
), pp.
599
607
.
12.
Senba
,
A.
, and
Furuya
,
H.
, 2004, “
Variable Matrices Method for Self-Identification of Adaptive Gyroscopic Structure Systems
,”
45th AIAA∕ASME∕ASCE∕AHS∕ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conference
, AIAA Paper No. 2004-1980.
13.
Meirovitch
,
L.
, 2001,
Fundamentals of Vibrations
,
McGraw-Hill
,
Boston
, Chap. 9, pp.
606
608
.
You do not currently have access to this content.