This paper is concerned with the analysis of active and passive hybrid actions in structures with active constrained damping layers (ACL). A system model is derived via Hamilton’s Principle, based on the constitutive equations of the elastic, viscoelastic, and piezoelectric materials. The model converges to a purely active piezotronic system as the thickness of the viscoelastic material (VEM) layer approaches zero. A mixed Galerkin-GHM (Golla-Hughes-McTavish) method is employed to discretize and analyze the model in time domain. With an LQR (linear quadratic regulator) optimal control, the effects of the active constrained layer configuration on the system vibration suppression performance and control effort requirements are investigated. Analysis illustrates that the active piezoelectric action with proper feedback control will always enhance the damping ability of the passive constrained layer. When compared to a purely active configuration, while the viscoelastic layer of the ACL treatment will enhance damping, it will also reduce the direct control authorities (active action transmissibility) from the active source to the host structure. Therefore, whether the ACL treatment is better than a purely active configuration depends on whether the effect of damping enhancement is greater than that of transmissibility reduction caused by the VEM layer. The significance of these effects depends very much on the viscoelastic layer thickness and material properties. With some parameter combinations, the ACL configuration could require more control effort while achieving less vibration reductions compared to a purely active system. Through analyzing the performance and control effort indices, the conditions where this active-passive hybrid approach can outperform both the passive and active configurations are quantified. Based on this study, design guidelines can be set up to effectively integrate the host structure with the piezoelectric and viscoelastic materials, such that a truly beneficial active-passive hybrid control system could be achieved.

1.
Agnes, G. S., and Napolitano, K., 1993, “Active Constrained Layer Viscoelastic Damping,” Proceedings 34th SDM Conference, pp. 3499–3506.
2.
Azvine
B.
,
Tomlinson
G. R.
, and
Wynne
R. J.
,
1995
, “
Use of Active Constrained Layer Damping for Controlling Resonant Vibration
,”
Journal of Smart Materials and Structures
, Vol.
4
, No.
1
, pp.
1
6
.
3.
Bailey, T., Gruzen, A., and Madden, P., 1988, “RCS/Piezoelectric Distributed Actuator Study,” AFAL-TR-88-038.
4.
Baz, A., 1993, “Active Constrained Layer Damping,” Proceedings of Damping ’93, San Francisco, CA., pp. IBB 1–23.
5.
Baz
A.
, and
Ro
J.
,
1993
a, “
Partial Treatment of Flexible Beams with Active Constrained Layer Damping
,”
Recent Developments in Stability, Vibration, and Control of Structural Systems
, ASME AMD-Vol.
167
, pp.
61
80
.
6.
Baz, A., and Ro, J., 1993b, “Vibration Control of Rotating Beams with Active Constrained Layer Damping,” First ARO Workshop on Smart Structures, September 22–24, Arhngton, TX.
7.
Baz, A., and Ro, J., 1994, “The Concept and Performance of Active Constrained Layer Damping Treatments,” Sound and Vibration, March issue, pp. 18–21.
8.
Christensen, R. M., 1982, Theory of Viscoelasticity: An Introduction, 2nd Ed., Academic Press, Inc., New York.
9.
Franklin, G. F., Power, J., and Emami-Naeini, A., 1986, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, Addison-Wesley.
10.
Golla
D. F.
, and
Hughes
P. C.
,
1985
, “
Dynamics of Viscoelastic Structures—A Time Domain, Finite Element Formulation
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
52
, pp.
897
906
.
11.
IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity, 1987, ANSI-IEEE Std 176-1987.
12.
Inman, D. J., 1989, Vibration with Control, Measurement, and Stability, Prentice Hall.
13.
Lam
M. J.
,
Saunders
W. R.
, and
Inman
D. J.
,
1995
, “
Modeling Active Constrained Layer Damping Using Golla-Hughes-McTavish Approach
,”
SPIE Smart Structures and Materials
, Vol.
2445
, pp.
86
97
.
14.
Lewis, F. L., 1992, Applied Optimal Control and Estimation, Prentice Hall.
15.
McTavish
D. J.
, and
Hughes
P. C.
,
1993
, “
Modeling of Linear Viscoelastic Space Structures
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS
, Vol.
115
, pp.
103
110
.
16.
Mead
D. J.
, and
Markus
S.
,
1969
, “
The Forced Vibration of a Three-layer, Damped Sandwich Beam with Arbitrary Boundary Conditions
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
10
, No.
2
, pp.
163
175
.
17.
Shen
I. Y.
,
1994
a, “
Hybrid Damping Through Intelligent Constrained Layer Treatments
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS
, Vol.
116
, pp.
341
349
.
18.
Shen
I. Y.
,
1994
b, “
Bending Vibration Control of Composite and Isotropic Plates Through Intelligent Constrained Layer Treatments
,”
Journal of Smart Materials and Structures
, Vol.
3
, pp.
59
70
.
19.
Shen
I. Y.
,
1994
c, “
Stability and Controllability of Euler-Bernoulli Beams with Intelligent Constrained Layer Treatments
,”
Active Control of Vibration and Noise
, ASME DE-Vol.
75
, pp.
169
178
.
20.
Tzou, H. S., and Anderson, G. L., 1992, Intelligent Structural Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston.
21.
Van Nostrand, W. C., 1994, “Active Constrained Layer Damping Using PZT Actuators,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stale University of New York at Buffalo.
22.
Van Nostrand
W. C.
,
Knowles
G. J.
, and
Inman
D. J.
,
1993
, “
Active Constrained Layer Damping for Micro-satellites
,”
Dynamics and Control of Structures in Space
, Vol.
II
, pp.
667
681
.
23.
Van Nostrand, W. C., Knowles, G. J., and Inman, D. J., 1994, “Finite Element Model for Active Constrained-Layer Damping,” Proceedings of Conference on Smart. Structures and Materials, Orlando, FL, Feb. 14–16, 1994, SPIE Vol. 2193, pp. 126–137.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.