Aft-loaded vane designs can have an impact on surface heat transfer distributions by accelerating boundary layers for a greater portion of the suction surface. New combustion systems developed for low emissions have produced substantial changes to the characteristics of inlet turbulence entering nozzle guide vanes. This paper documents heat transfer rates on an aft-loaded vane subject to turbulence generated by mock combustion configurations representative of recently developed catalytic and dry low NOx (DLN) combustors. Four different inlet turbulence conditions with levels ranging up to 21% are documented in this study and vane heat transfer rates are acquired at vane exit chord Reynolds numbers ranging from 500,000 to 2,000,000. Heat transfer distributions show the influence of the turbulence conditions on heat transfer augmentation and transition. Cascade aerodynamics are well documented and match pressure distributions predicted by a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code for this large-scale low-speed facility. The aft-loaded vane pressure distribution exhibits a minimum value at about 50% arc on the suction surface. This comprehensive vane heat transfer data set is expected to represent an excellent test case for vane heat transfer predictive methods. Predictive comparisons are shown based on a two-dimensional boundary layer code using an algebraic turbulence model for augmentation as well as a transition model.

1.
Ames
,
F. E.
,
Wang
,
C.
, and
Barbot
,
P. A.
,
2002
, “
Measurement and Prediction of the Influence of Catalytic and Dry Low NOx Combustor Turbulence on Vane Surface Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Turbomach
,
125
, pp.
221
231
.
2.
Ames
,
F. E.
,
Barbot
,
P. A.
,
Wang
,
C.
,
2002
, “
Effects of Aeroderivative Combustor Turbulence on Endwall Heat Transfer Distributions Acquired in a Linear Vane Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
125
, pp.
210
220
.
3.
Ames, F. E., Barbot, P. A., and Wang, C., “Effects of Catalytic and Dry Low NOx Combustor Turbulence on Endwall Heat Transfer Distributions,” Abstract No. GT-2003-38507.
4.
Zimmerman, D. R., 1979, “Laser Anemometer Measurements at the Exit of a T63-C20 Combustor,” NASA CR-159623.
5.
Van Fossen, G. J., and Bunker, R. S., “Augmentation of Stagnation Heat Transfer due to Turbulence From a DLN Can Combustor,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-215.
6.
Ames
,
F. E.
,
1997
, “
The Influence of Large-Scale High-Intensity Turbulence on Vane Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
23
30
.
7.
Moss, R. W., and Oldfield, M. L. G., 1991, “Measurements of Hot Combustor Turbulence Spectra,” ASME Paper No. 91-GT-351.
8.
Ames, F. E., and Moffat, R. J., 1990, “Heat Transfer With High Intensity, Large Scale Turbulence: The Flat Plate Turbulent Boundary Layer and the Cylindrical Stagnation Point,” Report No. HMT-44, Thermosciences Division of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
9.
Hunt
,
J. C. R.
,
1973
, “
A Theory of Turbulent Flow Round Two-Dimensional Bluff Bodies
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
61, Part 4
, p.
625
625
.
10.
Britter
,
R. E.
,
Hunt
,
J. C. R.
, and
Mumford
,
J. C.
, 1979, “The Distortion of Turbulence by a Circular Cylinder,” J. Fluid Mech., 92.
11.
Van Fossen
,
G. J.
,
Simoneau
,
R. J.
, and
Ching
,
C. Y.
,
1995
, “
The Influence of Turbulence Parameters, Reynolds Number, and Body Shape on Stagnation Region Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
117
, pp.
597
603
.
12.
Arts, T., Lambert de Rouvroit, M., and Rutherford, A. W., 1990, “Aero-thermal Investigation of a Highly Loaded Transonic Linear Turbine Guide Vane Cascade,” Technical Note 174, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Belgium.
13.
Mayle
,
R. E.
,
1991
, “
The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
509
537
.
14.
Zhang
,
L.
, and
Han
,
J.-C.
,
1994
, “
Influence of Mainstream Turbulence on Heat Transfer Coefficients From a Gas Turbine Blade
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
116
, pp.
896
903
.
15.
Thole
,
K. A.
, and
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
1995
, “
Enhanced Heat Transfer and Skin Friction due to High Freestream Turbulence
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
117
, p.
418
418
.
16.
FLUENT 5.3, 1999, FLUENT 5.3 User’s Guide, Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH.
17.
Smith, D., 2000, private communication, Rolls-Royce, Indianapolis, IN.
18.
Kays, W. M., 1987, “STAN7, a Finite Difference Boundary Layer Code.”
19.
Moffat
,
R. J.
,
1988
, “
Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
1
, pp.
3
17
.
20.
Ames, F. E., Kwon, K., and Moffat, R. J., 1999, “An Algebraic Model for High Intensity Large Scale Turbulence,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-160.
You do not currently have access to this content.