Aircraft fan and compressor blade leading edges suffer from atmospheric particulate erosion that reduces aerodynamic performance. Recontouring the blade leading edge region can restore blade performance. This process typically results in blades of varying chord length. The question therefore arises as to whether performance of refurbished fans and compressors could be further improved if blades of varying chord length are installed into the disk in a certain order. To investigate this issue the aerodynamic performance of a transonic compressor rotor operating with blades of varying chord length was measured in back-to-back compressor test rig entries. One half of the rotor blades were the full nominal chord length while the remaining half of the blades were cut back at the leading edge to 95% of chord length and recontoured. The rotor aerodynamic performance was measured at 100, 80, and 60% of design speed for three blade installation configurations: nominal-chord blades in half of the disk and short-chord blades in half of the disk; four alternating quadrants of nominal-chord and short-chord blades; nominal-chord and short-chord blades alternating around the disk. No significant difference in performance was found between configurations, indicating that blade chord variation is not important to aerodynamic performance above the stall chord limit if leading edges have the same shape. The stall chord limit for most civil aviation turbofan engines is between 94–96% of nominal (new) blade chord.

1.
Sallee, G. P., Kruckenburg, H. D., and Toomey, E. H., 1978, “Analysis of Turbofan Engine Performance Deterioration and Proposed Follow-on Tests,” NASA CR-134769.
2.
Kramer, W. H., Paas, J. E., Smith, J. J., and Wulf, R. H., 1980, “CF6-6D Engine Short-term Performance Deterioration,” NASA CR-159830.
3.
Covey, R. R., Mascetti, G. J., and Roessler, W. U., 1978, “Examination of Commercial Aviation Operational Energy Conservation Strategies,” The Aerospace Corporation, Aerospace Report No. ATR-79 (7761)-1, Vol. 2.
4.
Proc., DOE/FAA Symposium on Commercial Aviation Energy Conservation Strategies, Apr., 1981.
5.
Suder
,
K. L.
,
Chima
,
R. V.
,
Strazisar
,
A. J.
, and
Roberts
,
W. B.
,
1994
, “
The Effect of Adding Roughness and Thickness to a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
117
, pp.
491
505
.
6.
Roberts
,
W. B.
,
1995
, “
Advanced Turbofan Blade Refurbishment Technique
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
, Tech. Brief,
117
, pp.
666
667
.
7.
Reid
,
L.
, and
Urasek
,
D. C.
,
1973
, “
Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of a Blunt Leading Edge on the Performance of a Transonic Rotor
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
95
, pp.
199
204
.
8.
Roberts, W. B., 1984, “Axial Compressor Performance Restoration by Blade Profile Control,” ASME Paper No. 84-GT-232.
9.
Roberts, W. B., 1995, “A Study of the Performance and Stalling Behavior of JT8D Short Chord Compressor Blade Elements,” Airfoil Management-Airfoil Technologies International Internal Note (Oct.).
10.
Roberts, W. B., 1996, “A Study of the Performance and Stalling Behavior of CF6-80C2 Short Chord Compressor Blade Elements,” Airfoil Technologies International Internal Note (May).
11.
Reid, L., and Moore, R. D., 1978, “Design and Overall Performance of Four Highly-Loaded, High-Speed Inlet Stages for an Advanced High-Pressure-Ratio Core Compressor,” NASA Tech. Memo., 1337.
12.
Reid, L., and Moore, R. D., 1978, “Performance of a Single-Stage Axial-Flow Transonic Compressor with Rotor and Stator Aspect Ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, Respectively, and with Design Pressure Ratio of 1.82,” NASA Tech. Memo., 1338.
13.
Model, D., and Roberts, W. B., 1997, “A New Lease of Life for Gas Turbine Airfoils,” Aircraft Technology Engineering and Maintenance Engine Yearbook, 1996–1997.
You do not currently have access to this content.