An experimental and analytical study has been performed on the effect of Reynolds number and free-stream turbulence on boundary layer transition location on the suction surface of a controlled diffusion airfoil (CDA). The experiments were conducted in a rectilinear cascade facility at Reynolds numbers between 0.7 and 3.0×106 and turbulence intensities from about 0.7 to 4 percent. An oil streak technique and liquid crystal coatings were used to visualize the boundary layer state. For small turbulence levels and all Reynolds numbers tested, the accelerated front portion of the blade is laminar and transition occurs within a laminar separation bubble shortly after the maximum velocity near 35–40 percent of chord. For high turbulence levels (Tu>3 percent) and high Reynolds numbers, the transition region moves upstream into the accelerated front portion of the CDA blade. For those conditions, the sensitivity to surface roughness increases considerably; at Tu=4 percent, bypass transition is observed near 7–10 percent of chord. Experimental results are compared to theoretical predictions using the transition model, which is implemented in the MISES code of Youngren and Drela. Overall, the results indicate that early bypass transition at high turbulence levels must alter the profile velocity distribution for compressor blades that are designed and optimized for high Reynolds numbers.

1.
Dong
,
Y.
, and
Cumptsy
,
N.
,
1990
, “
Compressor Blade Boundary Layers: Part 2—Measurements With Incident Wakes
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
112
, pp.
231
240
.
2.
Teusch, R., Fottner, L., and Swoboda, M., 1999, “Experimental Investigation of Wake-Induced Transition in a Linear Compressor Cascade With Controlled Diffusion Blading,” 14th ISABE Conference, Florence, Sept., Paper No. 99-7057.
3.
Solomon, W. J., and Walker, G. J., 1995, “Observation of Wake-Induced Transition on an Axial Compressor Blade,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-381.
1.
Halstead
,
D. E.
,
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
Okiishi
,
T. H.
,
Walker
,
G. J.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Shin
,
H. W.
,
1997
, “
Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines: Part 1–4
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
114
127
;
2.
1997
119
, pp.
426
444
;
3.
1997
119
, pp.
225
237
;
4.
1997
119
, pp.
128
139
.
1.
Pieper, S., Schulte, J., Hoynacki, A., and Gallus, H.E., 1996, “Experimental Investigation of a Single Stage Axial Flow Compressor With Controlled Diffusion Airfoils,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT- 81.
2.
Cumpsty, N. A., Dong, Y., and Li, Y. S., 1995, “Compressor Blade Boundary Layers in the Presence of Wakes,” ASME Paper No. 95- GT-443.
3.
Hourmouziadis, J., 1989, “Aerodynamic Design of Low Pressure Turbines,” AGARD Lecture Series No. 167.
4.
Ko¨ller
,
U.
,
Mo¨nig
,
R.
,
Ku¨sters
,
B.
, and
Schreiber
,
H. A.
,
2000
, “
Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines, Part I: Design and Optimization
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
, pp.
397
405
.
5.
Ku¨sters
,
B.
,
Schreiber
,
H. A.
,
Ko¨ller
,
U.
, and
Mo¨nig
,
R.
,
1999
, “
Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy Duty Gas Turbines, Part II: Experimental and Analytical Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
, pp.
406
414
.
6.
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
1985
, “
Loss Reduction in Axial-Flow Compressors Through Low Speed Model Testing
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
, pp.
354
363
.
7.
Abu-Ghannam
,
B. J.
, and
Shaw
,
R.
,
1980
, “
Natural Transition of Boundary Layers—The Effect of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient and Flow History
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
22
, No.
5
, pp.
213
228
.
8.
Gostelow
,
J. P.
, and
Bluden
,
A. R.
,
1989
, “
Investigation of Boundary Layer Transition in an Adverse Pressure Gradient
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
111
, pp.
366
375
.
9.
Mayle
,
R. E.
,
1991
, “
The 1991 GTI Scholar Lecture: The Role of Laminar–Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
509
537
.
10.
Blair
,
M. F.
,
1982
, “
Influence of Free-Stream Turbulence on Boundary Layer Transition in Favorable Pressure Gradients
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
104
, pp.
743
750
.
11.
Drela, M., and Youngren, H., 1991, “Viscous/Inviscid Method for Preliminary Design of Transonic Cascades,” AIAA Paper No. 91-2364.
12.
Drela, M., 1995, “Implementation of Modified Abu-Ghannam Shaw Transition Criterion,” MISES User’s Guide, MIT, Computational Aerospace Science Lab., Cambridge, MA.
13.
Schreiber, H. A., Starken, H., and Steinert, W., 1993, “Transonic and Supersonic Cascades,” AGARDOgraph “Advanced Methods for Cascade Testing,” AGARD AG 328, pp. 35–59.
14.
Steinert
,
W.
, and
Starken
,
H.
,
1996
, “
Off-Design Transition and Separation Behavior of a CDA Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
204
210
.
15.
Bize, D., Lempereur, C., Mathe, J. M., Mignosi, A., Seraudie, A., and Serrot, G., 1998, “Transition Analysis by Surface Temperature Mapping Using Liquid Crystals,” Aerospace Sci. Tech., Paris, No. 7, pp. 439–449.
16.
Mick, W. J., 1987, “Transition and Heat Transfer in Highly Accelerated Rough-Wall Boundary Layers,” Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
17.
Scha¨ffler
,
A.
,
1980
, “
Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Effect of Reynolds Number and Blade Surface Roughness on Multistage Axial Flow Compressors
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
102
, pp.
5
12
.
You do not currently have access to this content.