Experimental and theoretical data are presented for two interchangeable swirl brakes designed in connection with the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) Alternate Turbopump Development (ATD) High-Pressure Fuel Turbopump (HPFTP) program. The experimental data includes rotordynamic data for a extensive variation of test variables. Comparison of the swirl brake performance revealed that a nonaerodynamic swirl brake design proved as efficient and at times better than an aerodynamic design. For this reason a theoretical investigation using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was recently carried out. This modeling focused on predicting the seal inlet swirl ratio which is the primary swirl brake performance parameter. The nonaerodynamic swirl brake showed superior performance for a variety of test variable conditions. Strong separation vortices within the swirl vanes are the main reason for this finding.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
gas turbines, brakes, space vehicles, aerodynamics, pumps, rotational flow, swirling flow
Topics:
Brakes, Flow (Dynamics), Rotors, Design
1.
Benchert, H., and Wachter, J., 1980, “Flow Induced Spring Coefficients of Labyrinth Seals for Application in Rotordynamics,” NASA CP2133, Proceedings of the workshop: Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High Performance Turbomachinery, held at Texas A&M University, 12–14 May 1980, pp. 189–212.
2.
Nielsen, K. K., 1997, “Rotordynamic Impact of Swirl Brakes,” Diploma Course Report 1997-28, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-St-Gene`se, Belgium.
3.
Nielsen, K. K., Van den Braembussche, R. A., and Myllerup, C. M., 1998, “Optimization of Swirl Brakes by Means of a 3D Navier-Stokes Solver,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-328.
4.
Nielsen, K. K., Myllerup, C. M., and Van den Braembussche, R. A., 1999, “Parametric Study of the Flow in Swirl Brakes by Means of a 3D Navier-Stokes Solver,” C557/088/99/, Transactions of the Third European Conference on Turbomachinery, pp. 489–498.
5.
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Ramsey
,
C.
,
1990
, “
Seal-Rotordynamic-Coefficient Test Results for a Model SSME ATD-HPFTP Turbine Interstage Seal With and Without a Swirl Brake
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
113
, pp.
198
–
203
.
6.
Childs
,
D. W.
,
Nelson
,
C. E.
,
Nicks
,
C.
,
Scharrer
,
J.
,
Elrod
,
D.
, and
Hale
,
K.
,
1986
, “
Theory Versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Annular Gas Seals: Part 1—Test Facility and Apparatus
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
108
, pp.
426
–
432
.
7.
Childs
,
D. W.
,
Baskharone
,
E.
, and
Ramsey
,
C.
,
1991
, “
Test Results for Rotordynamic Coefficients of the SSME HPOTP Turbine Interstage Seal With Two Swirl Brakes
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
113
, pp.
577
–
583
.
8.
Griffin, M., Kleynhans, G., Alexander, C., Gansle, A., Pierce, T., and Childs, D. W., 1992, “Experimental Rotordynamic Coefficient and Static Characteristic Results for a Model SSME ATD-HPFTP Turbine Interstage Seal With and Without a Non-Aerodynamic Swirl Brake,” TL-SEAL-20-92 #366.
9.
Holman, J. P., 1978, Experimental Methods for Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 45.
10.
AEA Technology, 1999, CFX-TASCflow User Documentation, Version 2.9.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.