Abstract

In this paper, we (i) present a methodology for determining the aerodynamic performance of bi-directional turbomachines for pumped thermal energy storage, i.e., turbomachines designed to operate as a compressor in one direction, and then as a turbine in the opposite direction, (ii) carry out performance computations for such turbomachines, and (iii) propose principles for conceptual design of these devices. Focus is placed on using the energy storage cycle not only to identify the novel requirements placed on bi-directional turbomachines but also to estimate the effect of these requirements on the efficiency of the energy storage process. In particular, the difference between aerodynamic loading in forward and in backward operation causes the blading to work at incidences leading to the performance below maximum efficiency, resulting in a lower round-trip efficiency. The description of the design principles includes determination of the number of stages, definition of nondimensional parameters for blading selection, and optimization of two-dimensional blading for bi-directional operation. The assessment of stage count shows the relationship between relative Mach number, pressure ratio, and round-trip efficiency. The nondimensional parameters are assessed through a bi-directional analogue to existing “Smith charts,” for the efficiency of single-direction turbomachines, as a function of camber and stagger. The blade shape evaluation and optimization show how the blade profile can be modified to address the requirements of a bi-directional turbomachine, enabling an increase in round-trip efficiency of two percentage points compared to a baseline double circular arc configuration.

References

1.
Denholm
,
P.
,
Ela
,
E.
,
Kirby
,
B.
, and
Milligan
,
M.
,
2010
, “
The Role of Energy Storage With Renewable Electricity Generation
,” Technical Report No. NREL/TP-6A2-47187,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
2.
Laughlin
,
R.
,
2017
, “
Pumped Thermal Energy Storage With Heat Exchange
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
,
9
(
4
), p.
044103
.
3.
Kesseli
,
J.
,
2019
, “
Reversible Counter-Rotating Turbomachine to Enable Brayton-Laughlin Cycle
,” Technical Report No. 1906-1535,
Department of Energy ARPA-e
,
Washington, DC
.
4.
Harris
,
P.
,
Wolf
,
T.
,
Kesseli
,
J.
, and
Laughlin
,
R.
, “
An Investigation of Reversing Axial Turbomachinery for Thermal Energy Storage Application
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2020: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Virtual, Online
, Paper No. GT2020-15286.
5.
Waldren
,
J. J.
,
Clark
,
C. J.
,
Grimshaw
,
S. D.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
,
2021
, “
Non-Dimensional Parameters for Comparing Conventional and Counter-Rotating Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
143
(
12
), p.
121006
.
6.
Dickens
,
T.
, and
Day
,
I.
,
2011
, “
The Design of Highly Loaded Axial Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
3
), p.
031007
.
7.
Drela
,
M.
, and
Youngren
,
H.
,
2008
,
A User’s Guide to MISES 2.63
,
MIT Aerospace Computational Design Laboratory
,
Cambridge, MA
.
8.
Dixon
,
S. L.
, and
Hall
,
C. A.
,
2010
,
Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
, 6th ed.,
Elsevier
,
New York
.
9.
Drela
,
M.
,
1996
,
A User’s Guide to LINDOP V2.50
,
MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
,
Cambridge, MA
.
10.
Drela
,
M.
,
2014
,
Flight Vehicle Aerodynamics
,
The MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
.
You do not currently have access to this content.