Abstract

The coupling of aerodynamics and structural mechanics is an important step in the design process of aeronautical devices with morphing parts. In this article, a 2D–3D coupling approach is developed to study a morphing blade cascade. Two shape memory alloy actuators are placed on the upper and lower sides of the blade to make possible the change in shape of the leading edge. In the present study, a preliminary design study is conducted by considering a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of an airfoil cascade coupled with a three-dimensional structural analysis of the whole 3D blade. A methodology is developed to match 2D and 3D meshes such that the aerodynamic loads can be easily transferred to the structural analysis. From there, the deformed blade geometry due to both aerodynamic loads and actuator work can be transferred back to the CFD solver, and the iterative aero-structural coupling loop can be repeated until convergence. The aero-structural coupling strategy developed in this study is also applied to a blade cascade study aiming to improve its performance by morphing the leading-edge of the blade. The results of this application show that by morphing the leading-edge blade of only few millimeters (less than 2 mm), it is possible to achieve a relevant performance improvement in terms of total pressure loss coefficient decrease of about 53% considering off-design conditions.

References

1.
Vincent
,
J.
,
2000
, “
Smart by Name, Smart by Nature
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
9
(
3
), p.
255
.
2.
Mueller
,
T.
, and
Lawerenz
,
M.
,
2003
, “
Shape Adaptive Airfoils for Turbomachinery Applications Undergoing Large Deformations
,”
44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference
,
Norfolk, VA
,
Apr. 7–10
, p.
1561
.
3.
Garcia
,
E.
,
2002
, “Smart Structures and Actuators: Past, Present, and Future,”
Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies
, Vol.
4698
,
International Society for Optics and Photonics
, pp.
1
12
.
4.
Chopra
,
I.
,
2002
, “
Review of State of Art of Smart Structures and Integrated Systems
,”
AIAA. J.
,
40
(
11
), pp.
2145
2187
.
5.
Thirupathi
,
S. R.
,
Seshu
,
P.
, and
Naganathan
,
N. G.
,
1997
, “
A Finite-Element Static Analysis of Smart Turbine Blades
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
6
(
5
), p.
607
.
6.
Cross
,
C. J.
, and
Fleeter
,
S.
,
2002
, “
Shunted Piezoelectrics for Passive Control of Turbomachine Blading Flow-Induced Vibrations
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
11
(
2
), p.
239
.
7.
Pern
,
N.
, and
Jacob
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Aerodynamic Flow Control Using Shape Adaptive Surfaces
,”
Proceeding of Citeseer
, pp.
12
15
.
8.
Riemenschneider
,
J.
,
Huxdorf
,
O.
, and
Opitz
,
S.
,
2014
, “Effects of Piezoceramic Actuator in Quasistatic Use,”
Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems
, Vol.
46148
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, p.
V001T01A013
.
9.
Monner
,
H. P.
,
Huxdorf
,
O.
,
Riemenschneider
,
J.
, and
Keimer
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Design and Manufacturing of Morphing Fan Blades for Experimental Investigations in a Cascaded Wind Tunnel
,”
23rd AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference
, p.
0790
.
10.
Loewy
,
R. G.
,
1997
, “
Recent Developments in Smart Structures With Aeronautical Applications
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
6
(
5
), p.
R11
.
11.
Bil
,
C.
,
Massey
,
K.
, and
Abdullah
,
E. J.
,
2013
, “
Wing Morphing Control with Shape Memory Alloy Actuators
,”
J. Intel. Mater. Syst. Struct.
,
24
(
7
), pp.
879
898
.
12.
Barbarino
,
S.
,
Flores
,
E. S.
,
Ajaj
,
R. M.
,
Dayyani
,
I.
, and
Friswell
,
M. I.
,
2014
, “
A Review on Shape Memory Alloys With Applications to Morphing Aircraft
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
23
(
6
), p.
063001
.
13.
Ko
,
S.-H.
,
Bae
,
J.-S.
, and
Rho
,
J.-H.
,
2014
, “
Development of a Morphing Flap Using Shape Memory Alloy Actuators: The Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Morphing Flap
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
23
(
7
), p.
074015
.
14.
Ricci
,
S.
, and
Terraneo
,
M.
,
2006
, “
Application of Mdo Techniques to the Preliminary Design of Morphed Aircraft
,”
11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference
, p.
7018
.
15.
Potsdam
,
M.
,
Yeo
,
H.
, and
Johnson
,
W.
,
2006
, “
Rotor Airloads Prediction Using Loose Aerodynamic/Structural Coupling
,”
J. Aircraft
,
43
(
3
), pp.
732
742
.
16.
Kroll
,
N.
,
Heinrich
,
R.
,
Krueger
,
W.
, and
Nagel
,
B.
,
2008
, “
Fluid-Structure Coupling for Aerodynamic Analysis and Design: A Dlr Perspective
,”
46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
, p.
561
.
17.
Gamboa
,
P.
,
Vale
,
J.
,
Lau
,
F.
, and
Suleman
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Optimization of a Morphing Wing Based on Coupled Aerodynamic and Structural Constraints
,”
AIAA. J.
,
47
(
9
), pp.
2087
2104
.
18.
Molinari
,
G.
,
Quack
,
M.
,
Dmitriev
,
V.
,
Morari
,
M.
,
Jenny
,
P.
, and
Ermanni
,
P.
,
2011
, “
Aero-structural Optimization of Morphing Airfoils for Adaptive Wings
,”
J. Intel. Mater. Syst. Struct.
,
22
(
10
), pp.
1075
1089
.
19.
Molinari
,
G.
,
Arrieta
,
A. F.
, and
Ermanni
,
P.
,
2014
, “
Aero-structural Optimization of Three-Dimensional Adaptive Wings With Embedded Smart Actuators
,”
AIAA. J.
,
52
(
9
), pp.
1940
1951
.
20.
Reutter
,
O.
,
Hemmert-Pottmann
,
S.
,
Hergt
,
A.
, and
Nicke
,
E.
,
2014
, “Endwall Contouring and Fillet Design for Reducing Losses and Homogenizing the Outflow of a Compressor Cascade,”
Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
, Vol.
45608
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, p.
V02AT37A007
.
21.
Reutter
,
O.
,
Rozanski
,
M.
,
Hergt
,
A.
, and
Nicke
,
E.
,
2017
, “
Advanced Endwall Contouring for Loss Reduction and Outflow Homogenization for an Optimized Compressor Cascade
,”
Int. J. Turbomach. Propuls. Power
,
2
(
1
), p.
1
.
You do not currently have access to this content.