Abstract

Non-synchronous pressure and temperature fluctuations at the hub cavity of a turbine stage are the main focus of this study. Cavity modes are unsteady fluctuations generated at the cavity exit due to instabilities in this region. The cavity modes carried into the main flow impose an unsteady flow field in the rotor passages, which varies the passage-wise flow parameters considerably. A two-stage axial turbine was designed and tested in the “LISA” test facility at ETH Zurich. A reference case with baseline geometry and a modified case with an axial deflector at the hub cavity exit were tested. Comprehensive unsteady pressure and temperature measurements were performed using fast response aerodynamic (FRAP) and entropy probes (FENT), respectively. In addition, 12 fast response unsteady pressure transducers were mounted on the stationary wall of the cavity exit to measure the main characteristic parameters of the cavity modes. Full annular unsteady simulations were also carried out for both cases to support the experiments. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) successfully predicted the effect of cavity modes on both frequency and amplitude of the fluctuations. The cavity modes indicated fluctuation amplitudes up to eight times of the blade passing fluctuations at the cavity exit. The analysis shows that the convected cavity modes alter the efficiency of different rotor passages by redistributing the mass flow and the losses resulting in a drop in overall efficiency. This work suggests that implementing a small axial deflector at the hub cavity exit would completely eliminate the cavity modes leading to a reduced pressure unsteadiness and enhanced efficiency.

References

1.
Schuepbach
,
P.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Rose
,
M. G.
, and
Gier
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Sensitivity of Turbine Efficiency and Flow Structures to Varying Purge Flow
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
26
(
1
), pp.
46
56
. 10.2514/1.44646
2.
Rebholz
,
P. S.
,
Krebietke
,
S.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
, and
Kalfas
,
A. I.
,
2016
, “
Turbine Aerodynamic Low-Frequency Oscillation and Noise Reduction Using Partial Shrouds
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
32
(
5)
, pp.
1067
1076
. 10.2514/1.B36031
3.
Chilla
,
M.
,
Hodson
,
H.
, and
Newman
,
D.
,
2013
, “
Unsteady Interaction Between Annulus and Turbine Rim Seal Flows
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
5
), p.
051024
. 10.1115/1.4023016
4.
Schädler
,
R.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Schmid
,
G.
, and
Voelker
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Modulation and Radial Migration of Turbine Hub Cavity Modes by the Rim Seal Purge Flow
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
1
), p.
011010
. 10.1115/1.4034416
5.
Julien
,
S.
,
Lefrancois
,
J.
,
Dumas
,
G.
,
Boutet-Blais
,
G.
,
Lapointe
,
S.
,
Caron
,
J. F.
, and
Marini
,
R.
,
2010
, “
Simulations of Flow Ingestion and Related Structures in a Turbine Disk Cavity
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010 : Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Glasgow, UK
,
June 14–18
, pp.
1071
1080
.
6.
Boudet
,
J.
,
Hills
,
N. J.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
2006
, “
Numerical Simulation of the Flow Interaction Between Turbine Main Annulus and Disc Cavities
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Barcelona, Spain
,
May 8–11
, pp.
553
562
.
7.
Jakoby
,
R.
,
Zierer
,
T.
,
Lindblad
,
K.
,
Larsson
,
J.
,
DeVito
,
L.
,
Bohn
,
D. E.
,
Joachim
,
F.
, and
Achim
,
D.
,
2004
, “
Numerical Simulation of the Unsteady Flow Field in an Axial Gas Turbine Rim Seal Configuration
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Vienna, Austria
,
June 14–17
, pp.
431
440
.
8.
Lautenschläger
,
A.
,
Braun
,
R.
,
Kusterer
,
K.
, and
Bohn
,
D.
,
2019
, “
Exploration of Unsteady and Steady Calculation Methods For Wheel Space Sealing Applications
,”
GPPS Zurich19 Proceedings
,
Zurich, Switzerland
,
Jan. 14–16
,
Paper No. TC-2019-053
.
9.
Sell
,
M.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Pfau
,
A.
,
Treiber
,
M.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
2001
, “
The 2-Stage Axial Turbine Test Facility ‘LISA,’
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo
,
New Orleans, LA
,
June 4–7
, p. V001T03A07.
10.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
2002
, “
Virtual Four Sensor Fast Response Aerodynamic Probe (FRAP)
,”
Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Measuring Techniques in Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines
,
Cambridge, UK
,
Sept. 23–24
, pp.
1
5
.
11.
Mansour
,
M.
,
2009
, “
A 48kHz Bandwidth, 1.8 mm Diameter Entropy Probe for Aerothermal Loss Measurements in Turbomachinery Flows
,”
PhD thesis
, Diss. ETH No. 18087, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Zurich.
12.
Basol
,
A. M.
,
2014
, “
Turbine Design Optimizations Using High Fidelity CFD
,”
PhD thesis
, Diss. ETH No. 21559, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Zurich.
13.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
1988
, “
Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models
,”
AIAA J.
,
26
(
11
), pp.
1299
1310
. 10.2514/3.10041
14.
Schadler
,
R.
,
2019
, “
Aerothermal Effects of High-Pressure Turbine Rim Seals and Blade Tip Geometries in the Presence of Cooling Flows
,”
PhD thesis
, Diss. ETH No. 26277, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Zurich.
15.
Cao
,
C.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Millington
,
P. R.
, and
Hogg
,
S. I.
,
2004
, “
Interaction of Rim Seal and Annulus Flows in an Axial Flow Turbine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
126
(
4
), pp.
786
793
. 10.1115/1.1772408
16.
Porreca
,
L.
,
Hollenstein
,
M.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
2007
, “
Turbulence Measurements and Analysis in a Multistage Axial Turbine
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
23
(
1
), pp.
227
234
. 10.2514/1.20022
You do not currently have access to this content.