Abstract

In this study, proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) has been applied to a large dataset describing the profile losses of low-pressure turbine (LPT) cascades, thus allowing (i) the identification of the most influencing parameters that affect the loss generation; (ii) the identification of the minimum number of requested conditions useful to educate a model with a reduced number of data. The dataset is constituted by the total pressure loss coefficient distributions in the pitchwise direction. The experiments have been conducted varying the flow Reynolds number, the reduced frequency, and the flow coefficient. Two cascades are considered: the first for tuning the procedure and identifying the number of really requested tests, and the second for the verification of the proposed model. They are characterized by the same axial chord but different pitch-to-chord ratio and different flow angles, hence two Zweifel numbers. The POD mode distributions indicate the spatial region where losses occur, the POD eigenvectors provide how such losses vary for different design conditions and the POD eigenvalues provide the rank of the approximation. Since the POD space shows an optimal basis describing the overall process with a low-rank representation (LRR), a smooth kernel is educated by means of least-squares method (LSM) on the POD eigenvectors. Particularly, only a subset of data (equal to the rank of the problem) has been used to generate the POD modes and related coefficients. Thanks to the LRR of the problem in the POD space, predictors are low-order polynomials of the independent variables (Re, f+, and ϕ). It will be shown that the smooth kernel adequately estimates the loss distribution in points that do not participate to the education. In addition, keeping the same steps for the education of the kernel on another cascade, loss distribution and magnitude are still well captured. Thus, the analysis show that the rank of the problem is much lower than the tested conditions, and consequently, a reduced number of tests are really necessary. This could be useful to reduce the number of hi-fidelity simulations or detailed experiments in the future, thus further contributing to optimize LPT blades.

References

1.
Craig
,
H.
, and
Cox
,
H.
,
1970
, “
Performance Estimation of Axial Flow Turbines
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
185
(
1
), pp.
407
424
.
2.
Kacker
,
S.
, and
Okapuu
,
U.
,
1982
, “
A Mean Line Prediction Method for Axial Flow Turbine Efficiency
,”
J. Eng. Power
,
104
(
1
), pp.
111
119
.
3.
Coull
,
J. D.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
2013
, “
Blade Loading and Its Application in the Mean-Line Design of Low Pressure Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
2
), p.
021032
.
4.
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Howell
,
R. J.
,
2005
, “
The Role of Transition in High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbines for Aeroengines
,”
Prog. Aeros. Sci.
,
41
(
6
), pp.
419
454
.
5.
Nagabhushana Rao
,
V.
,
Tucker
,
P.
,
Jefferson-Loveday
,
R.
, and
Coull
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Large Eddy Simulations in Low-Pressure Turbines: Effect of Wakes at Elevated Free-Stream Turbulence
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
43
, pp.
85
95
.
6.
Gompertz
,
K. A.
, and
Bons
,
J. P.
,
2011
, “
Combined Unsteady Wakes and Active Flow Control on a Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil
,”
AIAA J. Propulsion Power
,
27
(
5
), pp.
990
1000
.
7.
Coull
,
J. D.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
2011
, “
Unsteady Boundary-Layer Transition in Low-Pressure Turbines
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
681
, pp.
370
410
.
8.
Coull
,
J. D.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
2012
, “
Predicting the Profile Loss of High-Lift Low Pressure Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
2
), p.
021002
.
9.
Lumley
,
J. L.
,
1967
, “
The Structure of Inhomogeneous Turbulent Flows
,”
Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation
,
A. M.
Yaglom
and
V. I.
Tartarsky
, eds., Proceedings of the International Colloquium, Moscow, June 15–22, pp.
166
177
.
10.
Sirovich
,
L.
,
1987
, “
Turbulence and the Dynamics of Coherent Structures. Part I–III
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
,
45
, pp.
561
590
.
11.
Berkooz
,
G.
,
Holmes
,
P.
, and
Lumley
,
J. L.
,
1993
, “
The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech.
,
25
(
1
), pp.
539
575
.
12.
Lengani
,
D.
,
Simoni
,
D.
,
Ubaldi
,
M.
,
Zunino
,
P.
,
Bertini
,
F.
, and
Michelassi
,
V.
,
2017
, “
Accurate Estimation of Profile Losses and Analysis of Loss Generation Mechanisms in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
12
), p.
121007
.
13.
Lengani
,
D.
,
Simoni
,
D.
,
Pichler
,
R.
,
Sandberg
,
R.
,
Michelassi
,
V.
, and
Bertini
,
F.
,
2018
, “
Identification and Quantification of Losses in a Lpt Cascade by POD Applied to LES Data
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
70
, pp.
28
40
.
14.
Lengani
,
D.
,
Simoni
,
D.
,
Pichler
,
R.
,
Sandberg
,
R.
,
Michelassi
,
V.
, and
Bertini
,
F.
,
2019
, “
On the Identification and Decomposition of the Unsteady Losses in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
141
(
3
), p.
031005
.
15.
Simoni
,
D.
,
Yepmo
,
V.
,
Zunino
,
P.
,
Ubaldi
,
M.
,
Lengani
,
D.
,
Bertini
,
F.
, “
Turbine Cascade Profile Loss Sensitivity to Incoming Wake Parameters. Effects of Reduced Frequency, Wake Momentum Defect and Axial Gap
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
ASME Paper No. GT2019-91226
.
16.
Stieger
,
R. D.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
2004
, “
The Transition Mechanism of Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
(
4
), pp.
536
543
.
17.
Simoni
,
D.
,
Lengani
,
D.
,
Petronio
,
D.
, and
Bertini
,
F.
,
2020
. “
A Bayesian Approach for the Identification of Cascade Loss Model Strategy
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2020, Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
ASME Paper No. GT2020-14625
.
18.
Kutz
,
J. N.
,
Brunton
,
S. L.
,
Brunton
,
B. W.
, and
Proctor
,
J. L.
,
2016
,
Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Data-Driven Modeling of Complex Systems
,
SIAM
,
Philadelphia, PA
.
19.
Farge
,
M.
,
Hunt
,
J. C.
, and
Vassilicos
,
J. C.
,
1993
,
Wavelets, Fractals, and Fourier Transforms
,
Clarendon Press
,
New York
.
20.
Michelassi
,
V.
,
Chen
,
L.-W.
,
Pichler
,
R.
, and
Sandberg
,
R. D.
,
2015
, “
Compressible Direct Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Turbines—Part II: Effect of Inflow Disturbances
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
7
), p.
0710051
.
21.
Mahallati
,
A.
,
McAuliffe
,
B. R.
,
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, and
Praisner
,
T. J.
,
2013
, “
Aerodynamics of a Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers—Part I: Steady Flow Measurements
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
1
), p.
011010
.
22.
Williams
,
C. K.
, and
Rasmussen
,
C. E.
,
2006
,
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
, Vol.
2
,
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
.
23.
Raiola
,
M.
,
Discetti
,
S.
, and
Ianiro
,
A.
,
2015
, “
On PIV Random Error Minimization With Optimal POD-Based Low-Order Reconstruction
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
56
(
4
), p.
75
.
You do not currently have access to this content.