Two stators of a multistage centrifugal compressor with progressively smaller outer radii have been designed, built, and tested. The aim was to achieve a significant reduction in the outer diameter of the compressor stage without compromising performance. The reduction in size was achieved by reducing the diffusion ratio (outer radius/inner radius) of the vaneless diffuser in two steps. In the first step, the outer diameter of the entire stage was reduced by 8% compared with the baseline design. In the second stage, the outer diameter was reduced by 14%. The outer radius of the smallest design was limited by the impeller exit diameter, which was kept constant, as was the axial length of the stage. The large radius baseline design has been tested on a rotating rig in a 1.5 stage setup. This setup aimed at simulating the multistage behavior by applying a pseudostage upstream of the main stage. The pseudostage consisted of a set of nonrotating preswirl vanes in order to mimic an upstream impeller and was followed by a scaled version of the return channel of the main stage. The experimental database was then used to calibrate a 1D analysis code and 3D–computational fluid dynamics methods for the ensuing design and optimization part. By applying an extensive design-of-experiments, the endwalls as well as the vanes of the stator part were optimized for maximum efficiency and operation range. In order to preserve the multistage performance, the optimization was constrained by keeping the circumferentially averaged spanwise flow profiles at the exit of the smaller radius stages within close limits to the original design. The reduced radius designs were then tested in the same 1.5 stage setup as the baseline design. The results indicate that the reduction in size was feasible without compromising the efficiency and operation range of the stage.

1.
Ferrara
,
G.
,
Ferrari
,
L.
, and
Baldassarre
,
L.
, 2006, “
Experimental Characterization of Vaneless Diffuser Rotating Stall Part V: Influence of Diffuser Geometry on Stall Inception and Performance (3rd Impeller Tested)
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90693.
2.
Japikse
,
D.
, and
Baines
,
N. C.
, Diffuser Design Technology, Concepts ETI Inc., White River Junction, VT.
3.
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
, 1989,
Compressor Aerodynamics
,
Longman Scientific & Technical
,
Essex, UK
, Chap. 7.
4.
Rodgers
,
C.
, 1982, “
Static Pressure Recovery Characteristics of Some Radial Vaneless Diffusers
,”
Can. Aeronautics Space J.
0008-2821,
30
(
1
), pp.
42
54
.
5.
Johnston
,
J. P.
, and
Dean
,
R. C.
, 1966, “
Losses in Vaneless Diffusers of Centrifugal Compressors and Pumps
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
88
, pp.
49
62
.
6.
Jansen
,
W.
, 1964, “
Steady Fluid Flow in a Radial Vaneless Diffuser
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
86
, pp.
607
619
.
7.
Japikse
,
D.
, 1984,
Turbomachinery Diffuser Design Technology, The Design Technology Series DTS-1
,
Concepts ETI
,
Norwich, Vermont
.
8.
Senoo
,
Y.
,
Kinoshita
,
Y.
, and
Ishida
,
M.
, 1977, “
Asymmetric Flow in Vaneless Diffusers of Centrifugal Blowers
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
99
, pp.
104
114
.
9.
Inoue
,
M.
, and
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
, 1984, “
Experimental Study of Centrifugal Impeller Discharge Flow in Vaneless and Vaned Diffusers
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
106
, pp.
455
467
.
10.
Simon
,
H.
, and
Rothstein
,
E.
, 1983, “
On the Development of Return Passages of Multi-Stage Centrifugal Compressors
,” ASME Fluids Engineering Division, Vol.
3
, pp.
1
11
.
11.
Simpson
,
A.
,
Aalburg
,
C.
,
Schmitz
,
M.
,
Pannekeet
,
R.
,
Larisch
,
F.
, and
Michelassi
,
V.
, 2008, “
Design, Validation and Application of a Radial Cascade for Centrifugal Compressors
,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-51262.
You do not currently have access to this content.