Two-dimensional (2D) compressor flow simulation software has always been a very valuable tool in compressor preliminary design studies, as well as in compressor performance assessment operating under uniform and non-uniform inlet conditions. This type of software can also be used as a supplementary teaching tool. In this context, a new streamline curvature (SLC) software has been developed capable of analyzing the flow inside a compressor in two dimensions. The software was developed to provide great flexibility, in the sense that it can be used as: (a) a performance prediction tool for compressors of a known design, (b) a development tool to assess the changes in performance of a known compressor after implementing small geometrical changes, (c) a design tool to verify and refine the outcome of a preliminary compressor design analysis, and (d) a teaching tool to provide the student with an insight of the 2D flow field inside a compressor and how this could be effectively predicted using the SLC method combined with various algorithms and cascade models. Apart from describing in detail the design, structure, and execution of the SLC software, this paper also stresses the importance of developing robust, well thought-out software and highlights the main areas a potential programmer should focus on in order to achieve this. This text also highlights the programming features incorporated into the development of the software in order to make it amenable for teaching purposes. The paper reviews in detail the set of cascade models incorporated for subsonic and supersonic flow, for design and off-design operating conditions. Moreover, the methods used for the prediction of surge and choke are discussed in detail. The code has been validated against experimental results, which are presented in this paper together with the strong and weak points of this first version of the software and the potential for future development. Finally, an indicative case study is presented in which the shift of streamlines and radial velocity profiles is demonstrated under the influence of two sets of compressor inlet boundary conditions.

1.
Wu
,
C. H.
, and
Wolfenstein
,
L.
, 1949, “
Application of Radial Equilibrium Condition to Axial-Flow Compressor and Turbine Design
,” NACA TN-1795.
2.
Hamrick
,
J. K.
,
Ginsburg
,
A.
, and
Osborn
,
W. M.
, 1951, “
Method of Analysis for Compressible Flow Through Mixed Flow Centrifugal Impellers of Arbitrary Design
,” NACA Report 1082.
3.
Wright
,
C.
, and
Kovach
,
K.
, 1953, “
Design Procedure and Limited Test Results for a High Solidity, 12-inch Transonic Impeller With Axial Discharge
,” NACA RM E53B09.
4.
Giamati
,
G. C.
, and
Finger
,
B.
, 1965, “
Design Velocity Distribution in Meridional Plane in Aerodynamic Design of Axial-Flow Compressors
,” NASA SP-36, Chap. VIII.
5.
Swan
,
W. C.
, 1958, “
A Practical Method Of Predicting Transonic-Compressor Performance
,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 83, pp.
322
330
.
6.
Novak
,
R. A.
, 1967, “
Streamline Curvature Computing Procedures for Fluid-Flow Problems
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
89
, pp.
478
490
.
7.
Lieblein
,
S.
, 1965, “
Chapter VI-Experimental Flow In Two-Dimensional Cascades
,” in NASA SP 36-Aerodynamic Design Of Axial Flow Compressors, Scientific and Technical Information Division,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
, Washington DC.
8.
Carter
,
A. D. S.
, 1950, “
The Low Speed Performance of Related Aerofoils in Cascade
,” National Gas Turbine Establishment, Report No. R.55, September 1949, Re-printed by the Aeronautical Research Council, CP29.
9.
Lieblein
,
S.
, 1960, “
Incidence and Deviation Angle Correlations for Compressor Cascades
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
82
, pp.
575
587
.
10.
Cetin
,
M.
,
Hirsch
,
Ch.
,
Serovy
,
G. K.
, and
Ucer
,
A. S.
, 1989, “
An Off-Design Loss And Deviation Prediction Study For Transonic Axial Compressors
,” ASME Paper No. 89-GT-324.
11.
Creveling
,
H. F.
, and
Carmody
,
R. H.
, 1968, “
Axial Flow Compressor Computer Program for Calculating Off-Design Performance (Program IV)
,” General Motors, Allison Division, Indianapolis, Prepared for NASA, Report CR-72427.
12.
Aungier
,
R. H.
, 2003,
Axial-Flow Compressors: A Strategy For Aerodynamic Design And Analysis
,
ASME Press
,
New York
, pp.
204
207
.
13.
Miller
,
G. R.
,
Lewis
,
G. W.
, and
Hartmann
,
M. J.
, 1961, “
Shock Losses In Transonic Rotor Rows
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
83
, pp.
235
242
.
14.
Jansen
,
W.
, and
Moffatt
,
W. C.
, 1967, “
The Off-Design Analysis of Axial Flow Compressors
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
89
, pp.
453
462
.
15.
Schwenk
,
F. C.
,
Lewis
,
G. W.
, and
Hartman
,
M. J.
, 1957, “
A Preliminary Analysis of the Magnitude of Shock Losses in Transonic Compressors
,” NACA RM E57A30.
16.
Griepentrog
,
H. R.
, 1970, “
Secondary Flow Losses in Axial Compressors
,” AGARD LS 39.
17.
Howell
,
A. R.
, 1945, “
Fluid Dynamics of Axial Compressors
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
0020-3483,
153
, pp.
441
82
.
18.
Urasek
,
D. C.
,
William
,
T. G.
, and
Walter
,
S. C.
, 1979, “
Performance Of Two Stage Fan Having Low Aspect Ratio First Stage Rotor Blading
,” NASA Technical Paper 1493.
You do not currently have access to this content.