Abstract

In designing any machine element, we need to optimize the design to attain its maximum utilization. Herein, deep-groove ball bearings have been chosen for optimization. Optimization has been done in such a way that the design is robust so that manufacturing tolerances can be considered in the design. Robust design ensures that changes in design variables due to manufacturing tolerances have a minimum effect on the objective function, i.e., its performance. Robustness is achieved by maximizing the mean value of the objective function and minimizing its deviation. For rolling element bearings, its life is one of the most crucial considerations. The rolling bearing rating life depends on dynamic capacity, lubrication conditions, contamination, mounting, manufacturing accuracy, and material quality, and thus, the dynamic capacity and elasto-hydrodynamic minimum film thickness have been taken as objective functions for the current problem. Rolling element bearings have standard boundary dimensions, which include the outer diameter, inner diameter, and bearing width for the case of deep-groove ball bearings. So the performance can be improved by changing internal dimensions, which are the bearing pitch diameter, ball diameter, the inner and outer raceway groove curvature coefficients, and the number of rolling elements. These five internal geometrical parameters are taken as design variables; moreover, five design constraint factors are also included. Thirty-six constraint equations are considered, which are mainly based on geometry and strength considerations. In the present work, the objective functions are optimized individually (i.e., the single-objective optimization) and then simultaneously (i.e., the multi-objective optimization). Nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) has been used as the optimization tool. Pareto-optimal fronts are obtained for one of the bearings. Of many points on the Pareto-front, only the knee solutions have been presented . This paper shows that geometrically feasible bearings can be designed by optimizing multiple-objective functions simultaneously and by also incorporating the variations in dimensions, which occur due to manufacturing tolerance.

References

1.
Harris
,
T. A.
,
2001
,
Rolling Bearing Analysis
,
John Wiley and Sons
,
New York
.
2.
Chakraborty
,
I.
,
Kumar
,
V.
,
Nair
,
S. B.
, and
Tiwari
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Rolling Element Bearing Design Through Genetic Algorithms
,”
Eng. Optim.
,
35
(
6
), pp.
649
659
.
3.
Gupta
,
S.
,
Tiwari
,
R.
, and
Nair
,
S. B.
,
2007
, “
Multi-Objective Design Optimisation of Rolling Bearings Using Genetic Algorithms
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
42
(
10
), pp.
1418
1443
.
4.
Kalyan
,
M.
, and
Tiwari
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Multi-Objective Optimization of Needle Roller Bearings Based on Fatigue and Wear Using Evolutionary Algorithm
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J
,
230
(
2
), pp.
170
185
.
5.
Tiwari
,
R.
, and
Chandran
,
R. M.
,
2015
, “
Multitude of Objectives Based Optimum Designs of Cylindrical Roller Bearings With Evolutionary Methods
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
137
(
4
), p.
041504
.
6.
Deb
,
K.
,
Agrawal
,
S.
,
Pratap
,
A.
, and
Meyarivan
,
T.
,
2000
, “
A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II
,”
International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature
,
Paris, Prance
,
Sept. 18–20
, Springer, pp.
849
858
.
7.
Branke
,
J.
,
Deb
,
K.
,
Dierolf
,
H.
, and
Osswald
,
M.
,
2004
, “
Finding Knees in Multi-Objective Optimization
,”
International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature
,
Birmingham, UK
,
Sept. 18–22
, Springer, pp.
722
731
.
8.
Parkinson
,
A.
,
Sorensen
,
C.
, and
Pourhassan
,
N.
,
1993
, “
A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
115
(
1
), pp.
74
80
.
9.
Ben-Tal
,
A.
,
El Ghaoui
,
L.
, and
Nemirovski
,
A.
,
2009
,
Robust Optimization
,
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
.
10.
Messac
,
A.
, and
Ismail-Yahaya
,
A.
,
2002
, “
Multiobjective Robust Design Using Physical Programming
,”
Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim.
,
23
(
5
), pp.
357
371
.
11.
Chen
,
W.
,
Sahai
,
A.
,
Messac
,
A.
, and
Sundararaj
,
G. J.
,
2000
, “
Exploration of the Effectiveness of Physical Programming in Robust Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
2
), pp.
155
163
.
12.
Giassi
,
A.
,
Bennis
,
F.
, and
Maisonneuve
,
J.-J.
,
2004
, “
Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation and Robust Design Approaches Applied to Concurrent Design
,”
Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim.
,
28
(
5
), pp.
356
371
.
13.
Chidle
,
K.
, and
Baxi
,
R.
,
2016
, “
CFD Analysis of Fluid Film Journal Bearing: A Review
,”
Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
845
849
.
14.
Panda
,
S.
,
Panda
,
S.
,
Nanda
,
P.
, and
Mishra
,
D.
,
2015
, “
Comparative Study on Optimum Design of Rolling Element Bearing
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
92
, pp.
595
604
.
15.
Kim
,
S.-W.
,
Kang
,
K.
,
Yoon
,
K.
, and
Choi
,
D.-H.
,
2016
, “
Design Optimization of an Angular Contact Ball Bearing for the Main Shaft of a Grinder
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
104
, pp.
287
302
.
16.
Tudose
,
L.
,
Rusu
,
F.
, and
Tudose
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Optimal Design Under Uncertainty of Bearing Arrangements
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
98
, pp.
164
179
.
17.
Wang
,
Q.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Huang
,
W.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Liu
,
S.
, and
Savić
,
D. A.
,
2019
, “
Parameterization of NSGA-II for the Optimal Design of Water Distribution Systems
,”
Water
,
11
(
5
), p.
971
.
18.
Yuen
,
T. J.
, and
Ramli
,
R.
,
2020
, “
“Multi-Objective Optimization of All-Wheel Drive Electric Formula Vehicle for Performance and Energy Efficiency Using Evolutionary Algorithms
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D
,
234
(
5
), pp.
1472
1479
.
19.
Zou
,
J.
,
Ji
,
C.
,
Yang
,
S.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Zheng
,
J.
, and
Li
,
K.
,
2019
, “
A Knee-Point-Based Evolutionary Algorithm Using Weighted Subpopulation for Many-Objective Optimization
,”
Swarm Evol. Comput.
,
47
, pp.
33
43
.
20.
Santiago
,
A.
,
Dorronsoro
,
B.
,
Nebro
,
A. J.
,
Durillo
,
J. J.
,
Castillo
,
O.
, and
Fraire
,
H. J.
,
2019
, “
A Novel Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm With Fuzzy Logic Based Adaptive Selection of Operators: FAME
,”
Inf. Sci.
,
471
, pp.
233
251
.
21.
Reddy
,
A. S.
,
Agarwal
,
P. K.
, and
Chand
,
S.
, “
An Adaptive Multipopulation Genetic Algorithm for the Optimization of Active Magnetic Bearings
,”
Proc. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
,
IOP Publishing
,
Greater Noida, India
,
Nov. 8–9
, p.
012009
.
22.
Kang
,
K.
,
Kim
,
S.-W.
,
Yoon
,
K.
, and
Choi
,
D.-H.
,
2019
, “
Robust Design Optimization of an Angular Contact Ball Bearing Under Manufacturing Tolerance
,”
Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim.
,
60
(
4
), pp.
1645
1665
.
23.
Changsen
,
W.
,
1991
,
Analysis of Rolling Element Bearings
,
John Wiley & Sons Incorporated
.,
Hoboken, NJ
.
24.
Datta
,
R.
, and
Deb
,
K.
, “
An Adaptive Normalization Based Constrained Handling Methodology With Hybrid Bi-Objective and Penalty Function Approach
,”
Proc. 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation
,
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
,
June 10–15
, IEEE, pp.
1
8
.
25.
Hamrock
,
B. J.
, and
Anderson
,
W. J.
,
1983
, “
Rolling-Element bearings
,”
NASA Reference Publication 1105
.
26.
Brewe
,
D. E.
, and
Hamrock
,
B. J.
,
1977
, “
Simplified Solution for Elliptical-Contact Deformation Between Two Elastic Solids
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
99
(
4
), pp.
485
487
.
27.
McAllister
,
C. D.
, and
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
2003
, “
Multidisciplinary Robust Design Optimization of an Internal Combustion Engine
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
125
(
1
), pp.
124
130
.
28.
Deb
,
K.
,
2001
,
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
.
29.
Deb
,
K.
,
2005
, “
Multi-Objective NSGA-II Code
,”
John Wiley & Sons
, Retrieved from https://www.egr.msu.edu/∼kdeb/codes.shtml, Accessed June 21, 2000.
30.
Hamrock
,
B. J.
,
Schmid
,
S. R.
, and
Jacobson
,
B. O.
,
2004
,
Fundamentals of Fluid Film Lubrication
, 2nd ed.,
CRC Press
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.