A high-speed photographic study has been made of the chip-tool interface and its evolution when cutting pure metals with optically transparent sapphire tools. The use of a high speed camera in conjunction with an optical microscope has enabled details of the interface, including the velocity field along the interface, to be resolved at high spatial and temporal resolution while cutting at speeds between 1 mm/sec and 2000 mm/sec. The results show the chip-tool contact along this interface to be composed of four distinct regions: a region of stagnation at the cutting edge, a region of retardation adjoining the stagnation region, a region of sliding beyond the retardation region, followed by a region of metal transfer or “sticking” that is located furthest away from the cutting edge alongside the boundary of the contact. The chip and tool appear to be in intimate contact over the stagnation, retardation, and sliding regions, with sliding occurring at the interface over much of this zone of intimate contact. These observations have provided direct experimental evidence for a model of the contact conditions proposed by Enahoro and Oxley based on analytical considerations. Cutting experiments with non-oxide tools such as aluminum and high speed steel suggest that this description conditions is equally applicable to tool materials other than sapphire.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
mechanical contact, interface phenomena, machine tools, machining, sliding friction, adhesion, optical images, image resolution
Topics:
Cutting, Metals
1.
Shaw, M. C., 1984, Metal Cutting Principles, Oxford University Press, New York.
2.
Trent, E. M., 1977, Metal Cutting, Butterworth and Co., London.
3.
Zorev, N. N., 1963, “Interrelationship Between Shear Processes Ocurring Along Tool Face and on Shear Plane in Metal Cutting,” Proceedings of the International Production Engineering Research Council, ASME, New York, p. 42.
4.
Finnie
,
I.
, and
Shaw
,
M. C.
,
1956
, “
The Friction Process in Metal Cutting
,”
Trans. ASME
,
78
, pp.
1649
–
1657
.
5.
Bailey
,
J. A.
,
1975
, “
Friction in Metal Machining—Mechanical Aspects
,”
Wear
,
31
, pp.
243
–
275
.
6.
Zorev, N. N., 1958, “Results of Work in the Field of Mechanics of the Metal Cutting Process,” Proceedings of the Conference on Technology of Engineering Manufacture, Institute of Mechanical Engineers, London (U.K.), pp. 225–270.
7.
Trent, E. M., 1967, “Conditions of Seizure at the Chip-Tool Interface,” Special Report, Machinability, Iron and Steel Institute, 94, pp. 11–18.
8.
Horne, J. G., Doyle, E. D., and Tabor, D., 1977, “Direct Observation of Chip-Tool Interface in Metal Cutting,” Proceedings of the Fifth North American Metalworking Research Conference, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, pp. 237–240.
9.
Doyle
,
E. D.
,
Horne
,
J. G.
, and
Tabor
,
D.
,
1979
, “
Frictional Interactions Between Chip and Rake Face in Continuous Chip Formation
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
A366
, pp.
173
–
187
.
10.
Enahoro
,
H. E.
, and
Oxley
,
P. L. B.
,
1966
, “
Flow Along Tool-Chip Interface in Orthogonal Metal Cutting
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
8
, pp.
36
–
41
.
11.
Madhavan
,
V.
,
Chandrasekar
,
S.
, and
Farris
,
T. N.
,
2002
, “
Direct Observations of the Chip-Tool Interface in the Low-Speed Cutting of Pure Metals
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
124
(
3
), pp.
617
–
626
.
12.
Wallace
,
P. W.
, and
Boothroyd
,
G.
,
1964
, “
Tool Forces and Tool Chip Friction in Orthogonal Machining
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
6
, pp.
74
–
87
.
13.
Nakayama
,
K.
,
1959
, “
Studies of the Mechanism of Metal Cutting
,”
Bull. Fac. Eng. Yokohama Nat. Univ. Japan
,
8
, pp.
1
–
26
.
14.
Wright, P. K., and Trent, E. M., 1974, “Metallurgical Appraisal of Wear Mechanisms and Processes on High Speed Tools,” Met. Technol. (London), p. 13.
15.
Kattwinkel
,
W.
,
1957
, “
Experimentation of Cutting Action by Means of Photoelasticity,” (in German)
Ind. Anzeig
,
36
, p.
525
525
.
16.
Usui
,
E.
, and
Takeyama
,
H.
,
1960
, “
A Photoelastic Analysis of Machining Stresses
,”
J. Eng. Ind.
,
82
, pp.
303
–
308
.
17.
Chandrasekaran
,
H.
, and
Kapoor
,
D. V.
,
1965
, “
Photoelastic Analysis of Tool-Chip Interface Stresses
,”
J. Eng. Ind.
,
87
, pp.
495
–
502
.
18.
Bagchi
,
A.
, and
Wright
,
P. K.
,
1987
, “
Stress Analysis in Machining With the Use of Sapphire Tools
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
409
, pp.
99
–
113
.
19.
Madhavan, V., Chandrasekar, S., and Farris, T. N., 1997, “Direct Observations of the Chip-Tool Interface in Machining,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Manufacturing Science and Engineering, ASME, New York, pp. 45–52.
20.
Williams
,
J. A.
, and
Tabor
,
D.
,
1977
, “
The Role of Lubricants in Machining
,”
Wear
,
43
, pp.
275
–
292
.
21.
Pepper
,
S.
,
1979
, “
Effect of Interfacial Species on Shear Strength of Metal-Sapphire Contacts
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
,
50
, pp.
8062
–
8066
.
22.
Ackroyd, B., Chandrasekar, S., and Compton, W. D., 2000, “High Speed Photographic Study of the Tool-Chip Interface in Machining,” Proceedings of the 26th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 473–484.
23.
Dewhurst, P., 1978, “On the Non-Uniqueness of the Machining Process,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A360, p. 587.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.