Parabolic trough power systems that utilize concentrated solar energy to generate electricity are a proven technology. Industry and laboratory research efforts are now focusing on integration of thermal energy storage as a viable means to enhance dispatchability of concentrated solar energy. One option to significantly reduce costs is to use thermocline storage systems, low-cost filler materials as the primary thermal storage medium, and molten nitrate salts as the direct heat transfer fluid. Prior thermocline evaluations and thermal cycling tests at the Sandia National Laboratories’ National Solar Thermal Test Facility identified quartzite rock and silica sand as potential filler materials. An expanded series of isothermal and thermal cycling experiments were planned and implemented to extend those studies in order to demonstrate the durability of these filler materials in molten nitrate salts over a range of operating temperatures for extended time frames. Upon test completion, careful analyses of filler material samples, as well as the molten salt, were conducted to assess long-term durability and degradation mechanisms in these test conditions. Analysis results demonstrate that the quartzite rock and silica sand appear able to withstand the molten salt environment quite well. No significant deterioration that would impact the performance or operability of a thermocline thermal energy storage system was evident. Therefore, additional studies of the thermocline concept can continue armed with confidence that appropriate filler materials have been identified for the intended application.

1.
Kearney and Associates, 2001, “Engineering Evaluation of a Molten Salt HTF in a Parabolic Trough Solar Field,” NREL Contract No. NAA-1-30441-04, (dates vary).
2.
USA Trough Initiative, 2000, “Task 2 Report: Thermal Storage for Rankine Cycle Power Plants,” Nexant LLC under Task Order Authorization Number KAF-9-29765-09, San Francisco, California, February 8.
3.
Kearney, D., et al., 2000, “Evaluation of a Molten Salt Heat Transfer Fluid in a Parabolic Trough Solar Field,” draft paper for Solar 2002 Proceedings, June.
4.
Price
,
H.
et al.
,
2002
, “
Advances in Parabolic Trough Solar Power Technology
,”
ASME J. Solar Energy Eng.
, Special Issue: Solar Thermal Power,
124
(
2
), pp.
109
125
.
5.
Kearney and Associates, 2001, “Engineering Evaluation of a Molten Salt HTF in a Parabolic Trough Solar Field, Task 6 Report: Final System Performance and Cost Comparisons,” NREL Contract No. NAA-1-30441-04, August 20.
6.
Pacheco
,
J.
,
Showalter
,
S.
, and
Kolb
,
W.
,
2002
, “
Development of a Molten-Salt Thermocline Thermal Storage System for Parabolic Trough Plants
,”
ASME J. Solar Energy Eng.
, Special Issue: Solar Thermal Power,
124
(
2
), pp.
153
159
.
7.
Bradshaw, R. W., and Tyner, C. E., 1988, “Chemical and Engineering Factors Affecting Solar Central Receiver Applications of Ternary Molten Salts,” SAND88-8686, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, July.
8.
Bradshaw, R. W., and Meeker, D. E., 1989, “Chemical Equilibria of Molten Ternary Nitrate Salt Mixtures,” SAND88-8845, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, May.
9.
Thermocline Storage Filler Material Thermal Cycling Test Plan, Sandia National Laboratories, May 2002.
You do not currently have access to this content.