This paper considers two distinct topics that arise in reliability-based wind turbine design. First, it illustrates how general probability models can be used to predict long-term design loads from a set of limited-duration, short-term load histories. Second, it considers in detail the precise choice of probability model to be adopted, for both flap and edge bending loads in both parked and operating turbine conditions. In particular, a 3-moment random peak model and a 3- or 4-moment random process model are applied and compared. For a parked turbine, all models are found to be virtually unbiased and to notably reduce uncertainty in estimating extreme loads (e.g., by roughly 50%). For an operating turbine, however, only the random peak model is found to retain these beneficial features. This suggests the advantage of the random peak model, which appears to capture the rotating blade behavior sufficiently well to accurately predict extremes.

1.
IEC/TC8, 1998. 61400-1 Wind Turbine Generator Systems-Part 1: Safety Requirements, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
2.
McCoy, T. J., Malcom, D. J., and Griffin, D. A., 1999, “An Approach to the Development of Turbine Loads in Accordance with IEC 1400-1 and ISO 2394.” A collection of the 1999 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, at the 37th AIAA Areospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA-99-0020, Reno NV, pp. 1–9.
3.
Fitzwater, L. M., and Winterstein, S. R., 2000, “Estimation of Extremes from Limited Time Histories: The Routine MaxFits with Wind Turbine Examples,” Tech. Rep. RMS–39, Reliability of Marine Structures Program, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Stanford University, Stanford, California (Under review for publication as a technical report by Sandia National Laboratory).
4.
Madsen, P. H., Pierce, K., and Buhl, M., 1999, “Predicting Ultimate Loads for Wind Turbine Design,” A Collection of the 1999 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, at the 37th AIAA Areospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA-99-0069, Reno NV, pp. 355–364.
5.
Hansen, A. C., 1996, Users Guide to the Wind Turbine Dynamics Computer Programs YawDyn and AeroDyn for ADAMS, Mechanical Engineering Dept., University of Utah, Salt Lake City UT.
6.
Winterstein
,
S. R.
,
1988
, “
Nonlinear Vibration Models for Extremes and Fatigue
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
,
114
(
10
), pp.
1772
1790
.
7.
Jha, A. K., and Winterstein, S. R., 1997, “Nonlinear Random Ocean Waves: Prediction and Comparison with Data,” Tech. Rep. RMS–24, Reliability of Marine Structures Program, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept. Stanford University, Stanford, California.
8.
Jha, A. K., and Winterstein, S. R., 2000, “Nonlinear Random Ocean Waves: Prediction and Comparison with Data,” Proc. 19th Int. Offshore Mechanical Arctic Engineering Symp., ASME Paper No. OMEA 00-6125, pp. 1–12.
9.
Lange, C. H., and Winterstein, S. R., 1996, “Fatigue Design of Wind Turbine Blades: Load and Resistance Factors from Limited Data,” Wind Eng., ASME, pp. 93–101.
10.
Ronold
,
K. O.
,
Wedel-Heinen
,
J.
, and
Christensen
,
C. J.
,
1999
, “
Reliability-Based Fatigue Design of Wind Turbine Rotor Blades
,”
Eng. Struct.
,
21
, pp.
1101
1114
.
11.
Winterstein, S. R., and Kashef, T., 1999, “Moment-Based Load and Response Models with Wind Engineering Applications,” A Collection of the 1999 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, at the 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA-99-0068, Reno NV, pp. 122–128.
12.
Winterstein, S. R., Kleiven, G., and O̸istein, H., 2001, “Comparing Extreme Wave Estimates from Hourly and Annual Data,” to appear: Proc. ISOPE-2001, ISOPE.
13.
Haver, S., Sagli, G., and Gran, T., 1998, “Long Term Response Analysis of Fixed and Floating Structures,” Proc. Wave’98–Ocean Wave Kinematics, Dynamics and Loads on Structures, Int. OTRC Symp., pp. 240–248.
14.
Winterstein, S. R., and Engebretsen, K., 1998, “Reliability-Based Prediction of Design Loads and Responses for Floating Ocean Structures,” Proc. of 17th Int. Offshore Mechanical Artic Engineering Symp., ASME Paper No. OMAE 98-1381.
You do not currently have access to this content.