Autocorrelated residuals from regression models of building energy use present problems when attempting to estimate retrofit energy savings and the uncertainty of the savings. This paper discusses the causes of autocorrelation in energy use models and proposes a method to deal with autocorrelation. A hybrid of ordinary least squares (OLS) and autoregressive (AR) models is developed to accurately predict energy use and give reasonable uncertainty estimates. Only linear models are considered because both the data and the physical theory for many commercial buildings support this choice (Kissock, 1993). A procedure for model selection is presented and tested on data from three commercial buildings participating in the Texas LoanSTAR program. In every case examined, the hybrid OLS-AR model provided the best estimate of energy use and the most robust estimate of uncertainty.

1.
Claridge, D.E., Haberl, J. S., Turner, W. D., O’Neal, D., Heffington, W., Tombari, C, Roberts, M., Jaeger, S., 1991, “Improving Energy Conservation Retrofits With Measured Savings,” ASHRAE Journal, October.
2.
Fels, M,, (ed.) 1986, “Special Issue Devoted to Measuring Energy Savings, The Scorekeeping Approach,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 9, Nos. 1 and 2.
3.
Kissock, J. K., Claridge, D. E., Haberl, J, S., and Reddy, T. A., 1992, “Measuring Retrofit Savings for the Texas LoanSTAR Program: Preliminary Methodology and Results,” Proceedings of the ASME/JSES/KSES International Solar Energy Conference, Hawaii, March.
4.
Kissock, J. K., 1993, “A Methodology to Measure Retrofit Energy Savings in Commercial Buildings,” Ph.D dissertation. Mechanical Eng. Dept, Texas A&M University, December.
5.
Kissock, J. K., 1993, “EModel,” Copyright Texas Engineering Experimental Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, January.
6.
MacDonald M., 1988, “Power Signatures as Characteristics of Commercial and Related Buildings,” Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Symposium on Improving Building Energy Efficiency in Hot and Humid Climates, Texas A University, College Station, Texas.
7.
MacDonald, M., and Wasserman, D., 1988, “Investigation of Metered Data Analysis Methods for Commercial and Related Buildings,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/CON-279, May .
8.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kutner, M., 1990, Applied Linear Statistical Models, Irwin, Boston, MA,
9.
Reddy, T. A., Kissock, J. K., and Claridge, D. E., 1992, “Uncertainty Analysis in Estimating Building Energy Retrofit Savings in the LoanSTAR Program,” Proceedings of the 1992 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, August-September.
10.
Reynolds, C., Komor, P., and Fels, M., 1990, “Using Monthly Billing Data to Find Energy Efficiency Opportunities in Small Commercial Buildings,” Proceedings of the 1990 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Washington, D.C., Vol. 10, pp. 10.221–10.232.
11.
Ruch, D., and Claridge, D., 1991, “A Four Parameter Change-Point Model for Predicting Energy Consumption in Commercial Buildings,” Proceedings of 1991 ASMS Solar Energy Division Meeting, March.
12.
Ruch, D., and Claridge, D., 1992, “NAC for Linear and Change-Point Energy Models,” Proceedings of the 1992 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency In Buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, August-September.
13.
Ruch, D, K., Kissock, J. K., and Reddy, T. A., 1993, “Model Identification and Prediction Uncertainty of Linear Building Energy Use Models with Autocorrelated Residuals,” Solar Energy 1993 Proceedings of the ASME International Solar Energy Conference, pp. 465–473, Washington, D.C., April.
14.
Ruch, D., 1992, “Hybrid Energy Models,” Energy Systems Laboratory Technical Report, Texas A&M University, August 1992.
15.
SAS 1993, SAS/ETS User’s Guide, Version 6, Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute, Inc.
16.
SAS 1989, SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2, Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute Inc.
17.
Theil, H., 1971. Principles of Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
18.
Verdi, A., 1989, “Exploratory Data Analysis of Summer Load Profiles for Small Commercial Customers,” Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Princeton University, PU/CEES Working Paper #107.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.