A mathematical model for collisions between birds and propellor-type turbine rotors identifies the variables that can be manipulated to reduce the probability that birds will collide with the rotor. This study defines a safety index—the “clearance power density”—that allows rotors of different sizes and designs to be compared in terms of the amount of wind energy converted to electrical energy per bird collision. The collision model accounts for variations in wind speed during the year and shows that for model rotors with simple, one-dimensional blades, the safety index increases in proportion to rotor diameter, and variable speed rotors have higher safety indexes than constant speed rotors. The safety index can also be increased by enlarging the region near the center of the rotor hub where the blades move slowly enough for birds to avoid them. Painting the blades to make them more visible might have this effect. Model rotors with practical designs can have safety indexes an order of magnitude higher that those for model rotors typical of the constant speed rotors in common use today. This finding suggests that redesigned rotors could have collision rates with birds perhaps an order of magnitude lower than today’s rotors, with no reduction in the production of wind power. The empirical data that exist for collisions between raptors, such as hawks and eagles, and rotors are consistent with the model: the numbers of raptor carcasses found beneath large variable speed rotors, relative to the numbers found under small constant speed rotors, are in the proportions predicted by the collision model rather than in proportion to the areas swept by the rotor blades. However, uncontrolled variables associated with these data prevent a stronger claim of support for the model.

1.
Frost, W., and Aspliden, C, 1994, “Characteristics of the Wind,” Wind Turbine Technology, D. A. Spera, ed., ASME Press, New York, pp. 371–445.
2.
Howell, J. A., 1995, “Avian Mortality at Rotor Swept Area Equivalents, Altamont Pass and Montezuma Hills, California,” A Report to Kenetech Windpower from Judd Howell & Associates, 3030 Bridgeway, Suite 119, Sausalito, CA 94965.
3.
Shimizu
Y.
,
Imamura
H.
,
Matsumura
S.
,
Maeda
T.
, and
van Bussel
G. J. W.
,
1995
, “
Power Augmentation of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Using a Mie Type Tip Vane: Velocity Distribution Around the Tip of a HAWT Blade With and Without a Mie Type Tip Vane
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING
, Vol.
117
, pp.
297
303
.
4.
Spera, D. A., 1994, “Introduction to Modern Wind Turbines,” Wind Turbine Technology, D. A. Spera, ed., ASME Press, New York, pp. 47–72.
5.
Tamkins
T.
,
1993
, “
Tilting at Wind Power: Wind is Clean and Efficient—and It Can Kill Eagles
,”
Audubon
, Vol.
95
, No.
3
, p.
24
24
.
6.
Tucker
V. A.
,
1996
, “
A Mathematical Model of Bird Collisions with Wind Turbine Rotors
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING
, Vol.
118
, pp.
253
262
.
7.
Wilson, R. E., 1994, “Aerodynamic Behavior of Wind Turbines,” Wind Turbine Technology, D. A. Spera, ed., ASME Press, New York, pp. 215–282.
8.
Weisman
J.
,
1995
, “
Tilting at Windmills
,”
Wildlife Conservation
, Vol.
97
, No.
1
, pp.
52
57
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.