A method for applying probabilistic models to concentrating solar-thermal power plants is described in this paper. The benefits of using probabilistic models include quantification of uncertainties inherent in the system and characterization of their impact on system performance and economics. Sensitivity studies using stepwise regression analysis can identify and rank the most important parameters and processes as a means to prioritize future research and activities. The probabilistic method begins with the identification of uncertain variables and the assignment of appropriate distributions for those variables. Those parameters are then sampled using a stratified method (Latin hypercube sampling) to ensure complete and representative sampling from each distribution. Models of performance, reliability, and cost are then simulated multiple times using the sampled set of parameters. The results yield a cumulative distribution function that can be used to quantify the probability of exceeding (or being less than) a particular value. Two examples, a simple cost model and a more detailed performance model of a hypothetical 100-MWe power tower, are provided to illustrate the methods.

1.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations
, 2008, “
Requirements for Performance Assessment
,” Title 10, Part 63, Section 114.
2.
1993,
Second-Generation Central Receiver Technologies: A Status Report
,
M.
Becker
and
P. C.
Klimas
, eds.,
C.F. Muller
,
Karlsruhe, Germany
.
3.
Wyss
,
G. D.
, and
Jorgensen
,
K. H.
, 1998, “
A User’s Guide to LHS: Sandia’s Latin Hypercube Sampling Software
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND98-0210.
4.
Blower
,
S. M.
, and
Dowlatabadi
,
H.
, 1994, “
Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Complex Models of Disease Transmission: An HIV Model, as an Example
,”
Int. Statist. Rev.
0306-7734,
62
(
2
), pp.
229
243
.
5.
Helton
,
J. C.
, and
Davis
,
F. J.
, 2000, “
Sampling-Based Methods for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND99-2240.
6.
Falcone
,
P. K.
, 1986, “
A Handbook for Solar Central Receiver Design
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND86-8009.
7.
Sargent & Lundy Consulting Group
, 2003, “
Assessment of Parabolic Trough and Power Tower Solar Technology Cost and Performance Forecasts
,” Report No. SL-5641.
8.
Stoddard
,
M. C.
,
Faas
,
S. E.
,
Chiang
,
C. J.
, and
Dirks
,
J. A.
, 1987, “
SOLERGY—A Computer Code for Calculating the Annual Energy From Central Receiver Power Plants
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND86-8060.
9.
Alpert
,
D. J.
, and
Kolb
,
G. J.
, 1988, “
Performance of the Solar One Power Plant as Simulated by the SOLERGY Computer Code
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND88-0321.
10.
Gilman
,
P.
,
Blair
,
N.
,
Mehos
,
M.
,
Christenson
,
C.
,
Janzou
,
S.
, and
Cameron
,
C.
, 2008, “
Solar Advisor Model User Guide for Version 2.0
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. NREL/TP-670-43704.
11.
Radosevich
,
L. G.
, 1988, “
Final Report on the Power Production Phase of the 10 MWe Solar Thermal Central Receiver Pilot Plant
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND87-8022.
12.
Etievant
,
C.
, 1988, “
Central Receiver Plant Evaluation III, Themis Receiver Subsystem Evaluation
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND88-8101.
13.
Smith
,
D. C.
, and
Chavez
,
J. M.
, 1988,
A Final Report on the Phase 1 Testing of a Molten-Salt Cavity Receiver – Volume 1 – A Summary Report
, Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND87-2290.
14.
Boehm
,
R.
,
Nakhaie
,
H.
, and
Berg
,
D.
, Jr.
, 1988, “
Heat Loss Experiments on the Category B Solar Receiver
,”
Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ASME Solar Energy Conference
, Denver, CO, Apr. 10–14.
15.
Siebers
,
D. L.
, and
Kraabel
,
J. S.
, 1986, “
Estimating Convective Energy Losses From Solar Central Receivers
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND84-8717.
16.
Rush
,
E. E.
, Jr.
,
Chavez
,
J. M.
,
Smith
,
D. C.
, and
Matthews
,
C. W.
, 1991, “
Report on Tests of the Molten Salt Pump and Valve Loops
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Solar Energy Conference
, Reno, NV, Apr.
17.
Pharabod
,
F.
,
Bezian
,
J. J.
,
Bonduelle
,
B.
,
Rivoire
,
B.
, and
Guillard
,
J.
, 1986, “
Themis Evaluation Report
,”
Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Solar-Thermal Central Receiver Systems: Volume 1
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
18.
Kolb
,
G. J.
, and
Lopez
,
C. W.
, 1988, “
Reliability of the Solar One Plant During the Power Production Phase
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND88-2664.
19.
Price
,
H.
, 1990, private communication.
20.
North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC)
, 1989, “
Data Reporting Instructions for Generating Availability Data System
,” data scan for coolwater combined-cycle plants from 1982 to 1988, Princeton, NJ, Oct.
You do not currently have access to this content.