Abstract

In this article, a method is proposed to conduct a global sensitivity analysis of epistemic uncertainty on both system input and system structure, which is very common in early stage of system development, using Dempster-Shafer theory (DST). In system reliability assessment, the input corresponds to component reliability and system structure is given by system reliability function, cut sets, or truth table. A method to propagate real-number mass function through set-valued mappings is introduced and applied on system reliability calculation. Secondly, we propose a method to model uncertain system with multiple possible structures and how to obtain the mass function of system level reliability. Finally, we propose an indicator for global sensibility analysis. Our method is illustrated, and its efficacy is proved by numerical application on two case studies.

References

1.
Aven
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Interpretations of Alternative Uncertainty Representations in a Reliability and Risk Analysis Context
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
96
(
3
), pp.
353
360
.10.1016/j.ress.2010.11.004
2.
Aguirre Martinez
,
F.
,
Sallak
,
M.
, and
Schon
,
W.
,
2015
, “
An Efficient Method for Reliability Analysis of Systems Under Epistemic Uncertainty Using Belief Function Theory
,”
IEEE Trans. Reliab.
,
64
(
3
), pp.
893
909
.10.1109/TR.2015.2434946
3.
Lindenschmidt
,
K.-E.
,
Fleischbein
,
K.
, and
Baborowski
,
M.
,
2007
, “
Structural Uncertainty in a River Water Quality Modelling System
,”
Ecol. Modell.
,
204
(
3–4
), pp.
289
300
.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.01.004
4.
Xiong
,
C.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Liu
,
G.
, and
Shi
,
Q.
,
2019
, “
An Iterative Dimension-by-Dimension Method for Structural Interval Response Prediction With Multidimensional Uncertain Variables
,”
Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
,
86
, pp.
572
581
.10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.032
5.
Dempster
,
A. P.
,
2008
, “
Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping
,”
Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions
,
Springer
,
Berlin
, pp.
57
72
.
6.
Dubois
,
D.
, and
Prade
,
H.
,
2012
,
Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty
,
Springer Science & Business Media
,
New York
.
7.
Walley
,
P.
, and
Fine
,
T. L.
,
1982
, “
Towards a Frequentist Theory of Upper and Lower Probability
,”
Ann. Stat.
,
10
(
3
), pp.
741
761
.10.1214/aos/1176345868
8.
Aguirre
,
F.
,
Sallak
,
M.
, and
Schön
,
W.
,
2013
, “
Construction of Belief Functions From Statistical Data About Reliability Under Epistemic Uncertainty
,”
IEEE Trans. Reliab.
,
62
(
3
), pp.
555
568
.10.1109/TR.2013.2273047
9.
Wang
,
L.
, and
Xiong
,
C.
,
2019
, “
A Novel Methodology of Sequential Optimization and Non-Probabilistic Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis for Multidisciplinary Systems
,”
Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
,
94
, p.
105389
.10.1016/j.ast.2019.105389
10.
Wang
,
L.
,
Xiong
,
C.
,
Wang
,
X.
,
Liu
,
G.
, and
Shi
,
Q.
,
2019
, “
Sequential Optimization and Fuzzy Reliability Analysis for Multidisciplinary Systems
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
,
60
(
3
), pp.
1079
1095
.10.1007/s00158-019-02258-y
11.
Zadeh
,
L. A.
,
1986
, “
A Simple View of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence and Its Implication for the Rule of Combination
,”
AI Mag.
,
7
(
2
), pp.
85
85
.10.1609/aimag.v7i2.542
12.
Wang
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
K.
, and
Deng
,
Y.
,
2019
, “
Base Belief Function: An Efficient Method of Conflict Management
,”
J. Ambient Intell. Human. Comput.
,
10
(
9
), pp.
3427
3437
.10.1007/s12652-018-1099-2
13.
Shafer
,
G.
,
1976
,
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
, Vol.
42
,
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
.
14.
Smets
,
P.
,
2005
, “
Belief Functions on Real Numbers
,”
Int. J. Approx. Reason.
,
40
(
3
), pp.
181
223
.10.1016/j.ijar.2005.04.001
15.
Denoeux
,
T.
,
2008
, “
A k-Nearest Neighbor Classification Rule Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory
,”
In Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions
,
Springer
,
Berlin
, pp.
737
760
.
16.
Deng
,
Y.
,
2016
, “
Deng Entropy
,”
Chaos, Solitons Fractals
,
91
, pp.
549
553
.10.1016/j.chaos.2016.07.014
17.
Jiang
,
W.
,
Wei
,
B.
,
Liu
,
X.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Zheng
,
H.
,
2018
, “
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Power Aggregation Operator Based on Entropy and Its Application in Decision Making
,”
Int. J. Intell. Syst.
,
33
(
1
), pp.
49
67
.10.1002/int.21939
18.
Denœux
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Extending Stochastic Ordering to Belief Functions on the Real Line
,”
Inf. Sci.
,
179
(
9
), pp.
1362
1376
.10.1016/j.ins.2009.01.009
19.
Ristic
,
B.
, and
Smets
,
P.
,
2006
, “
Belief Function Theory on the Continuous Space With an Application to Model Based Classification
,”
Modern Information Processing
,
Elsevier
,
Oxford, UK
, pp.
11
24
.
20.
Marques
,
M.
,
Ynuhui
,
H.
, and
Marrel
,
A.
,
2018
, “
Propagation of Epistemic Uncertainties Using Dempster-Shafer Theory in BEPU Evaluation
,” ANS Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty International Conference (
BEPU 2018
), Lucc, Italy, May 13–18, Paper No. 167.https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02415473/document
21.
Blatman
,
G.
,
2009
, “
Adaptive Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions for Uncertainty Propagation and Sensitivity Analysis
,” Ph.D. thesis, Clermont-Ferrand 2, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
22.
Kleijnen
,
J. P.
,
1997
, “
Sensitivity Analysis and Related Analyses: A Review of Some Statistical Techniques
,”
J. Stat. Comput. Simul.
,
57
(
1–4
), pp.
111
142
.10.1080/00949659708811805
23.
Kerkvliet
,
T.
, and
Meester
,
R.
,
2018
, “
A Behavioral Interpretation of Belief Functions
,”
J. Theor. Probab.
,
31
(
4
), pp.
2112
2128
.10.1007/s10959-017-0776-y
24.
Eryilmaz
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Review of Recent Advances in Reliability of Consecutive k-Out-of-n and Related Systems
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O
,
224
(
3
), pp.
225
237
.10.1243/1748006XJRR332
25.
Qiu
,
S.
,
Sallak
,
M.
,
Schön
,
W.
, and
Ming
,
H. X.
,
2018
, “
Extended LK Heuristics for the Optimization of Linear Consecutive-k-Out-of-n: F Systems Considering Parametric Uncertainty and Model Uncertainty
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
175
, pp.
51
61
.10.1016/j.ress.2018.01.016
26.
Baudrit
,
C.
,
Couso
,
I.
, and
Dubois
,
D.
,
2007
, “
Joint Propagation of Probability and Possibility in Risk Analysis: Towards a Formal Framework
,”
Int. J. Approx. Reason.
,
45
(
1
), pp.
82
105
.10.1016/j.ijar.2006.07.001
You do not currently have access to this content.