Abstract

Critical infrastructure networks are geographically distributed systems spanning multiple scales. These networks are increasingly interdependent for normal operations, which causes localized asset failures from natural hazards or man-made interference to propagate across multiple networks, affecting those far removed from an initiating failure event. This paper provides methodology to identify such failure propagation effects by quantifying the spatial variability in magnitude, frequency, and disruptive reach of failures across national infrastructure networks. To achieve this, we present methodology to combine functionally interdependent infrastructure networks with geographic interdependencies by simulating complete asset failures across a national scale grid of spatially localized hazards. A range of metrics are introduced to compare the systemic vulnerabilities of infrastructure systems and the resulting spatial variability in both the potential for initiating widespread failures and the risk of being impacted by distant hazards. We demonstrate the approach through an application in New Zealand of infrastructures across the energy (electricity, petroleum supply), water and waste (water supply, wastewater, solid waste), telecommunications (mobile networks), and transportation sectors (passenger rail, ferry, air, and state highways). In addition to identifying nationally significant systemic vulnerabilities, we observe that nearly half (46%) of the total disruptions across the simulation set can be attributed to network propagation initiated asset failures. This highlights the importance in considering interdependencies when assessing infrastructure risks and prioritizing investment decisions for enhancing resilience of national networks.

References

1.
Rinaldi
,
S. M.
,
Peerenboom
,
J. P.
, and
Kelly
,
T. K.
,
2001
, “
Identifying, Understanding, and Analyzing Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies
,”
IEEE Control Syst. Mag.
,
21
(
6
), pp.
11
25
.10.1109/37.969131
2.
Pederson
,
P.
,
Dudenhoeffer
,
D.
,
Hartley
,
S.
, and
Permann
,
M.
,
2006
, “
Critical Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling: A Survey of U.S. and International Research
,” Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, Report No.
INL/EXT-06-11464
.http://cip.management.dal.ca/publications/Critical%20Infrastructure%20Interdependency%20Modeling.pdf
3.
McDaniels
,
T.
,
Chang
,
S.
,
Peterson
,
K.
,
Mikawoz
,
J.
, and
Reed
,
D.
,
2007
, “
Empirical Framework for Characterizing Infrastructure Failure Interdependencies
,”
J. Infrastructure Syst.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
175
184
.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:3(175)
4.
Johansson
,
J.
, and
Hassel
,
H.
,
2010
, “
An Approach for Modelling Interdependent Infrastructures in the Context of Vulnerability Analysis
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
95
, pp.
1335
1344
.10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.010
5.
Pant
,
R.
,
Hall
,
J. W.
, and
Blainey
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Vulnerability Assessment Framework for Interdependent Critical Infrastructures: Case-Study for Great Britain's Rail Network
,”
Eur. J. Transp. Infrastructure Res.
,
16
, pp.
174
194
.
6.
Thacker
,
S.
,
Pant
,
R.
, and
Hall
,
J. W.
,
2017
, “
System-of-Systems Formulation and Disruption Analysis for Multi-Scale Critical National Infrastructures
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
, 167, pp.
30
41
.10.1016/j.ress.2017.04.023
7.
Ouyang
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Review on Modeling and Simulation of Interdependent Critical Infrastructure Systems
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
121
, pp.
43
60
.10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040
8.
Bologna
,
S.
, and
Setola
,
R.
,
2005
, “
The Need to Improve Local Self-Awareness in CIP/CIIP
,”
First IEEE International Workshop on Critical Infrastructure Protection
, Darmstadt, Germany, Nov. 3–4, p.
6
.10.1109/IWCIP.2005.19
9.
Lehmann
,
E.
,
2014
, “
Infrastructure Threatened by Climate Change Poses a National Crisis
,” Scientific American, accessed Feb. 27, 2020, https://www.scientificamerican.com/
10.
Press Association
,
2017
, “
British Airways IT Failure Caused by ‘Uncontrolled Return of Power’
,” The Guardian (Guardian Media Group), accessed Feb. 27, 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/
11.
Kemp
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Living Without Electricity: One City's Experience of Coping With Loss of Power
,” Royal Academcy of Engineering, London, accessed Apr. 1, 2019, https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/living-without-electricity
12.
Rong
,
M.
,
Han
,
C.
, and
Liu
,
L.
,
2010
, “
Critical Infrastructure Failure Interdependencies in the 2008 Chinese Winter Storms
,”
IEEE 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science
(
MASS
), Wuhan, China, Aug. 24–26, pp.
1
4
.10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5576239
13.
White House
,
2013
, “
Presidential Policy Directive—Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience—PPD 21
,” White House, Washington DC, accessed Apr. 1, 2019, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directive-critical-infrastructure-security-and-resil
14.
Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management
,
2017
, “
National Disaster Resilience Strategy Development
,” Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management, Wellington, New Zealand, accessed Apr. 1, 2019, https://www.civildefence.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/publications/National-Disaster-Resilience-Strategy/National-Disaster-Resilience-Strategy-10-April-2019.pdf
15.
National Infrastructure Unit
,
2015
, “
The Thirty Year New Zealand Infrastructure Plan
,” Report, National Infrastructure Unit, Treasury, accessed Feb. 27, 2020, http://www.infrastructure.govt.nz
16.
National Infrastructure Commission
,
2018
, “New Resilience Study to Examine How Infrastructure Can Withstand Future Challenges,”
HM Treasury
,
London
, Apr. 1, 2019, https://www.nic.org.uk/
17.
Satumtira
,
G.
, and
Dueñas-Osorio
,
L.
,
2010
,
Synthesis of Modeling and Simulation Methods on Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies Research
,
Springer
,
Berlin Heidelberg
.
18.
Wang
,
S.
,
Hong
,
L.
,
Chen
,
X.
,
Zhang
,
J.
, and
Yan
,
Y.
,
2011
, “
Review of Interdependent Infrastructure Systems Vulnerability Analysis
,”
IEEE Second International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing
(
ICICIP
), Vol.
1
, Harbin, China, July 25–28, pp.
446
451
.10.1109/ICICIP.2011.6008284
19.
Zio
,
E.
,
2016
, “
Challenges in the Vulnerability and Risk Analysis of Critical Infrastructures
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
152
, pp.
137
150
.10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.009
20.
Dueñas-Osorio
,
L.
,
Craig
,
J. I.
,
Goodno
,
B. J.
, and
Bostrom
,
A.
,
2007
, “
Interdependent Response of Networked Systems
,”
J. Infrastructure Syst.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
185
194
.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:3(185)
21.
Ouyang
,
M.
,
Hong
,
L.
,
Mao
,
Z.-J.
,
Yu
,
M.-H.
, and
Qi
,
F.
,
2009
, “
A Methodological Approach to Analyze Vulnerability of Interdependent Infrastructures
,”
Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory
,
17
(
5
), pp.
817
828
.10.1016/j.simpat.2009.02.001
22.
Luiijf
,
E.
,
Nieuwenhuijs
,
A.
,
Klaver
,
M.
,
van Eeten
,
M.
, and
Cruz
,
E.
,
2009
, “
Empirical Findings on Critical Infrastructure Dependencies in europe
,”
Critical Information Infrastructure Security
,
R.
Setola
, and
S.
Geretshuber
(eds.),
Springer
,
Berlin, Heidelberg
, pp.
302
310
.
23.
van Eeten
,
M.
,
Nieuwenhuijs
,
A.
,
Luiijf
,
E.
,
Klaver
,
M.
, and
Cruz
,
E.
,
2011
, “
The State and the Threat of Cascading Failure Across Critical Infrastructures: The Implications of Empirical Evidence From Media Incident Reports
,”
Public Admin.
,
89
(
2
), pp.
381
400
.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01926.x
24.
Zimmerman
,
R.
,
2004
, “
Decision-Making and the Vulnerability of Interdependent Critical Infrastructure
,”
IEEE
International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,
Vol.
5
, The Hague, The Netherlands, Oct. 10–13, pp.
4059
4063
.10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1401166
25.
Jenelius
,
E.
, and
Mattsson
,
L.-G.
,
2012
, “
Road Network Vulnerability Analysis of Area-Covering Disruptions: A Grid-Based Approach With Case Study
,”
Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract.
,
46
, pp.
746
760
.10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.003
26.
Bompard
,
E.
,
Pons
,
E.
, and
Wu
,
D.
,
2013
, “
Analysis of the Structural Vulnerability of the Interconnected Power Grid of Continental Europe With the Integrated Power System and Unified Power System Based on Extended Topological Approach
,”
Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst.
,
23
(
5
), pp.
620
637
.10.1002/etep.1618
27.
Poljanšek
,
K.
,
Bono
,
F.
, and
Gutiérrez
,
E.
,
2012
, “
Seismic Risk Assessment of Interdependent Critical Infrastructure Systems: The Case of European Gas and Electricity Networks
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
41
, pp.
61
79
.10.1002/eqe.1118
28.
Hernandez-Fajardo
,
I.
, and
Dueñas-Osorio
,
L.
,
2013
, “
Probabilistic Study of Cascading Failures in Complex Interdependent Lifeline Systems
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
111
, pp.
260
272
.10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.012
29.
Zorn
,
C.
,, 2017, “
The Interdependence and Recovery of Critical Infrastructure Networks Following Major Disruptions
,”
Doctoral dissertation
, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.http://hdl.handle.net/2292/37055
30.
Nicholson
,
C. D.
,
Barker
,
K.
, and
Ramirez-Marquez
,
J. E.
,
2016
, “
Flow-Based Vulnerability Measures for Network Component Importance: Experimentation With Preparedness Planning
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
145
, pp.
62
73
.10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.014
31.
Patterson
,
S. A.
, and
Apostolakis
,
G. E.
,
2007
, “
Identification of Critical Locations Across Multiple Infrastructures for Terrorist Actions
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
92
, pp.
1183
1203
.10.1016/j.ress.2006.08.004
32.
Thacker
,
S.
,
Barr
,
S.
,
Pant
,
R.
,
Hall
,
J. W.
, and
Alderson
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Geographic Hotspots of Critical National Infrastructure
,”
Risk Anal.
,
37
(
12
), pp.
2490
2505
.10.1111/risa.12840
33.
Dobson
,
I.
,
Carreras
,
B. A.
,
Lynch
,
V. E.
, and
Newman
,
D. E.
,
2007
, “
Complex Systems Analysis of Series of Blackouts: Cascading Failure, Critical Points, and Self-Organization
,”
Chaos: An Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci.
,
17
(
2
), p.
026103
.10.1063/1.2737822
34.
Chmielewski, H. T., Guidotti, R., McAllister, T. P., and Gardoni, P.,
2016
, “
Response of Water Systems Under Extreme Events: A Comprehensive Approach to Modeling Water System Resilience
,”
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress
, West Palm Beach, FL, May 22–26, pp.
475
486
.https://www.nist.gov/publications/response-water-systems-under-extreme-events-comprehensive-approach-modeling-water
35.
Oughton
,
E.
,
Frias
,
Z.
,
Russell
,
T.
,
Sicker
,
D.
, and
Cleevely
,
D. D.
,
2018
, “
Towards 5 g: Scenario-Based Assessment of the Future Supply and Demand for Mobile Telecommunications Infrastructure
,”
Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change
,
133
, pp.
141
155
.10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.016
36.
Okuyama
,
Y.
, and
Santos
,
J. R.
,
2014
, “
Disaster Impact and Input Output Analysis
,”
Econ. Syst. Res.
,
26
(
1
), pp.
1
12
.10.1080/09535314.2013.871505
37.
Chen
,
Z.
, and
Rose
,
A.
,
2018
, “
Economic Resilience to Transportation Failure: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis
,”
Transportation
,
45
(
4
), pp.
1009
1027
.10.1007/s11116-017-9819-6
38.
UNISDR
,
2015
, “
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030
,” United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), accessed Feb. 27, 2020, http://www.unisdr.org/
39.
Auckland Engineering Lifelines Group
,
2014
, “
Auckland Engineering Lifelines Project: Stage 2
,” Auckland Engineering Lifelines Group, accessed Feb. 27, 2020, http://www.aelg.org.nz/
40.
Centre for Advanced Engineering,
1991
, “
Lifelines in Earthquakes: Wellington Case Study
,” Centre for Advanced Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand,
41.
Centre for Advanced Engineering,
1997
,
Christchurch Engineering Lifelines Group, Risks & Realities: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to the Vulnerability of Lifelines to Natural Hazards
,
University of Canterbury
,
Christchurch, New Zealand
, Report No. Public Act 2002 No. 33.
42.
Hawke's Bay Engineering Lifelines,
2001
, “
Facing the Risks, Report, Hawke's Bay Regional Council
,” Hawke's Bay Engineering Lifelines, accessed Feb. 27, 2020, http://www.hbemergency.govt.nz
43.
Mowll
,
R.
, and
Brunsdon
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Earthquake Impact on Utilities: Planning for Recovery
,”
Proc. ICE-Urban Des. Plann.
,
167
(
3
), pp.
106
114
.10.1680/udap.13.00010
44.
Otago Regional Council
,
2014
, “
A Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment of Otago's Lifelines Infrastructure
,” Otago Regional Council, Dunedin, New Zealand, Report.
45.
New Zealand Government
,
2002
, “
Civil Defence Emergency Management Act
,” New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand, accessed Apr. 1, 2019, http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2002/0033/51.0/DLM149789.html
46.
Wellington Engineering Lifelines Group
,
2012
, “
Lifeline Utilities Restoration Times for Metropolitan Wellington Following a Wellington Fault Earthquake
,” A Report to the Wellington CDEM Group Joint Committee, Wellington Engineering Lifelines Group, Wellington, New Zealand, Report No.
47.
Wotherspoon
,
L.
,
Palermo
,
A.
, and
Holden
,
C.
,
2017
, “
The 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake: An Introduction
,”
Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthquake Eng.
,
50
(
2
), pp.
i
iv
.10.5459/bnzsee.50.2.i-iv
48.
Statistics New Zealand
,
2013
, “
Census meshblock (Data Set)
,” Statistics New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, accessed Apr. 1, 2019, https://datafinder.stats.govt.nz/layer/8437-population-by-meshblock-2013-census/
49.
Ministry of Transport
,
2011
, “
Driver Travel: New Zealand Household Travel Survey
,” Ministry of Transport, Wellington, New Zealand, accessed Apr. 1, 2019, https://www.transport.govt.nz/mot-resources/household-travel-survey/
You do not currently have access to this content.