This paper explores an infrequently encountered hazard associated with liquid fuel tanks on gasoline-powered equipment using unvented fuel tanks. Depending on the location of fuel reserve tanks, waste heat from the engine or other vehicle systems can warm the fuel during operation. In the event that the fuel tank is not vented and if the fuel is sufficiently heated, the liquid fuel may become superheated and pose a splash hazard if the fuel cap is suddenly removed. Accident reports often describe the ejection of liquid as a geyser. This geyser is a transient, two-phase flow of flashing liquid. This could create a fire hazard and result in splashing flammable liquid onto any bystanders. Many existing fuel tank systems are vented to ambient through a vented tank cap. It has been empirically determined that the hazard can be prevented by limiting fuel tank gauge pressure to 10 kPa (1.5 psi). However, if the cap does not vent at an adequate rate, pressure in the tank can rise and the fuel can become superheated. This phenomenon is explored here to facilitate a better understanding of how the hazard is created. The nature of the hazard is explained using thermodynamic concepts. The differences in behavior between a closed system and an open system are discussed and illustrated through experimental results obtained from two sources: experiments with externally heated fuel containers and operation of a gasoline-powered riding lawn mower. The role of the vented fuel cap in preventing the geyser phenomenon is demonstrated.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2018
Research-Article
Evaluating the Potential for Gasoline Geysering From Small Engine Fuel Tanks
Juan C. Ramirez
Juan C. Ramirez
Mem. ASME
Exponent, Inc.,
4580 Weaver Parkway,
Suite 100,
Warrenville, IL 60555
e-mail: jramirez@exponent.com
Exponent, Inc.,
4580 Weaver Parkway,
Suite 100,
Warrenville, IL 60555
e-mail: jramirez@exponent.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Todd M. Hetrick
Suzanne A. Smyth
Russell A. Ogle
Juan C. Ramirez
Mem. ASME
Exponent, Inc.,
4580 Weaver Parkway,
Suite 100,
Warrenville, IL 60555
e-mail: jramirez@exponent.com
Exponent, Inc.,
4580 Weaver Parkway,
Suite 100,
Warrenville, IL 60555
e-mail: jramirez@exponent.com
1Present address: Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc., 7501 S. Quincy Street, Suite 160, Willowbrook, IL 60527.
Manuscript received March 5, 2015; final manuscript received September 1, 2017; published online October 3, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Chimba Mkandawire.
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. Jun 2018, 4(2): 021001 (4 pages)
Published Online: October 3, 2017
Article history
Received:
March 5, 2015
Revised:
September 1, 2017
Citation
Hetrick, T. M., Smyth, S. A., Ogle, R. A., and Ramirez, J. C. (October 3, 2017). "Evaluating the Potential for Gasoline Geysering From Small Engine Fuel Tanks." ASME. ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. June 2018; 4(2): 021001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037866
Download citation file:
329
Views
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Probabilistic Validation: Theoretical Foundation and Methodological Platform
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June 2023)
A Reduced-Order Wiener Path Integral Formalism for Determining the Stochastic Response of Nonlinear Systems With Fractional Derivative Elements
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (September 2023)
Robust Design Optimization of Expensive Stochastic Simulators Under Lack-of-Knowledge
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B
Sequential Ensemble Monte Carlo Sampler for On-Line Bayesian Inference of Time-Varying Parameter In Engineering Applications
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B
Related Articles
Review of Methanol and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) as Alternative for Transportation Fuels
J. Energy Resour. Technol (June,1991)
Historical Development of a Standard to Reduce Risk From Pressure Systems Failure–Part I: The ASME HPS Section 6000
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2006)
Modeling of Internal and Near-Nozzle Flow for a Gasoline Direct Injection Fuel Injector
J. Energy Resour. Technol (September,2016)
Risk Assessment Methodology for Electric-Current Induced Drowning Accidents
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (September,2016)
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Practical Resilience Metrics for Planning, Design, and Decision Making
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (September,2015)
Framework for Post-Earthquake Risk Assessment and Decision Making for Infrastructure Systems
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (March,2015)
Reliability-Based Assessment and Cost Analysis of Power Distribution Systems at Risk of Tornado Hazard
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (June,2020)
Dysfunctionality Hazard Curve: Risk-Based Tool to Support the Resilient Design of Systems Subjected to Multihazards
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (June,2021)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Combined Cycle Power Plant
Energy and Power Generation Handbook: Established and Emerging Technologies
Materials
Design and Application of the Worm Gear
A PSA Update to Reflect Procedural Changes (PSAM-0217)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)