Motivated by social and economical issues, over the last 20 years, many nuclear power plant owners started a program for the long-term operation (LTO)/plant life management (PLIM) of their older nuclear facilities. A PLIM framework requires both a detailed review of the features of the main safety programs; maintenance, surveillance, and in-service inspection (MS&I); and a complete integration of these safety programs into the general management system of the plant. Therefore, PLIM should address safety, as well as economics, knowledge management, and decision making and provide an overall framework to keep the whole plant in a safe and economically sustainable condition. Moreover, the existence of new external factors, such as extensive use of subcontractors, need for efficient management of spare parts, and request for heavy plant refurbishment programs, demands for updated techniques in the overall management of the plant. Therefore, new organizational models have to be developed to appropriately support the PLIM framework. In recent years, a network of European research organizations (SENUF) carried out many R&D tasks aimed at capturing the aspects of the maintenance programs, where research is mostly needed and at developing suitable optimized maintenance models. Using the outcome of these initiatives, this paper aims at identifying the technical attributes of the PLIM program more directly affecting the decision for a long term safe operation of a nuclear facility and the issues related to its optimal implementation. A comparison of some of the available models is presented and an analysis of the potential impact on safety and nonsafety programs is provided in order to support the development of optimized life management models.

1.
Contri
,
P.
, 2006, “
Optimisation of Maintenance Programs in View of Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants
,”
Sixth International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries With Small and Medium Electricity Grids
, ENS, Croatian Nuclear Society, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 21–25.
2.
Contri
,
P.
, 2007, “
Optimisation of Maintenance Programs as Pre-Condition for the Life Extension of Nuclear Power Plants
,”
SMiRT 19
, Toronto, Canada, Aug. 13–16.
3.
Biéth
,
M.
, 2007, “
Plant Life Management Models With Special Emphasis to the Integration of Safety With Non-Safety Related Programs
,”
PLIM
, Shanghai, China, Oct. 15–18.
4.
Contri
,
P.
, 2007, “
Needs in R&D Supporting Nuclear Power Plant Life Management
,”
PLIM
, Shanghai, China, Oct. 15–18.
5.
Contri
,
P.
, 2007, “
Maintenance Optimisation Issues in the EC
,”
ISEM 2007
, Lansing, MI.
6.
Contri
,
P.
, 2007, “
Maintenance Issues in Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants
,”
ENC 2007
, Bruxelles, Belgium.
7.
2006, “
Optimization of Maintenance Programmes at NPPs— Benchmarking Study on Implemented Organizational Schemes, Advanced Methods and Strategies for Maintenance Optimization—Summary Report
,” Report No. EUR 21903 EN.
8.
2007,
JRC-IAEA-FTU Joint Workshop on Optimisation of Maintenance, Inspection and Testing With Insights of Risk, Reliability and Performance
, Karlsruhe, Germany, Jul. 9–13.
9.
2007, “
Organisational Models and Tools for Optimised Maintenance Programs at Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs)
,”
JRC Enlargement and Integration Workshop
, Petten, The Netherlands, Dec. 6–7.
10.
2007, “
A Plant Life Management Model Including Optimized MS&I Program—Safety and Economic Issues
,” Report No. EUR 23232 EN.
11.
Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
, 2004, Equipment Reliability Process Description, INPO AP-913.
12.
International Atomic Energy Agency
, 2004,
Cost Drivers for the Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Life Extension
,
IAEA
,
Vienna
.
13.
Makela
K.
, 2007, Technical Documentation Developed for the JRC-IE, Loviisa NPP.
14.
2006, Council Decision 2006/970/EURATOM Concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) for Nuclear Research and Training Activities (2007–2011).
You do not currently have access to this content.