This paper investigates plastic collapse failure behavior and analytical assessment methods for unequal wall transition joints in transmission pipelines. The objective is to (i) validate the plastic-collapse-based code requirements that were determined by the early lower-strength pipes and (ii) develop an effective method for assessing plastic collapse failure of unequal wall joints involving modern high-strength pipes. Detailed finite element analysis was conducted to evaluate the failure behavior of transition joints and the effects of geometry, including weld taper angle, mismatched diameter and location, and material parameters, including the steel grade, mechanical property, yield-to-tensile strength (YT) ratio, and anisotropy. Numerical results show that the wall-thickness mismatch and tensile-strength mismatch are the two first-order parameters that control the plastic collapse failure behavior of unequal wall transition joints. Based on these first-order parameters, an analytic solution is formulated to predict burst pressure at plastic collapse as a function of the pipe geometry, material tensile and hardening properties for both end-opened and end-capped pipes in reference to the plastic instability and finite strain theory. A plastic collapse criterion and the corresponding plastic collapse assessment diagram (PCAD) are then developed as a function of the wall-thickness mismatch and tensile-strength mismatch conditions to ensure that plastic collapse failure would occur in the thinner wall, with higher strength pipe. General procedures to use PCAD for assessing the plastic collapse failure of unequal wall joints are outlined. Application of PCAD indicates that high-strength pipeline grades with high YT ratios can be safely used beyond current code limitations on the wall-thickness mismatch of transition joints for a wide range of strength mismatch.

1.
Anon
, 1995, “
ASME Code For Pressure Piping, B31, Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems
,” ASME B31.8 (1995 Edition), pp.
137
140
.
2.
George
,
H. H.
, and
Rodabaugh
,
E. C.
, 1959, “
Tests of Pups Support “Bridging Effect”
,” Pipe Line Industry, Oct, pp.
218
223
.
3.
Francini
,
R. B.
,
Leis
,
B. N.
, and
Miele
,
C. R.
, 2000, “
Updated Study on the Joining of Materials With Unequal Wall Thickness
,”
13th PRCI-EPRG Joint Technical Meeting on Line Pipe Research
, Paper No. 18.
4.
Leis
,
B. N.
,
Zhu
,
X. K.
, and
Galliher
,
R. D.
, 2003, “
Plastic-Collapse Criteria For Pipeline Transitions
,” the
14th PRCI-EPRG Joint Technical Meeting on Line Pipe Research
, Paper No. 16.
5.
Leis
,
B. N.
, and
Zhu
,
X. K.
, 2004, “
Unequal Wall-Thickness Pipeline Transition Joint Design Criterion Based on Plastic Collapse
,” PRCI final report.
6.
Leis
,
B. N.
, 1992, “
Ductile Fracture and Mechanical Behavior of Typical X42 and X80 Line-Pipe Steels
,” (NG-18 Report No. 204), PRCI∕AGA Catalog No. L51682.
7.
Leis
,
B. N.
, 1999, “
Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure for the G-2 Pipeline
,” Phase 1 Report, Dec., RMNE—Pemex Exploracciony Produccion.
8.
Leis
,
B. N.
, 2002, “
Hydrostatic Testing of Transmission Pipelines: When It Is Beneficial and Alternatives When It Is Not—Appendix 6
,” PRCI Final Report PR 3-9523.
9.
Dong
,
P.
, and
Hong
,
J. K.
, 2000, “
Analysis of Weld Residual Stress, Hydrotest, and Limit Load Behavior
,” Battelle internal report.
10.
Zhu
,
X. K.
, and
Leis
,
B. N.
, 2004, “
Strength Criteria and Analytic Predictions of Failure Pressure in Corroded Line Pipes
,”
Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng.
1053-5381,
14
, pp.
125
131
.
11.
Zhu
,
X. K.
, and
Leis
,
B. N.
, 2005, “
Influence of Yield-to-Tensile Strength Ratio on Failure Assessment of Corroded Pipelines
,”
J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
127
.
12.
Leis
,
B. N.
, 2002, “
Evolution of Line-Pipe Steel and its Implications for Transmission Pipeline Design
,”
Proc. of International Pipeline Conference Calgary; Sep.
,
ASME
, New York, ASME Paper No. 27015.
13.
ABAQUS Standard User’s Manual
(version 6.4),
Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen
, Pawtucket, RI, 2004.
You do not currently have access to this content.