Under the auspices of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) developed a comprehensive program to evaluate state-of-the-art methods and computer programs for seismic analysis of typical coupled nuclear power plant (NPP) systems with non-classical damping. In this program, four benchmark models of coupled building-piping/equipment systems with different damping characteristics were developed and analyzed by BNL for a suite of earthquakes. The BNL analysis was carried out by the Wilson-θ time domain integration method with the system-damping matrix computed using a synthesis formulation as presented in a companion paper [Xu, J., 2003, Nuclear Eng. Des. These benchmark problems were subsequently distributed to and analyzed by program participants applying their uniquely developed methods and computer programs. This paper presents the insights gleaned from the participants’ analyses, and the comparison of their results to the BNL time history solutions. The participant’s results established using complex modal time history methods showed close agreement with the BNL solutions, while the analyses produced with either complex-mode response spectrum methods or classical normal-mode response spectrum method, in general, produced relatively conservative results, when averaged over a suite of earthquakes. However, when coupling due to damping is significant, complex-mode response spectrum methods performed better than the classical normal-mode response spectrum method. Furthermore, as part of the program objectives, a parametric assessment is performed aiming at evaluating the applicability and sensitivity of various analysis methods to problems with different dynamic characteristics unique to coupled NPP systems. It is believed that the findings and insights learned from this program are useful in developing new acceptance criteria and providing guidance for future regulatory activities involving licensing applications of these alternate methods to coupled systems.

1.
Johnson, T. E., and McCaffery, R. J., 1969, “Current Techniques for Analyzing Structures and Equipment for Seismic Effects,” ASCE National Meeting on Water Resource, ASCE, Reston, VA.
2.
Roesset
,
J. M.
et al.
, 1973, “Modal Analysis for Structures With Foundation Interaction,” ASCE J. Struct. Div. nST3, N9603, pp. 399–916.
3.
Tsai
,
N. C.
,
1979
, “
Modal Damping for Soil-Structure Interaction
,”
J. Eng. Mech. Div.
,
EM2
, pp.
323
341
.
4.
Igusa
,
T.
, and
Der Kiureghian
,
A.
,
1985
, “
Dynamic Response of Multiply Supported Secondary Systems
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
,
III
(
1
), pp.
20
41
.
5.
Gupta, A., and Gupta, A. K., 1994, “Reduction in Seismic Response of Piping Systems Due to Coupling,” Proceedings of 5th Symposium on Current Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, Florida.
6.
Foss
,
K. A.
,
1960
, “
Coordinate Which Uncouple the Equations of Damped Linear Dynamic Systems
,”
Trans. ASME
,
82
, pp.
361
364
.
7.
Veletsos
,
A. S.
, and
Ventura
,
C. E.
,
1986
, “
Modal Analysis of Non-Classically Damped Linear Systems
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
14
(
2
), pp.
217
243
.
8.
Xu, J., 2003, “A Synthesis Formulation of Explicit Damping Matrix for Non-Classically Damped Systems,” Nucl. Eng. Des., in press.
9.
Xu, J., and DeGrassi, G., 2000, “Benchmark Program for the Evaluation of the Methods to Analyze Non-Classically Damped Coupled Systems,” Final Report, NUREG/CR-6661, The US NRC, Washington DC.
10.
Chen, C., 1974, “Seismic Resistant Design of Safety Class Structures and Equipment,” ASCE Specialty Conference on Structural Design of Nuclear Power Plant Facilities, Chicago.
11.
ASCE Standard 4, 1998, “Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures,” ASCE, Reston, VA.
12.
Gupta
,
A. K.
, and
Jaw
,
J. W.
,
1986
, “
Response Spectrum Method for Nonclassically Damped System
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
91
, pp.
161
169
.
13.
Gupta, A. K., 1992, Response Spectrum Method in Seismic Analysis and Design of Structures, CRC Press, Inc., FL.
14.
Xu, J., 1998, “Overview on Methods for Formulating Explicit Damping Matrices for Non-Classically Damped Structures,” ASME-PVP Conference Seismic Division, San Diego.
15.
Igusa
,
T.
,
Sinha
,
R.
,
Kokubo
,
E.
,
Furukawa
,
S.-I.
, and
Kawahata
,
J.-I.
,
1993
, “
Analysis of Piping With Hysteretic Supports Using Response Spectra
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
143
, pp.
187
199
.
16.
El Centro, Earthquake, S00E, 1940.
You do not currently have access to this content.