Generally, industrial piping systems are supported on hangers, snubbers, friction supports, etc. Friction supports are used for free thermal expansion of the piping systems. They also have the property to absorb energy from earthquake excitation. In this paper, equivalent linearization techniques such as the Caughey method for bilinear system and the energy method are used to calculate equivalent damping of typical industrial piping system on friction support. These methods are compared in terms of the equivalent damping. An iterative response spectrum method is tried for evaluating response of the piping system using equivalent damping obtained by linearization techniques. Maximum response displacement obtained at friction support is compared with the experimental values. At the end it is concluded that the Caughey method and the energy method evaluate similar damping for the piping on friction support and also concluded that the iterative response spectrum method is easy and reasonable for use in design.

1.
ASCE-4, 1986, ASCE Standard, “Seismic Analysis of Safety Related Nuclear Structures and Commentary on Standard of Seismic Analysis of Safety Related Structures.”
2.
Caughey
T. K.
,
1960
, “
Sinusoidal Excitation of a System With Bilinear Hysteresis
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
27
, pp.
640
643
.
3.
Chiba
T.
, and
Kobayashi
H.
,
1990
, “
Response Characteristics of Piping System Supported by Visco-Elastic and Elasto-Plastic Dampers
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
112
, pp.
34
38
.
4.
Chiba
T.
,
Kobayashi
H.
,
Yokoi
R.
,
Suzuki
K.
,
Mitsumori
T.
,
Shimizu
N.
,
Ogawa
N.
, and
Minowa
C.
,
1992
, “
An Experimental Study of Seismic Response of Piping System With the Friction: Part 2—Simplified Method Focused on the Reduction Effect of the Friction
,” Seismic Engineering Conference Proceedings,
ASME PVP
-Vol.
237-2
, pp.
243
248
.
5.
Park
Y. J.
, and
Hofmayer
C. H.
,
1995
, “
Practical Application of Equivalent Linearization Approaches to Nonlinear Piping Systems
,” Seismic Engineering Conference Proceedings,
ASME PVP
-Vol.
312
, pp.
187
200
.
6.
Reddy, G. R., 1998, “Advanced Approaches for the Seismic Analysis of Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping Systems,” Ph.D. thesis, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
7.
Suzuki
K.
,
Watanabe
T.
,
Mitsumori
T.
,
Shimizu
N.
,
Chiba
T.
,
Kobayashi
H.
,
Yokoi
R.
,
Ogawa
N.
, and
Minowa
C.
,
1992
, “
An Experimental Study of Seismic Responses of Piping Systems With the Friction: Part 1—Vibration Test by Using Large Scale Shaking Table
,” Seismic Engineering Conference Proceedings,
ASME PVP
-Vol.
237-2
, pp.
237
241
.
8.
Shimizu
N.
,
Suzuki
K.
,
Watanabe
T.
,
Ogawa
N.
, and
Kobayashi
H.
,
1996
, “
Large Scale Shaking Table Test on Modal Responses of 3-D Piping System With Friction Support
,” Seismic Engineering Conference Proceedings,
ASME PVP
-Vol.
340
, pp.
269
275
.
9.
Tansirikongkol
V.
, and
Pecknold
D. A.
,
1980
, “
Approximate Modal Analysis of Bilinear MDF Systems
,”
ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division
, Vol.
106
, No.
1-3
, pp.
361
375
.
10.
Yokoi
R.
,
Kobayashi
H.
,
Chiba
T.
,
Suzuki
K.
,
Shimizu
N.
, and
Ogawa
N.
,
1993
, “
Evaluation of the Seismic Response Reduction of Piping Systems by Support Friction
,” Seismic Engineering Conference Proceedings,
ASME PVP
-Vol.
256
.
1
, pp.
155
160
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.