Abstract

The loss of tightness of bolted flanged joints is primarily due to the relaxation of the joint; in particular, the clamping load is affected by the amount of relaxation that a gasket exhibits over time. Test methods are available for evaluating the ability of a gasket to maintain a given compressive stress. It is necessary, however, to evaluate the response of the joint members to a small change in gasket thickness produced by the effect of creep-relaxation. This paper presents an analytical evaluation of the effect of gasket creep-relaxation on the remaining gasket stress taking into account the flexibility of all joint members, thus allowing the evaluation of the required tightening load on the gasket. The results obtained by this approach are shown to agree with those determined finite on an experimental rig made up of 4-in. class-600-lb pair of flanges. Axisymmetric finite element models of larger flange assemblies are also used for comparison. The results show that creep-relaxation of gaskets has a major influence on the remaining compression load on the gasket.

1.
ABAQUS, 1988, Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorenson, Inc.
2.
American Society for Testing Material, 1993, ASTM F36, F37 and F38 Philadelphia, PA.
3.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1992, Section VIII, Division 1, Pressure Vessels, THE American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY.
1.
Bailey
R. W.
,
1937
, “
Flanged Pipe Joints for High Pressures and High Temperatures
,”
Engineering
, Vol.
144
, pp.
364
365
,
2.
Engineering
, Vol.
144
, pp.
419
421
,
3.
Engineering
, Vol.
144
, pp.
490
492
,
4.
Engineering
, Vol.
144
, pp.
538
539
,
5.
Engineering
, Vol.
144
, pp.
615
617
,
6.
Engineering
, Vol.
144
, pp.
674
676
.
1.
Bazergui, A., 1984, “Short Term Creep Relaxation Behavior of Gaskets,” Gaskets,” Welding Research Council Bulletin No. 294, New York, NY.
2.
Blach, A. E., and Bazergui, 1981, “Methods of Analysis of Bolted Flanged Connections—A Review,” Welding Research Council Bulletin No. 271, New York, NY.
3.
Bouzid
A.
, and
Chaaban
A.
,
1993
, “
Flanged Joint Analysis: A Simplified Method Based on Elastic Interaction
,”
CSME Transactions
, Vol.
17
, No.
2
, pp.
181
196
.
4.
Chaaban, A., Bouzid, A., Derenne, A., and Scheifer, W., 1993, “Evaluation of Torque Coefficients and Gasket Stress Distributions in Bolted Flanged Joint Using Different Type of Lubricants,” 3rd International Symposium on Fluid Sealing of Static Gasketed Joints, Biarritz, France, September 15–17.
5.
Fessler, H., and Swannell, J. H., 1974, “Prediction of the Creep Behaviour of a Flanged Joint,” Proceedings, Conference on Creep Behaviour of Piping, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 39–49.
6.
Gill, S. S., 1970, Stress Analysis of Pressure Vessels and Pressure Vessel Components, Chap. 6, Pergamon, New York, pp. 267–315.
7.
Harvey, J. F., 1980, Pressure Component Construction, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.
8.
Kraus, H., 1980, Creep Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
9.
Kraus, H., and Rosenkrans, W., 1984, “Creep of Bolted Flanged Connections,” Welding Research Bulletin No. 294, New York, NY.
10.
Lake
G. F.
, and
Boyd
G.
,
1957
, “
Design of Bolted Flanged Joint of Pressure Vessels
,”
Proceedings Institution of Mechanical Engineers
, Vol.
171
, p.
843
843
.
11.
Marchand, L., Derenne, M., and Bazergui, A., 1990a, “Weight Loss Correlation for Sheet Gasket Materials,” Proceedings, Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, pp. 77–84.
12.
Marchand, L., Derenne, M., and Bazergui, A., 1990b, “The Influence of Thermal Degradation on Sealing Performance of Compressed Sheet Gasket Materials with Elastomer Binder. Part I: Experimental Methods,” Proceedings, 3rd International Symposium on Fluid Sealing of Static Gasketed Joints, La Baule, France, pp. 243–254.
13.
Marchand, L., Derenne, M., and Bazergui, A., 1990c, “The Influence of Thermal Degradation on Sealing Performance of Compressed Sheet Gasket Materials with Elastomer Binder Part II: Analysis,” Proceedings, 3rd International Symposium on Fluid Sealing of Static Gasketed Joints, La Baule, France, pp. 255–266.
14.
Marchand, L., 1991, “Effet du Vieillissement a` Haute Tempe´rature sur le Comportement des Joints d’Etancheite´ de Brides Boulonne´es,” Ph.D thesis, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Quebec.
15.
Marchand
L.
,
Derenne
M.
, and
Bazergui
A.
,
1992
, “
Weight Loss Correlation for Sheet Gasket Materials
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
114
, pp.
1
7
.
16.
Marchand, L., Bazergui, A., Hahn, A., Kockelmann, H., 1993, “The Influence of the Stiffness of Flanges and Bolts on the Creep-Relaxation Behavior of Gaskets,” 3rd International Symposium on Fluid Sealing of Static Gasketed Joints, Biarritz, France, pp. 31–42.
17.
Marine
J.
,
1938
, “
Stress and Deformation in Pipe Flanges Subjected to Creep at High Temperatures
,”
Franklin Institute Journal
Vol.
226
, No.
5
, pp.
645
657
.
18.
Murray, N. W., and Stuart, D. G., 1961, “Behaviour of Large Taper Hub Flanges,” Proceedings, Symposium on Pressure Vessel Research Towards Better Design, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 133–147.
19.
Payne, J. R., Bazergui, A., and Leon, G. F., 1988, “Getting New Gasket Design Constants from Gasket Tightness Data,” Special Supplement Experimental Techniques, pp. 22–27.
20.
Roark, R. J., and Young, W. C., 1988, Formulae for Stress and Strain, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
21.
Smoley, E. M., Kessler, F. J., Kottmeyer, R. E., and Tweed, R. G., 1963, “The Creep Relaxation Properties of a Flat Face Gasketed Joint Assembly,” SAE Paper No. S 361.
22.
Taylor Forge and Pipe Works, 1979, Modern Flange Design, Chicago, IL.
23.
Timoshenko, S., 1930, Strength of Material Part II, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.
24.
Waters
E. O.
,
1938
, “
Analysis of Bolted Joints at High Temperatures
,”
TRANS. ASME
, Vol.
60
, pp.
83
86
.
25.
Waters
E. O.
,
Wesstrom
D. B.
, and
Williams
F. S. G.
,
1937
, “
Formulas for Stresses in Bolted Flanged Connections
,”
TRANS. ASME
, Vol.
59
, pp.
161
169
.
26.
Wesstrom
D. B.
, and
Bergh
S. E.
,
1951
, “
Effects of Internal Pressure on Stresses and Strains in Bolted Flanged Connections
,”
TRANS. ASME
, Vol.
73
, pp.
508
568
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.