Abstract

In the design of a fast breeder reactor (FBR) piping system, asymptotic crack size (⁠2Cs⁠) is traditionally estimated using the leak-before-break (LBB) master curve given in RCC MRx A16. The current approach is seen not to be sufficiently efficient in the LBB demonstration of FBR piping systems. Numerical crack growth studies have received much attention in the past decade. Deployment of fracture mechanics based numerical crack growth studies on prototype-sized pipe geometries generates considerable interest in estimating asymptotic crack size. This paper outlines the advantages of numerical finite element based crack growth studies to estimate the Cs on a prototype-sized pipe bend. The numerical procedure has resulted in an accurate and more realistic estimate of Cs than the traditional LBB Master curve as per A16. Considering the economic advantages of a relatively lower value of Cs for LBB demonstration, it is recommended to adopt the numerical method to estimate Cs for the FBR piping system.

Issue Section:
Design and Analysis
Topics:
Fracture (Materials), Pipe bends, Stress, Engineering prototypes

References

1.
Suresh Kumar
,
R.
,
Rao
,
B. N.
, and
Velusamy
,
K.
,
2019
, “
Relevance of Factor of Safety Based on Number of Cycles in the Prediction of Fatigue Crack Initiation as Per A16 Sigma-D Approach
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
175
, p.
103924
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.103924
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
2.
Suresh Kumar
,
R.
,
Rao
,
B.
,
Velusamy
,
K.
,
Sasikala
,
G.
, and
Jalaldeen
,
S.
,
2020
, “
Fatigue Crack Growth Material Parameters- Based on Prototype Pipe Bend Test and Comparison With Conventional Parameters
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
188
(
12
), p.
104209
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104209
3.
Chellapandi
,
P.
,
Srinivasan
,
R.
,
Biswas
,
A.
,
Chetal
,
S. C.
, and
Bhoje
,
S. B.
,
2003
, “
Leak Before Break Investigation on Sodium Piping for Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor
,”
Transactions of the 17th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology
, Prague, Czech Republic, Aug. 17–22, Paper No. SMiRT-17, pp.
G10
–
G17
.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/36/071/36071632.pdf
4.
AFCEN
,
2012
,
Guide for Prevention of Fast Fracture: Leak Before Break Analysis and Defect Assessment
,
AFCEN A16
, RCC MRx Section III, Tome 1, Subsection Z, Appendix A16, Paris, France.
5.
Newman
,
J.
, and
Raju
,
I.
,
1984
,
Stress-Intensity Factor Equations for Cracks in Three-Dimensional Finite Bodies Subjected to Tension and Bending Loads
,
NASA Langley Research Center
,
Hampton, VA,
Report No. 85793.
6.
Paris
,
P.
,
1998
, “
Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue: A Historical Perspective
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
,
21
(
5
), pp.
535
–
540
.10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00054.x
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
Moulin
,
D.
,
Chapuliot
,
S.
, and
Drubay
,
B.
,
1997
, “
Development of Crack Shape: LBB Methodology for Cracked Pipes
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Report No. NUREG/CP–0155.
8.
Kayser
,
Y.
,
Marie
,
S.
,
Poussard
,
C.
, and
Delaval
,
C.
,
2008
, “
Leak Before Break Procedure: Recent Modification of RCC-MR A16 Appendix and Proposed Improvements
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
85
(
10
), pp.
681
–
693
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.02.009
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
Suresh Kumar
,
R.
,
Jalaldeen
,
S.
,
Selvaraj
,
P.
, and
Chellapandi
,
P.
,
2011
, “
High Temperature Design of Class-1 Piping Systems in Sodium Cooled Fast Breeder Reactor
,” Transactions of SMiRT 21, New Delhi, India, Nov. 6–11, Paper ID No.
792
.10.1007/s12206-013-0718-2
10.
AFCEN
,
2012
,
Properties Groups for Materials
,
AFCEN
, RCC MRx Section III, Tome 1, Subsection Z, Appendix A3, Paris, France.
11.
AFCEN
,
2012
,
Properties Groups for Weld Joints
,
AFCEN
, RCC MRx Section III, Tome 1, Subsection Z, Appendix A9, Paris, France.
12.
Suresh Kumar
,
R.
,
Rao
,
B. N.
,
Velusamy
,
K.
, and
Jalaldeen
,
S.
,
2019
, “
Specimen Level and Component Level Simulations of Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior Under Cyclic Bending
,”
Fratt. Integr. Strut.
,
13
(
49
), pp.
526
–
535
.10.3221/IGF-ESIS.49.49
13.
Zencrack
,
2016
,
Zencrack Version 8.0.1, Background and Theory
, 8.0.1 ed.,
Zentech International Limited
, London, UK.
14.
Suresh Kumar
,
R.
,
Rao
,
B.
,
Velusamy
,
K.
, and
Sachin
,
B.
,
2021
, “
Role of Material Parameters in Fatigue Crack Growth Simulation: A Specimen Level and Prototype-Based Approach for Numerical Method
,”
Trans. Indian Natl. Acad. Eng.
, epub, pp.
1
–
7
.10.1007/s41403-021-00294-z
15.
Koers
,
R.
,
1989
, “
Use of Modified Standard 20-Node Isoparametric Brick Elements for Representing Stress/Strain Fields at a Crack Tip for Elastic and Perfectly Plastic Material
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
40
(
2
), pp.
79
–
110
.10.1007/BF00963969
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
Copyright © 2022 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.