Abstract

Inservice inspection rules for liquid-metal cooled plants were historically provided by Section XI, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. However, some parts of the Code, such as acceptance standards for the examination of class 1 and 2 components remained as being in the course of preparation. Although no major revisions were made to Division 3 since the first issue in 1980, a newly developed and published Code Case N-875 now provides alternative examinations to the methods previously contained in Division 3. The Code Case was developed using the System Based Code (SBC) concept pursuing rationalization of codes and standards based on reliability targets throughout a plant's service life. In this paper, an overview of the Code Case is presented. The technical foundation to establish the applicability of these alternative examinations as delineated in the Code Case consists of stage I and II evaluations with compensating individual considerations. Stage I is a structural integrity evaluation without the contribution of inservice inspections, while stage II is evaluation of the detectability of a postulated flaw. Not only conventional direct detection methods, but also indirect detection methods are permitted to be employed through the stage II evaluation. Furthermore, the detailed evaluation procedures are illustrated through the application of the Code Case's evaluation criteria to the primary heat transport piping system of a prototype sodium-cooled fast breeder reactor in Japan, specifically Monju.

References

1.
ASME
,
2001
, “
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, Division 3, Rules for Inspection and Testing of Components of Liquid-Metal-Cooled Plants
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. ASME BPVC. XI-2001.
2.
ASME
,
2017
, “
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Code Cases, Nuclear Components, N-875 Alternative Inservice Inspection Requirements for Liquid-Metal Reactor Passive Components
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. ASME BPVC.CC.NC-2017.
3.
Asada
,
Y.
,
Tashimo
,
M.
, and
Ueta
,
M.
,
2002
, “
System Based Code—Principal Concept
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE10-22730.10.1115/ICONE10-22730
4.
Asada
,
Y.
,
Tashimo
,
M.
, and
Ueta
,
M.
,
2002
, “
System Based Code—Basic Structure
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE10-22731.10.1115/ICONE10-22731
5.
Aoki
,
T.
,
2004
, “
An Introduction of MONJU
,” Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki, Japan, Report No. JNC TN 4520 2004-001.
6.
Takaya
,
S.
,
Asayama
,
T.
,
Kamishima
,
Y.
,
Machida
,
H.
,
Watanabe
,
D.
,
Nakai
,
S.
, and
Morishita
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Application of the System Based Code Concept to the Determination of in-Service Inspection Requirements
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
1
(
1
), p.
011004
.10.1115/1.4026392
7.
Takaya
,
S.
,
Kamishima
,
Y.
,
Machida
,
H.
,
Watanabe
,
D.
, and
Asayama
,
T.
,
2016
, “
Determination of ISI Requirements on the Basis of System Based Code Concept
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
305
, pp.
270
276
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.05.028
8.
JAEA
,
1980
, “
Application for Permission for Construction of Reactor (Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor, Monju)
,” Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki, Japan, in Japanese.
9.
JSME
,
2005
, “
Codes for Nuclear Power Generation Facilities—Rules on Design and Construction for Nuclear Power Plants—Section II Fast Reactor Standards
,” Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, Standard No. JSME S NC2-2005 (in Japanese).
10.
Yada
,
H.
,
Takaya
,
S.
,
Wakai
,
T.
,
Nakai
,
S.
, and
Machida
,
H.
,
2018
, “
Proposal on LBB Evaluation Conditions for Sodium Cooled Fast Reactor Pipes and Effects of Pipe Parameters
,”
Trans. JSME
,
84
(
859
), p.
17-00389
(in Japanese).10.1299/transjsme.17-00389
11.
Shibata
,
K.
,
Tyujyo
,
N.
,
Onizawa
,
K.
, and
Miyazono
,
S.
,
1988
, “
Progress and Evaluation of Test Results on JAERI's Ductile Pipe Fracture Test Program
,”
Fourth Japanese-German Joint Seminar on Structural Strength and NDE Programs in Nuclear Engineering
, Kanazawa, Japan, Sept. 21–22, pp.
347
364
.
12.
Koi
,
M.
,
Kagawa
,
H.
,
Komine
,
R.
, and
Wada
,
Y.
,
1990
, “
Crack Growth Properties of FBR Structural Materials at Elevated Temperatures
,” Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki, Japan, Report No. PNC TN 9410 90-105 (in Japanese).
13.
Schaaf
,
F.
,
2014
, “
Reliability and Integrity Management (RIM) –Rewrite of Section XI, Division II, Using Risk Informed Methodology
,”
ASME BNCS Workshop
, Prague, Czech Republic, July 7–8.https://www.asme.org/wwwasmeorg/media/resourcefiles/events/nuclearcodesstandards/2014pragueworkshop/schaaf-swayne.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.