Deciding the boundary conditions is the most difficult part of developing an effective finite element model. Incorrect boundary conditions can cause significant errors in analysis. The finite element analysis has become a popular method of design validation for the transformer tank but the boundary conditions to be used for simulating the pressure test by finite element analysis are not clear. The pressure test analysis is carried out by assuming the bottom surface of the transformer tank to be fixed. This common practice has not been validated and requires verification. In this work, a generalized model of the transformer tank under the pressure was solved to eliminate the assumption, and the results were compared with those of the usual practice. It was found that there was significant difference in the results of the two models indicating the incorrectness of the usual practice.

Issue Section:
Technical Brief
Topics:
Boundary-value problems, Deflection, Finite element model, Modeling, Pressure, Simulation, Stress, Design, Finite element analysis, Deformation

References

1.
ASME, 2017, “
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division I, Pressure Vessels
,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
2.
Sturgess
,
J.
,
2005
, “
Virtual Valuations [Transformer Testing]
,”
Power Eng.
,
19
(
2
), pp.
22
–
24
.
3.
Gentzlinger
,
R. C.
, and
Christensen
,
K. E.
,
1991
, “
A Guideline for Design, Analysis, and Fabrication of Vacuum Vessels for Cryogenic Accelerators
,”
Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference
, Vol.
4
, San Francisco, CA, May 6–9, pp.
2263
–
2265
.
4.
Hackl
,
A.
, and
Hamberger
,
P.
,
2012
, “
Predict the Rupture of Transformer Tanks With Static FEM Analysis
,”
XXth International Conference on Electrical Machines
, Marseille, France, Sept. 2–5, pp. 2358–2361.
5.
Yan
,
C.
,
Hao
,
Z.
,
Zhang
,
S.
,
Zhang
,
B.
, and
Zheng
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Numerical Methods for the Analysis of Power Transformer Tank Deformation and Rupture Due to Internal Arcing Faults
,”
PLoS One
,
10
(
7
), p.
e0133851
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
6.
CBIP, 2006, “
Manual on Transformer, Section—A, PP-A18
,” Central Board of Irrigation and Power, New Delhi, India, Publication No. 295.
7.
Dubey
,
P.
,
Shendge
,
A.
, and
Deshmukh
,
N. K.
,
2005
, “
Non Linear Simulation in Optimization of Transformer Tank
,”
International Conference
, pp. 55–59.
8.
Diamantoudis
,
A. T.
, and
Kermanidis
,
T.
,
2005
, “
Design by Analysis Versus Design by Formula of High Strength Steel Pressure Vessels: A Comparative Study
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
82
(
1
), pp.
43
–
50
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
KlausJürgen
,
B.
,
Eduardo
,
D.
, and
Lee
,
W. H.
,
1983
, “
Our Discrete-Kirchhoff and Isoparametric Shell Elements for Nonlinear Analysis—An Assessment
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
16
(
1–4
), pp.
89
–
98
.
10.
Cook
,
R. D.
,
Concepts and Application of Finite Element Analysis
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
11.
Paytena
,
W.
, and
Lawb
,
M.
,
1998
, “
Estimating the Plastic Collapse of Pressure Vessels Using Plasticity Contours
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
75
(
7
), pp.
529
–
536
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
Besson
,
J.
,
Cailletaud
,
G.
,
Chaboche
,
J. L.
,
Forest
,
S.
,
Blétry
,
M.
, and
Gladwell
,
G. M. L.
,
2010
, “
3D plasticity and viscoplasticity
,”
Non-Linear Mechanics of Materials
(Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, Vol.
167
).
Springer
,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands
.
13.
Timoshenko
,
S.
,
2002
,
Strength of Material Advanced Theory and Problems
,
CBS Publisher
,
New York
.
14.
Ansys, Inc., 2017, “
Ansys Help, ANSYS Version 17.2, ANSYS Theory Reference
,” Canonsburg, PA.
15.
Kim
,
N. H.
,
2015
, “
Finite Element Analysis for Contact Problems
,”
Introduction to Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis
,
Springer
,
New York
, pp.
367
–
426
.
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.