This paper addresses the problem of estimating the air gap for a large semisubmersible production platform. Although it has a great impact on the design of the floating unit, many times the minimum deck height is still defined from simplified methods that incorporate relatively large safety margins. The reason for this is the intrinsic complexity of the associated hydrodynamic problem. Nonlinear effects on the incoming and scattered waves are usually relevant and sometimes nonlinear effects on the motions of the floating hull may also play an important role. This discussion is illustrated by means of wave basin tests performed with the model of a large semisubmersible designed to operate in Campos Basin. Significant run-up effects on its squared-section columns were observed for the steepest waves in several design conditions. Also, the unit presented relatively large low-frequency motions in heave, roll and pitch, which also affected the dynamic air gap measurements. In order to evaluate the difficulties involved in modeling such phenomena, simplified tests were also performed with the model fixed and moored in regular waves of varying steepness. Wave elevation in different points was measured in these tests and compared to the predictions obtained from two different numerical methods: a BEM code that incorporates second order diffraction effects (WAMIT) and a VOF CFD code (ComFLOW), the latter employed for fixed model tests only. Results show that a standard linear analysis may lead to significant errors concerning the air gap evaluation. Extending the BEM model to second order clearly improve the results as the wave-steepness increases. Although the VOF analysis is considerably time-consuming, simulations presented very good agreement to the experimental results, even for the steepest waves tested.

References

1.
Stansberg
,
C. T.
,
Baarholm
,
R.
,
Kristiansen
,
T.
,
Hansen
,
E. W. M.
, and
Rortveit
,
G.
,
2005
, “
Extreme Wave Amplification and Impact Loads on Offshore Structures
,”
Offshore Technology Conference
,
Houston
,
May 2–5
.
2.
Danmeier
,
D. G.
,
Seah
,
R. K. M.
,
Finnigan
,
T.
,
Roddier
,
D.
,
Aubault
,
A.
,
Vache
,
M.
, and
Imamura
,
J. T.
,
2008
, “
Validation of Wave Run-Up Calculation Methods for a Gravity Based Structure
,” Proceedings of the
ASME
27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2008),
Estoril, Portugal
,
June 15–20
. 10.1115/OMAE2008-57625
3.
WAMIT
,
2004
, “
WAMIT User Manual 6.2, 6.2PC, 6.2S, 6.2S-PC
,” WAMIT Inc., MA.
4.
Simos
,
A. N.
,
Fujarra
,
A. L. C.
,
Sparano
,
J. V.
,
Umeda
,
C. H.
, and
Rossi
,
R. R.
,
2006
, “
Experimental Evaluation of the Dynamic Air Gap of a Large-Volume Semi-Submersible Platform
,”
Proceeding of the 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering
(
OMAE2006
),
Hamburg, Germany
,
June 4–9
. 10.1115/OMAE2006-92352
5.
Comflow V2.3
,
2008
, “Manual Comflow V2.3.”
6.
Hirt
,
C. W.
, and
Nichols
,
B. D.
,
1981
, “
Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boudaries
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
39
, pp.
201
225
.10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
7.
Pinkster
,
J. A.
,
1980
, “
Low Frequency Second Order Wave Exciting Forces on Floating Structures
,” Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
8.
Simos
,
A. N.
,
Sparano
,
J. V.
,
Aranha
,
J. A. P.
, and
Matos
,
V. L. F.
,
2008
, “
2nd Order Hydrodynamic Effects on Resonant Heave, Pitch and Roll Motions of a Large-Volume Semi-Submersible Platform
,”
Proceeding of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering
(
OMAE2008
),
Estoril, Portugal
,
June 15–20
. 10.1115/OMAE2008-57430
9.
Iwanowski
,
B.
,
Lefranc
,
M.
, and
Wemmenhove
,
R.
,
2009
, “
CFD Simulation of Wave Run-Up on a Semi-Submersible and Comparison With Experiment
,” Proceedings of the
ASME
28th International Conference on Offshore and Artic Engineering (OMAE2009)
,
Honolulu, HI
,
May 31–June 5
. 10.1115/OMAE2009-79052
10.
Kleefsman
,
K. M. T.
,
Loots
,
G. E.
,
Veldman
,
A. E. P.
,
Buchner
,
B.
,
Bunnik
,
T.
, and
Falkenberg
,
E.
,
2005
, “
The Numerical Simulation of Green Water Loading Including Motions and Incoming Wave Field
,”
Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering
(
OMAE2005
),
Halkidiki, Greece
,
June 12–17
. 10.1115/OMAE2005-67448
11.
Bunnik
,
T.
, and
Veldman
,
A.
,
2010
, “
Modelling the Effect of Sloshing on Ship Motions
,”
Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering
(
OMAE2010
),
Shanghai, China
,
June 6–11
. 10.1115/OMAE2010-20458
12.
Buchner
,
B.
,
Bunnik
,
T. H. J.
,
Fekken
,
G.
, and
Veldman
,
A. E. P.
,
2001
, “
A Numerical Study on Wave Run Up on an FPSO Bow
,”
Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering (OMAE2001)
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
June 3–8
.
13.
Loots
,
E.
, and
Buchner
,
B.
,
2004
, “
Wave Run Up as Important Hydrodynamic Issue for Gravity Based Structures
,”
Proceedings of the 23th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering
(
OMAE2004
),
Vancouver, Canada
,
June 20–25
. 10.1115/OMAE2004-51084
14.
Wellens
,
P. R.
,
Pinkster
,
J. A.
,
Veldman
,
A. E. P.
, and
Huijsmans
,
R. H. M.
,
2007
, “
Numerical Wave Run Up Calculation on GBS Columns
,”
Proceedings of the 17th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
(
ISOPE2007
),
Lisbon, Portugal
,
July 1–6
.
You do not currently have access to this content.