Abstract

Numerical ventilation (NV) is a well-known problem that occurs when the volume of fluid method is used to model vessels with a bow that creates an acute entrance angle with the free surface, as is typical for both planing hulls and yachts. Numerical ventilation may be considered one of the main sources of error in numerical simulations of planning hulls and as such warrants an in-depth analysis. This paper sets out to bring together the available work, as well as performing its own investigation into the problem to develop a better understanding of numerical ventilation and present alternate solutions. Additionally, the success and impact of different approaches are presented in an attempt to help other researchers avoid and correct for numerical ventilation. Interface smearing caused by the simulation being unable to track the free surface is identified as the main source of numerical ventilation. This originates from the interface between the volume mesh and the prism layer mesh. This study investigates this interface, presenting a novel solution to prism layer meshing that was found to minimize numerical ventilation. Through the implementation of a modified high-resolution interface capture (HRIC) scheme and the correct mesh refinements, it is possible to minimize the impact of numerical ventilation to a level that will not affect the results of a simulation and is acceptable for engineering applications.

References

1.
Larson
,
L.
,
Stern
,
F.
, and
Visonneau
,
M.
,
2014
,
Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics—An Assessment of the Gothenburg 2010 Workshop
,
Springer Netherlands
,
The Netherlands
.
2.
ITTC Specialist Committee on CFD in Marine Hydrodynamics
,
2014
, “
Specialist Committee on CFD in Marine Hydrodynamics Final Report and Recommendations to the 27th ITTC
,” https://ittc.info/media/6097/sc-cfd.pdf, Accessed December 11, 2018
3.
Brizzolara
,
S.
, and
Serra
,
F.
,
2007
, “
Accuracy of CFD Codes in the Prediction of Planning Surfaces Hydrodynamic Characteristics
,”
Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Marine Research and Transportation
,
Ischia, Naples, Italy
,
June 28–30
, pp.
147
158
.
4.
Veysi
,
S. T. G.
,
Bakhtiari
,
M.
,
Ghassemi
,
H.
, and
Ghiasi
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Toward Numerical Modeling of the Stepped and Non-stepped Planing Hull
,”
J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng.
,
37
(
6
), pp.
1635
1645
. 10.1007/s40430-014-0266-4
5.
Mancini
,
S.
,
De Luca
,
F.
, and
Ramolini
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Towards CFD Guidelines for Planning Hull Simulations Based on the Naples Systematic Series
,”
Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, MARINE 2017
,
Nantes, France
,
May 15–17
, pp.
1071
1085
.
6.
De Marco
,
A.
,
Mancini
,
S.
,
Miranda
,
S.
,
Scognamiglio
,
R.
, and
Vitiello
,
L.
,
2017
, “
Experimental and Numerical Hydrodynamic Analysis of a Stepped Planning Hull
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
64
, pp.
135
154
. 10.1016/j.apor.2017.02.004
7.
Frisk
,
D.
, and
Tegehall
,
L.
,
2015
, “
Prediction of High-Speed Planning Hull Resistance and Running Attitude – A Numerical Study Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
,” Masters Thesis, Report. X –
Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University ofTechnology
,
Gothenburg, Sweden
.
8.
De Luca
,
F.
,
Mancini
,
S.
,
Miranda
,
S.
, and
Pensa
,
C.
,
2016
, “
An Extended Verification and Validation Study of CFD Simulations for Planning Hulls
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
60
(
2
), pp.
101
118
. 10.5957/jsr.2016.60.2.101
9.
Sottorf
,
W.
, “
Experiments With Planning Surfaces
,”
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Technical Memorandums 661, March, Mar. 1934
, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930094677, Accessed January 3, 2019.
10.
Viola
,
I. M.
,
Flay
,
R. G. J.
, and
Ponzini
,
R.
,
2012
, “
CFD Analysis of the Hydrodynamic Performance of Two Candidate America’s Cup AC33 Hulls
,”
Int. J. Small Craft Technol.
,
154
(
1
), pp.
1
12
. 10.3940/rina.ijsct.2012.b1.113
11.
Böhm
,
C.
,
2011
, “
A Velocity Prediction Procedure for Sailing Yachts With a Hydrodynamic Model Based on Integrated Fully Coupled Ranse-Free-Surface Simulations
,”
Delft University of Technology
,
Delft, The Netherlands
.
12.
Olin
,
L.
,
2015
, “
Numerical Modeling of Spray Sheet Deflection on Planning Hulls
,”
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
,
Stockholm
.
13.
Ubbink
,
O.
,
1997
, “
Numerical Prediction of Two Fluid Systems With Sharp Interfaces
,”
University of London and Diploma of Imperial College
,
London, UK
.
14.
Muzaferija
,
S.
, and
Peric
,
M.
,
1999
, “Computation of Free Surface Flows Using Interface-Tracking and Interface Capturing Methods,”
Nonlinear Water Wave Interaction
,
WIT Press
,
Southampton
.
15.
CD Adapco
,
2018
, “
Simcenter STAR-CCM+ Documentation
,” https://documentation.thesteveportal.plm.automation.siemens.com/starccmplus_latest_en/index.html#page/connect%2Fsplash.html, Accessed January 7, 2019
16.
Andrillon
,
Y.
, and
Alessandrini
,
B.
,
2003
, “A 2D + T VOF Fully Coupled Formulation for Calculation of Breaking Free Surface Flow,”
Twenty-Fourth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
,
National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC.
17.
Taunton
,
D. J.
,
Hudson
,
D. A.
, and
Shenoi
,
R. A.
,
2010
, “
Characteristics of a Series of High Speed Hard Chine Planing Hulls—Part 1: Performance in Calm Water
,”
Int. J. Small Craft Technol.
,
152
, pp.
55
75
. 10.3940/rina.ijsct.2011.b1.97
18.
Ferziger
,
J. H.
, and
Perić
,
M.
,
2002
,
Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics
, 3rd ed.,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
19.
ITTC—Recommended Procedures and Guidelines
,
2011
, “
Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD
,” https://ittc.info/media/1357/75-03-02-03.pdf, Accessed January 3, 2019.
20.
Brizzolara
,
S.
, and
Villa
,
D.
,
2010
, “
CFD Simulation of Planning Hulls
,”
Proceedings of Seventh International Conference On High-Performance Marine Vehicles
,
Melbourne, FL
,
Oct. 13–15
, pp.
16
24
.
21.
Lotfi
,
P.
,
Ashrafizaadeh
,
M.
, and
Esfahan
,
R. K.
,
2015
, “
Numerical Investigation of a Stepped Planning Hull in Calm Water
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
94
, pp.
103
110
. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.11.022
22.
Bakhtiari
,
M.
,
Veysi
,
S.
, and
Ghassemi
,
H.
,
2016
, “
Numerical Modeling of the Stepped Planning Hull in Calm Water
,”
Int. J. Eng.
,
29
(
2
), pp.
236
245
. 10.5829/idosi.ije.2016.29.02b.13
23.
Sukas
,
O. F.
,
Kinaci
,
O. K.
,
Cakici
,
F.
, and
Gokce
,
M. K.
,
2017
, “
Hydrodynamic Assessment of Planning Hulls Using Overset Grids
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
65
, pp.
35
46
. 10.1016/j.apor.2017.03.015
24.
Dashtimanesh
,
A.
,
Esfandiari
,
A.
, and
Mancini
,
S.
,
2017
, “
Performance Prediction of Two-Stepped Planning Hulls Using Morphing Mesh Approach
,”
J. Ship Prod. Des.
,
34
, pp.
236
248
. 10.5957/JSPD.160046
25.
Ghassemi
,
H.
,
Kamarlouei
,
M.
, and
Veysi
,
S. T. G.
,
2015
, “
A Hydrodynamic Methodology and CFD Analysis for Performance Prediction of Stepped Planning Hulls
,”
Pol. Marit. Res.
,
22
(
2
), pp.
23
31
. 10.1515/pomr-2015-0014
26.
Wang
,
S.
,
Su
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
X.
, and
Yang
,
J.
,
2012
, “
RANSE Simulation of High-Speed Planning Craft in Regular Waves
,”
J. Mar. Sci. Appl.
,
11
(
4
), pp.
447
452
. 10.1007/s11804-012-1154-x
27.
Castiglione
,
T.
,
Stern
,
F.
,
Bova
,
S.
, and
Kandasamy
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Seakeeping Behavior of a Catamaran Advancing in Regular Head Waves
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
38
(
16
), pp.
1806
1822
. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.09.003
28.
26th ITTC Specialist Committee on CFD in Marine Hydrodynamics
,
2014
, “
Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications
,” http://ittc.info/media/1357/75-03-02-03.pdf, Accessed May 1, 2018.
29.
Tezdogan
,
T.
,
Demirel
,
Y. K.
,
Kellett
,
P.
,
Khorasanchi
,
M.
,
Incecik
,
A.
, and
Turan
,
O.
,
2015
, “
Full-Scale Unsteady RANS CFD Simulations of Ship Behaviour and Performance in Head Seas Due to Slow Steaming
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
97
, pp.
186
206
. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.011
30.
Begovic
,
E.
,
Bertorello
,
C.
, and
Mancini
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Hydrodynamic Performances of Small Size Swath Craft
,”
Brodogradnja/Shipbuilding
,
66
(
4
), pp.
1
22
.
31.
Sukas
,
ÖF
, and
Gökçe
,
M. K.
,
2016
, “
Prediction of Hydrodynamic Aspects of a Catamaran Using Overset Grid Design
,”
Proceedings of Thirteenth International Conference on Marine Sciences and Technologies Black Sea
.
32.
Resistance Committee of 25th ITTC
,
2008
, “
Uncertainty Analysis in CFD Verification and Validation Methodology and Procedures
,” http://ittc.info/media/4184/75-03-01-01.pdf
33.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
,
1998
,
Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations
,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
,
Washington, DC
.
34.
Stern
,
F.
,
Wilson
,
R.
, and
Shao
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Quantitative V&V of CFD Simulations and Certification of CFD Codes
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
50
(
11
), pp.
1335
1355
. 10.1002/fld.1090
35.
Xing
,
T.
, and
Stern
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Factors of Safety for Richardson Extrapolation
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
132
(
6
), p.
061403
. 10.1115/1.4001771
You do not currently have access to this content.