Abstract

Floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) are susceptible to instability which has come to be called negative damping. Conventional land-based wind turbine controllers when used with FOWTs may cause large-amplitude platform pitch oscillations. Most controllers have since been improved to reduce motions due to this phenomenon. In this paper, the motions induced using one of the original controllers are studied. The current study is performed using the coupled time-domain program FAST-SIMDYN that was developed in Marine Dynamics Laboratory (MDL) at Texas A&M University. It can study large-amplitude motions of floating offshore wind turbines. FOWTs use various controller algorithms of operation based on the available wind speed depending on various power output objectives i.e., to either maximize or level out power absorption. It is observed that the transition region for controllers is often chaotic. So, most studies focus on operations away from the transition region below and above the transition wind speeds. Here, we study the transition region using the theoretical insight of nonlinear motion response of structures. This study reveals the presence of a very interesting and potentially hazardous nonlinear phenomenon, bifurcation. This finding could help explain the chaotic motion response that is observed in the transition region of controllers. Understanding the nature and cause of bifurcation could prove very useful for the future design of FOWT controllers.

References

1.
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
Hanson
,
T. D.
, and
Skaare
,
B.
,
2006
, “
Integrated Dynamic Analysis Of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
,
Hamburg, Germany
,
June 4–9
, vol.
47462
, pp.
671
679
.
2.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
, and
Buhl
,
M. L.
, Jr
,
2007
, “Loads Analysis of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Using Fully Coupled Simulation,” NREL Report No. NREL/CP-500-41714.
3.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
2007
, “Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine,” NREL Report No. NREL/TP-500-41958.
4.
Bir
,
G.
, and
Jonkman
,
J.
,
2007
, “
Aeroelastic Instabilities of Large Offshore and Onshore Wind Turbines
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
75
(
1
), p.
012069
.
5.
Larsen
,
T. J.
, and
Hanson
,
T. D.
,
2007
, “
A Method to Avoid Negative Damped Low Frequent Tower Vibrations for a Floating, Pitch Controlled Wind Turbine
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
75
(
1
), p.
012073
.
6.
Karimirad
,
M.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Ameliorating the Negative Damping in the Dynamic Responses of a Downwind Tension Leg Spar Type Offshore Wind Turbine
,”
European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC2011)
,
Brussels, Belgium
,
Mar. 14
, pp. 1–10, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Madjid_Karimirad/publication/277274960_Ameliorating_the_Negative_Damping_in_the_Dynamic_Responses_of_a_Tension_Leg_Spar-Type_Support_Structure_with_a_Downwind_Turbine/links/5776c34f08ae1b18a7e1b113.pdf.
7.
Lackner
,
M. A.
,
2009
, “
Controlling Platform Motions and Reducing Blade Loads for Floating Wind Turbines
,”
Wind Eng.
,
33
(
6
), pp.
541
554
.
8.
Namik
,
H.
, and
Stol
,
K. A.
,
2009a
, “
Control Methods for Reducing Platform Pitching Motion of Floating Wind Turbines
,”
European Offshore Wind
,
Stockholm, Sweden
,
Sept. 14–16
, pp. 1–10, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Karl_Stol/publication/267721902_Control_Methods_for_Reducing_Platform_Pitching_Motion_of_Floating_Wind_Turbines/links/54876cfc0cf289302e2edb45.pdf
9.
Namik
,
H.
, and
Stol
,
K. A.
,
2009b
, “
Disturbance Accommodating Control of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
,
Orlando, FL
,
Jan. 5–8
, pp.
1
15
. .
10.
Chaaban
,
R.
, and
Fritzen
,
C. P.
,
2014
, “
Reducing Blade Fatigue and Damping Platform Motions of Floating Wind Turbines Using Model Predictive Control
,”
9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014
,
Porto, Portugal
,
June 30–July 2
, pp.
3581
3588
.
11.
Goupee
,
A. J.
,
Kimball
,
R. W.
, and
Dagher
,
H. J.
,
2017
, “
Experimental Observations of Active Blade Pitch and Generator Control Influence on Floating Wind Turbine Response
,”
Renewable Energy
,
104
, pp.
9
19
.
12.
Souza
,
C. E. S.
, and
Bachynski
,
E. E.
,
2019
, “
Changes in Surge and Pitch Decay Periods of Floating Wind Turbines for Varying Wind Speed
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
180
, pp.
223
237
.
13.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
Butterfield
,
S.
,
Musial
,
W.
, and
Scott
,
G.
,
2009
, “Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development” NREL Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060.
14.
Thomson
,
W. T.
, and
Dahleh
,
M. D.
,
1998
,
Theory of Vibrations with Applications
, 5th ed.,
Prentice-Hall Inc
,
London, UK
.
15.
Holmes
,
P. J.
, and
Rand
,
D. A.
,
1976
, “
The Bifurcations of Duffing’s Equation: An Application of Catastrophe Theory
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
44
(
2
), pp.
237
253
.
16.
Jose
,
A.
,
Falzarano
,
J. M.
, and
Wang
,
H.
,
2020
, “
Development of Coupled Program Fast-Simdyn and Study of Non-Linear Hydrodynamics, Coupled With Negative Damping and Aerodynamics of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct.
,
142
(
2
), p.
021904
.
17.
Jose
,
A.
,
Falzarano
,
J.
, and
Wang
,
H.
,
2018
, “
A Study of Negative Damping In Floating Wind Turbines Using Coupled Program FAST-SIMDYN
,”
Proceedings of the 1st International Offshore Wind Technical Conference
,
San Francisco, CA
,
Nov. 4–7, 2018
, ASME Paper No. IOWTC2018-1112.
18.
Falzarano
,
J. M.
,
Esparza
,
I.
, and
Taz Ul Mulk
,
M. A.
,
1995
, “
A Combined Steady-State and Transient Approach to Study Large-Amplitude Ship Rolling Motion and Capsizing
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
39
(
3
), pp.
213
224
.
You do not currently have access to this content.