A method is presented that enables the analysis of weather window assessments for the installation and retrieval phases of a self-elevating unit (SEU). The method takes site-specific parameters, defined as soil type and water depth, into account in addition to vessel-specific and environmental parameters. The inclusion of site-specific parameters is the novel contribution compared to assessment methodologies used today. A simulation model is presented that incorporates a coupled nonlinear time-domain analysis of vessel motion and soil–structure interaction. Soil deformation behavior during impact is described by resistance curves based on a bearing capacity theory. A structural evaluation criterion against which impact forces are compared is used for weather window assessments. The simulation model is applied on a case study utilizing different soil types to study impact forces and the capacity of the structure for withstanding such impacts and eventually performing a weather window assessment. The results show that the jacking operation can be divided into two phases when it comes to loads on the spudcan: a phase dominated by vertical forces followed by a phase dominated by horizontal forces. It is found that including soil deformation behavior is of paramount importance to the magnitude of the resulting impact forces and that class-recommended practice does indeed produce rather large force estimates. Thus, assessments where site-specific parameters are incorporated could definitely increase the operable weather window for SEUs, and, consequently, increase the economic competitiveness of, for example, the offshore wind industry.

References

1.
European Commission
,
2008
, “
Offshore Wind Energy: Action Needed to Deliver on the Energy Policy Objectives for 2020 and Beyond
,” EC, Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, Belgium.
2.
Det Norske Veritas
,
2013
, “
Wind Turbine Installation Units
,” DNV, Høvik, Norway, Report No. DNV-OS-J301.
3.
Det Norske Veritas
,
2012
, “
Self-Elevating Units
,” DNV, Høvik, Norway, Report No. DNV-RP-C104.
4.
International Organization for Standardization
,
2012
, “
Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries—Site-Specific Assessment of Mobile Offshore Units, Part 1: Jack-Ups
,” ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, Report No. ISO/DIS 19905-1.
5.
The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers
,
2008
, “
Recommended Practice for Site Specific Assessment of Jack-Up Units
,” SNAME, Houston, TX.
6.
Daun
,
V.
, and
Olsson
,
F.
,
2014
, “
Impact Loads on a Self-Elevating Unit During Jacking Operation—A Methodology Incorporating Site-Specific Parameters for Weather Window Assessment
,” M.Sc. thesis, Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
7.
AeroHydro
,
2011
, “
AeroHydro MultiSurf 8.0 Version 8.0
,” AeroHydro, Southwest Harbor, MA.
8.
WAMIT
,
2013
, “
WAMIT User Manual Version 7.0
,” WAMIT, Chestnut Hill, MA.
9.
Marine Technology Research Institute
,
2013
, “
SIMO—User's Manual Version 4.0
,” Norwegian MARINTEK, Trondheim, Norway.
10.
Marine Technology Research Institute
,
2013
, “
SIMO—Theory Manual Version 4.0
,” Norwegian MARINTEK, Trondheim, Norway.
11.
Autodesk
,
2013
, “
Autodesk Autocad 2014
,” Autodesk, San Rafael, CA.
12.
Dassault Systèmes
,
2013
, “
ABAQUS 6.13 Documentation
,” Dassault Systèmes, Providence, RI.
13.
Danziger
,
F. A. B.
, and
Lunne
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Rate Effect on Cone Penetration in Sand
,”
Geotech. Eng.
,
43
(
4
), pp.
72
81
.
14.
Chakrabarti
,
P.
,
2012
, “
Going on Location Study for a Jack-Up Rig
,”
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2012-83034.
15.
Drydocks World
,
2010
, “
NG-9000C-HPE—Multi-Purpose Self-Propelled Jack-Up
,” Drydocks World—Southeast Asia Pte. Limited, Singapore.
16.
Det Norske Veritas
,
2004
, “
Buckling Strength Analysis of Bars and Frames, and Spherical Shells
,” DNV, Høvik, Norway, Classification Notes No. 30.1.
17.
Williams
,
M. S.
,
Thompson
,
R. S. G.
, and
Houlsby
,
G. T.
,
1997
, “
Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis of Offshore Jack-Up Unit
,” University of Oxford, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford, UK.
18.
Mohammed
,
E. A.
,
Benson
,
S. D.
,
Hirdaris
,
S. E.
, and
Dow
,
R. S.
,
2016
, “
Design Safety Margin of a 10,000 TEU Container Ship Through Ultimate Hull Girder Load Combination Analysis
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
46
(
1
), pp.
78
101
.
You do not currently have access to this content.