In structural redesign (inverse design), selection of the number and type of performance constraints is a major challenge. This issue is directly related to the computational effort and, most importantly, to the success of the optimization solver in finding a solution. These issues are the focus of this paper, which provides and discusses techniques that can help designers formulate a well-posed integrated complex redesign problem. LargE Admissible Perturbations (LEAP) is a general methodology, which solves redesign problems of complex structures with, among others, free vibration, static deformation, and forced response amplitude constraints. The existing algorithm, referred to as the Incremental Method is improved in this paper for problems with static and forced response amplitude constraints. This new algorithm, referred to as the Direct Method, offers comparable level of accuracy for less computational time and provides robustness in solving large-scale redesign problems in the presence of damping, nonstructural mass, and fluid-structure interaction effects. Common redesign problems include several natural frequency constraints and forced response amplitude constraints at various frequencies of excitation. Several locations on the structure and degrees of freedom can be constrained simultaneously. The designer must exercise judgment and physical intuition to limit the number of constraints and consequently the computational time. Strategies and guidelines are discussed. Such techniques are presented and applied to a 2,694 degree of freedom offshore tower.

1.
Bernitsas, M. M., ed., 1994, RESTRUCT: Theoretical Manual, Report to The University of Michigan/Sea Grant/Industry Consortium in Offshore Engineering, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
2.
Hoff, C. J., and Bernitsas, M. M., 1986, “Static Redesign of Offshore Structures,” Proc. 5th International OMAE Symposium, III, pp. 78–85, Tokyo, Japan.
3.
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
, and
Suryatama
,
D.
,
1999
, “
Structural Redesign by Large Admissible Perturbations With Static Mode Compensation
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
121
(
1
), pp.
39
46
.
4.
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
, and
Blouin
,
V. Y.
,
1999
, “
Structural Redesign for Forced Response Amplitude With Proportional Damping by Large Admissible Perturbations
,”
AIAA J.
,
37
(
11
), pp.
1506
1513
.
5.
Blouin
,
V. Y.
, and
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
,
2001
, “
Redesign of Submerged Structures by Large Admissible Perturbations
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
123
(
3
), pp.
103
111
.
6.
Kang, B., and Bernitsas, M. M., 1994, “Stress Redesign by Large Admissible Perturbations,” Proc. BOSS ’94 Conference, Cambridge, MA, 3, pp. 201–212.
7.
Beyko
,
E.
, and
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
,
1993
, “
Reliability of Complex Structures by Large Admissible Perturbations
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
115
(
3
), pp.
167
178
.
8.
Tawekal
,
R. L.
, and
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
,
1991
, “
Finite Element Model Correlation for Offshore Structures
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
114
(
3
), pp.
154
164
.
9.
Suryatama
,
D.
, and
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
,
2000
, “
Topology and Performance Redesign of Complex Structures by Large Admissible Perturbations
,”
Structural Optimization Research J.
,
20
(
2
), pp.
138
153
.
10.
Tits, A. L., and Zhou, J. L., 1993, User’s Guide for FSQP Version 3.3b: A FORTRAN Code for Solving Constrained Nonlinear (Minimax) Optimization Problems. Generating Iterates Satisfying All Inequality and Linear Constraints, Electrical Engineering Department and Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
11.
Bernitsas
,
M. M.
, and
Rim
,
C. W.
,
1994
, “
Redesign of Plates by Large Admissible Perturbations
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
5
), pp.
1021
1028
.
12.
Sandstro¨m
,
R. E.
, and
Anderson
,
W. J.
,
1982
, “
Modal Perturbation Methods for Marine Structures
,”
Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng., Trans.
,
90
, pp.
41
54
.
13.
Lamb
,
T.
,
1969
, “
A Ship Design Procedure
,”
Marine Technology
,
pp.
362
404
.
14.
Restad
,
K.
,
Volcy
,
G. C.
,
Garnier
,
H.
, and
Masson
,
J. C.
,
1973
, “
Investigation on Free and Forced Vibrations of an LNG Tanker With Overlapping Propeller Arrangement
,”
Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng., Trans.
,
81
, pp.
307
347
.
15.
Johannessen
,
H.
, and
Skaar
,
K. T.
,
1980
, “
Guidelines for Prevention of Excessive Ship Vibration
,”
Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng., Trans.
,
88
, pp.
319
356
.
16.
DeBord
,
F.
, Jr.
,
Hennessy
,
W.
, and
McDonald
,
J.
,
1998
, “
Measurement and Analysis of Shipboard Vibrations
,”
Marine Technology
,
35
(
1
), pp.
1
9
.
17.
Appa Rao
,
T. V.
,
Iyer
,
N. R.
,
Rajasankar
,
J.
, and
Palani
,
G. S.
,
2000
, “
Dynamic Response Analysis of Ship Hull Structures
,”
Marine Technology
,
37
(
3
), pp.
117
128
.
You do not currently have access to this content.