Abstract

The nuclear power industry is increasingly identifying applications of machine learning to reduce design, engineering, manufacturing, and operational costs. In some cases, applications have been deployed and are providing value, particularly in data rich manufacturing areas. In this paper, we use machine learning to develop metamodel approximations of a computationally intense safety analysis code used to simulate a postulated loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA). Accurate metamodels run at a fraction of the computational cost (milliseconds) compared to the LOCA analysis code. Metamodels can therefore support applications requiring a high volume of runs such as optimization, uncertainty analysis, and probabilistic decision analysis, which would otherwise not be possible using the computationally intense code. In this study, training data is first generated by running the safety analysis code over a design of experiment. Exploratory data analysis is then performed followed by an initial fitting of several model forms, including neighbor-based models, tree-based models, support vector machines, and artificial neural networks. A neural network is selected as the most promising candidate and hyperparameter optimization using a genetic algorithm is performed. Finally, the resulting model, its potential applications, and areas for further research are discussed.

References

1.
Liao
,
J.
,
Worrell
,
C. L.
, and
Spring
,
J. P.
,
2019
, “
Data-Driven Safety Margin Management Using Reduced Order Modeling
,”
Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc.
,
121
(
1
), pp.
975
978
.
2.
Worrell
,
C.
,
Luangkesorn
,
L.
,
Haight
,
J.
, and
Congedo
,
T.
,
2019
, “
Machine Learning of Fire Hazard Model Simulations for Use in Probabilistic Safety Assessments at Nuclear Power Plants
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
183
, pp.
128
142
.10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.014
3.
Worrell
,
C. L.
,
Schneider
,
R.
,
Leyde
,
B.
, and
Xu
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Emulation-Based Uncertainty Quantification of a Fire Dynamics Simulation
,”
Proceedings of ANS International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2017)
,
Pittsburgh, PA
, Sept. 24–28, pp.
24
28
.
4.
Banyay
,
G. A.
,
Worrell
,
C. L.
,
Sidener
,
S. E.
, and
Kaizer
,
J. S.
,
2021
, “
Credibility Assessment of Machine Learning in a Manufacturing Process Application
,”
ASME J. Verif., Validation Uncertainty Quantif.
,
6
(
3
), p.
031007
.10.1115/1.4051717
5.
Frepoli
,
C.
,
Ohkawa
,
K.
, and
Nissley
,
M. E.
,
2009
, “
Development of WCOBRA/TRAC-TF2 Computer Code: Coupling of the 3D Module (COBRA-TF) With the 1D Module of TRAC-PF1/MOD2
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE17-76044.10.1115/ICONE17-76044
6.
Dong
,
D.
, and
McAvoy
,
T. J.
,
1996
, “
Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis—Based on Principal Curves and Neural Networks
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
,
20
(
1
), pp.
65
78
.10.1016/0098-1354(95)00003-K
7.
Rowe
,
R. C.
, and
Colbourn
,
E. A.
,
2003
, “
Neural Computing in Product Formulation
,”
Chem. Educator
,
8
(
1
), pp.
1
8
.
8.
Wlodzislaw
,
D.
, and
Jankowski
,
N.
,
2001
, “
Transfer Functions: Hidden Possibilities for Better Neural Networks
,”
Proceedings of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks
,
Belgium
, Apr. 25–27, pp.
81
94
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221166037_Transfer_functions_hidden_possibilities_for_better_neural_networks
9.
Liao
,
J.
,
Mace
,
A.
,
Wang
,
G.
, and
Fisher
,
J. S.
,
2022
, “
Apply Machine Learning to Improve BOA Analysis of CIPS/CILC
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE29-94480.10.1115/ICONE29-94480
You do not currently have access to this content.