This article deals with the exploitation of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the recognition of metallic delivery capsules. The targeted application is a closed-loop position control of magnetic objects implemented using the components of a clinical MRI scanner. Actuation can be performed by switching the magnetic gradient fields, whereas object locations are detected by an analysis of the MRI scans. A comprehensive investigation of susceptibility artifacts with a total number of 108 experimental setups has been performed in order to study scaling laws and the impact of object properties and imaging parameters. In addition to solid metal objects, a suspension of superparamagnetic nanoparticles has been examined. All 3D scans have been segmented automatically for artifact quantification and location determination. Analysis showed a characteristic shape for all three base types of sequences, which is invariant to the magnetic object shape and material. Imaging parameters such as echo time and flip angle have a moderate impact on the artifact volume but do not modify the characteristic artifact shape. The nanoparticle agglomerates produce imaging artifacts similar to the solid samples. Based on the results, a two-stage recognition/tracking procedure is proposed.

1.
Mathieu
,
J. -B.
, and
Martel
,
S.
, 2007, “
Magnetic Microparticle Steering Within the Constraints of an MRI System: Proof of Concept of a Novel Targeting Approach
,”
Biomed. Microdevices
1387-2176,
9
(
6
), pp.
801
808
.
2.
Dahmen
,
C.
,
Wortmann
,
T.
, and
Fatikow
,
S.
, 2010, “
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Magnetic Particles for Targeted Drug Delivery
,”
ASME 2010 First Global Congress on NanoEngineering for Medicine and Biology (NEMB2010)
.
3.
Felfoul
,
O.
,
Mathieu
,
J. -B.
,
Beaudoin
,
G.
, and
Martel
,
S.
, 2008, “
MR-Tracking Based on Magnetic Signature Selective Excitation
,”
IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
0278-0062,
27
(
1
), pp.
28
35
.
4.
De Guio
,
F.
,
Benoit-Cattin
,
H.
, and
Davenel
,
A.
, 2007, “
Quantitative Study of Signal Decay Due to Magnetic Susceptibility Interfaces: MRI Simulations and Experiments
,”
29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS)
.
5.
Shafiei
,
F.
,
Honda
,
E.
,
Takahashi
,
H.
, and
Sasaki
,
T.
, 2003, “
Artifacts From Dental Casting Alloys in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
,”
J. Dent. Res.
0022-0345,
82
(
8
), pp.
602
606
.
6.
Ernstberger
,
T.
,
Buchhorn
,
G.
, and
Heidrich
,
G.
, 2009, “
Artifacts in Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging Due to Different Intervertebral Test Spacers: An In Vitro Evaluation of Magnesium Versus Titanium and Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymers as Biomaterials
,”
Neuroradiology
0028-3940,
51
(
8
), pp.
525
529
.
7.
Lee
,
M. -J.
,
Kim
,
S.
,
Lee
,
S. -A.
,
Song
,
H. -T.
,
Huh
,
Y. -M.
,
Kim
,
D. -H.
,
Han
,
S. H.
, and
Suh
,
J. -S.
, 2007, “
Overcoming Artifacts From Metallic Orthopedic Implants at High-Field-Strength MR Imaging and Multi-Detector CT
,”
Radiographics
0271-5333,
27
, pp.
791
803
.
8.
Matsuura
,
H.
,
Inoue
,
T.
,
Konno
,
H.
,
Sasaki
,
M.
,
Ogasawara
,
K.
, and
Ogawa
,
A.
, 2002, “
Quantification of Susceptibility Artifacts Produced on High-Field Magnetic Resonance Images by Various Biomaterials Used for Neurosurgical Implants: Technical Note
,”
J. Neurosurg.
0022-3085,
97
(
6
), pp.
1472
1475
.
9.
Port
,
J.
, and
Pomper
,
M.
, 2000, “
Quantification and Minimization of Magnetic Susceptibility Artifacts on GRE Images
,”
Neuroradiology
0028-3940,
24
, pp.
958
964
.
10.
DiMaio
,
S.
,
Kacher
,
D.
,
Ellis
,
R.
,
Fichtinger
,
G.
,
Hata
,
N.
,
Zientara
,
G.
,
Panych
,
L.
,
Kikinis
,
R.
, and
Jolesz
,
F.
, 2006, “
Needle Artifact Localization in 3T MR Images
,”
Stud. Health Technol. Inform.
0926-9630,
119
, pp.
120
125
.
11.
Forsyth
,
D. A.
, and
Ponce
,
J.
, 2002,
Computer Vision: A Modern Approach
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
You do not currently have access to this content.