A size and shape optimization routine is developed for a 1.0mm diameter multifunctional instrument for minimally invasive surgery. The instrument is a compliant mechanism capable of both grasping and cutting. Multifunctional instruments are expected to be beneficial in the operating room because of their ability to perform multiple surgical tasks, thereby decreasing the total number of instrument exchanges in a single procedure. With fewer instrument exchanges, the risk of inadvertent tissue trauma as well as overall surgical time and costs are reduced. The focus of this paper is to investigate the performance effects of allowing the cross-sectional area along the length of the device to vary. This investigation is accomplished by defining various cross-sectional segments in terms of parametric variables and optimizing the dimensions of the instrument to provide a sufficient opening of the forceps jaws while maintaining adequate cutting and grasping forces. Two optimization problems are considered. First, all parametric segments are set equal to one another to achieve size optimization. Second, each segment is allowed to vary independently, thereby achieving shape optimization. Large deformation finite element analysis and optimization are conducted using ANSYS®. Finally, prototypes are fabricated using wire EMD and experiments are conducted to evaluate the instrument performance. As a result of allowing the cross-sectional area to vary, i.e., conducting shape optimization, the forceps and scissors blocked forces increased by as much as 83.2% and 87%, respectively. During prototype evaluations, it is found that the finite element analysis predictions were within 10% of the measured tool performance. Therefore, for this application, it is concluded that performing shape optimization does significantly influence the performance of the instrument.

1.
Vecchio
,
R.
,
MacFayden
,
B. V.
, and
Palazzo
,
F.
, 2000, “
History of Laparscopic Surgery
,”
Panminerva Med.
0031-0808,
42
, pp.
87
90
.
2.
Lim
,
J. J. B.
, and
Erdman
,
A. B.
, 2003, “
A Review of Mechanisms Used in Laparoscopic Surgical Instruments
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
38
, pp.
1133
1147
.
3.
Surgeons
,
N. E. M. I.
, 2007, “
Dramatic Advantages of Laparoscopic Surgery
,” http://www.smallscars.com/pages/mis_is.htmlhttp://www.smallscars.com/pages/mis_is.html
4.
Reardon
,
P. R.
,
Kamelgard
,
J. I.
,
Applebaum
,
B.
,
Lucho Rossman
,
B.
, and
Brunicardi
,
F. C.
, 1999, “
Feasibility of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Miniaturized Instrumentation in 50 Consecutive Cases
,”
World J. Surg.
0364-2313,
23
, pp.
128
132
.
5.
Melzer
,
A.
, 1996, “
Endoscopic Instruments-Conventional and Intelligent
,”
Endosurgery
,
Churchill Livingstone
,
New York
, pp.
69
95
.
6.
Frecker
,
M.
,
Powell
,
K.
, and
Haluck
,
R.
, 2005, “
Design of a Multifunctional Compliant Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
127
, pp.
990
993
.
7.
Mayol
,
J.
,
Garcia-Aguilar
,
J.
, and
Ortiz-Oshiro
,
E.
, 1997, “
Risks of the Minimal Access Approach for Laparoscopic Surgery: Multivariate Analysis of Mobidity Related to Umbilical Trocar Insertion
,”
World J. Surg.
0364-2313,
21
, pp.
529
533
.
8.
Mehta
,
N.
,
Haluck
,
R.
,
Frecker
,
M.
, and
Snyder
,
A.
, 2002, “
Sequence and Task Analysis of Instrument Use in Common Laparoscopic Procedures
,”
Surg. Endosc
0930-2794,
16
(
2
), pp.
280
285
.
9.
Wafapoor
,
H.
, and
Peyman
,
G. A.
, 1996, “
A New Instrument (Forceps/Scissors) for Preretinal Membrane Peeling, Segmentation
,”
Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago)
0003-9950,
114
(
1
), p.
99
.
10.
Lyons
,
T. L.
, and
Winer
,
W. K.
, 2005, “
An Innovative Bipolar Instrument for Laparoscopic Surgery
,”
J. Soc. Laparoendosc Surg.
1086-8089,
9
, pp.
39
41
.
11.
Auge
,
B. K.
,
Lallas
,
C. D.
,
Preminger
,
G. M.
, and
Polascik
,
T. J.
, 2003, “
Use of Bipolar Laparoscopic Forceps to Occlude and Transect the Retroperitoneal
,”
J. Endourol
0892-7790,
17
(
3
), pp.
181
185
.
12.
Dutch Ophthalmic Research Corporation, Eckardt Illuminated Microforceps, May 2006, http://www.dorc.nl/catalogus/microforcepscissor.htmlhttp://www.dorc.nl/catalogus/microforcepscissor.html
13.
Fisher
,
Y. L.
,
Gross
,
N. E.
, and
Wang
,
C.
, 2003, “
Inexpensive Illuminated Vitrectomy Cutter
,”
Retina
0275-004X,
23
(
6
), p.
891
.
14.
Aguirre
,
M.
, and
Frecker
,
M.
, 2006, “
Design of a 1.0mm Multifunctional Forceps-Scissors Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 30th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference
,
Philadelphia, PA
, DETC2006-99446.
15.
Culkar
,
K.
, 2004, “
Design and Optimization of Minimally Invasive Multifunctional Surgical Instruments
,”
BS Honors
, Mechanical Engineering, Penn State University.
16.
Ansys
,
I.
, “
ANSYS Advanced Analysis Techniques Guide
,” Jan. 2007.
17.
Ansys
,
I.
, “
ANSYS Theory Reference
,” Jan. 2007.
You do not currently have access to this content.