The quality function deployment (QFD) conceptual design tool has been of significant benefit to customer satisfaction, while reducing the associated design time and cost. Observation of novice designers in tertiary engineering design courses identified a range of impediments to the robust transfer of QFD capabilities to the novice designers. These impediments appear to limit the perceived merit of QFD in novice designers and stymie its subsequent practical application. Given the improved design outcomes associated with QFD, a series of enhancements has been developed to overcome these impediments and assist the robust transfer of QFD capabilities to novice designers. The traditional QFD tool does not engage with customer requirements that constrain the feasibility of a design solution. This limitation restricts the applicability of QFD as an overarching design reference because an additional repository is required to document design constraints and may result in confusion in novice designers and flawed design outcomes if design constraints are used. A novel differential assessment method has been developed to overcome this limitation by enabling the inclusion of design constraints. The outcomes of this paper contribute to design education by facilitating the robust transfer of QFD capabilities and providing novel enhancements that expand the useful outcomes associated with QFD.

1.
Hauser
,
J. R.
, and
Clausing
,
D.
, 1988, “
The House of Quality
,”
Harvard Bus. Rev.
0017-8012,
66
, No.
3
, May-June, pp.
63
73
.
2.
Voland
,
G.
, 2004,
Engineering by Design
,
Prentice Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
3.
Ullman
,
D. G.
, 2003,
The Mechanical Design Process
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
4.
Otto
,
K.
, and
Wood
,
K.
, 2001,
Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
5.
Dieter
,
G.
, 2000,
Engineering Design, a Materials and Processing Approach
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
6.
Bauer
,
H.
, ed., 2000,
Automotive Handbook
,
Robert Bosch GmbH
,
Stuttgart
.
7.
Fox
,
J.
, 1993,
Quality Through Design
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
8.
Hoyle
,
D.
, 1998,
ISO Quality Systems Handbook
,
Butterworth Hienemann
,
Washington, DC
.
9.
Leary
,
M.
,
Burvill
,
C.
, and
Weir
,
J.
, 2005, “
Proposed Quality Function Deployment Enhancements
,”
International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED ’05), Melbourne
, pp.
441
442
.
10.
Chan
,
L.-K.
, and
Wu
,
M.-L.
, 2002, “
Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
143
(
10
), pp.
463
497
.
11.
Ashby
,
M.
, 2000,
Material Selection in Mechanical Design
,
Butterworth Heinemann
,
Landon
, Vol.
2
.
12.
Ashby
,
M.
, (2000). “
Multi-Objective Optimization in Material Design and Selection
,”
Acta Mater.
1359-6454,
48
(
1
), pp.
359
371
.
13.
Pahl
,
G.
,
Beitz
,
W.
, 1995,
Engineering Design: A Systems Approach
,
Springer
,
New York
.
14.
Cross
,
N.
, 1989,
Engineering Design Methods
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
15.
Haik
,
Y.
, 2003,
Engineering Design Processes
,
Brooks-Cole
,
Belmont, MA
.
16.
Leary
,
M.
, 2006, “
Mass Reduction of Fatigue-Limited, Safety-Critical (FLSC), Ferrous Metal Automotive Components by Forged Light Alloy Substitution
,” Melbourne University, Melbourne.
17.
Ashby
,
M.
, and
Jones
,
D.
, 1993,
Engineering Materials 1
,
Pergamon Press
,
London
.
18.
Ashby
,
M.
, and
Jones
,
D.
, 1993,
Engineering Materials 2
,
Pergamon Press
,
London
.
19.
Dowling
,
N. E.
, 1993,
Mechanical Behaviour of Metals
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
20.
Batelle
, 1998,
Military Handbook Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures
,
Batelle
,
Philadelphia, PA
.
21.
Chen
,
J. L.
, and
Liu
,
C.-C.
, 2003, “
An Eco-Innovative Design Method by Green QFD and TRIZ Tools
,”
International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED '03), Stockholm
, The Design Society, pp.
405
406
.
22.
Danner
,
S.
, and
Reske
,
M.
, 1999, “
Systematic Design in Practice: Target Finding for Products and Processes
,”
International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED “99), Munich
, Techniche Universität München, pp.
233
236
.
23.
Hauser
,
J. R.
, 1992, “
Puritan-Bennett: The Renaissance Spirometry System: Listening to the Voice of the Customer
,” Massachusetts, The International Centre for Research on the Management of Technology, MIT, Report WP No. 67-92.
24.
Prasad
,
B.
, 1998, “
Review of QFD and Related Deployment Techniques
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
1087-1357,
17
(
3
), pp.
221
234
.
You do not currently have access to this content.