The description of a beam element by only the displacement of its centerline leads to some difficulties in the representation of the torsion and shear effects. For instance such a representation does not capture the rotation of the beam as a rigid body about its own axis. This problem was circumvented in the literature by using a local coordinate system in the incremental finite element method or by using the multibody floating frame of reference formulation. The use of such a local element coordinate system leads to a highly nonlinear expression for the inertia forces as the result of the large element rotation. In this investigation, an absolute nodal coordinate formulation is presented for the large rotation and deformation analysis of three dimensional beam elements. This formulation leads to a constant mass matrix, and as a result, the vectors of the centrifugal and Coriolis forces are identically equal to zero. The formulation presented in this paper takes into account the effect of rotary inertia, torsion and shear, and ensures continuity of the slopes as well as the rotation of the beam cross section at the nodal points. Using the proposed formulation curved beams can be systematically modeled.

1.
Burke, W. L., 1985, Applied Differential Geometry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2.
Greenberg, M. D., 1988, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
3.
Escalona
,
J. L.
,
Hussien
,
A. H.
, and
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1998
, “
Application of the Absolute Nodal Co-ordinate Formulation to Multibody System Dynamics
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
,
214
, No.
5
, pp.
833
851
.
4.
Shabana, A. A., 1996, “An Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for the Large Rotation and Deformation Analysis of Flexible Bodies,” Technical Report MBS96-1-UIC, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
5.
Shabana, A. A., 1998, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
Hussien
,
H. A.
, and
Escalona
,
J. L.
,
1998
, “
Application of the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation to Large Rotation and Large Deformation Problems
,”
ASME Journal of Mechanical Design
,
120
, pp.
188
195
.
7.
Takahashi, Y. and Shimizu, N., 1999, “Study on Elastic Forces of the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for Deformable Beams,” presented at the Second Symposium on Multibody Dynamics and Vibration, ASME Conferences, Las Vegas, Paper # DETC99/VIB-8203.
8.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1998
, “
Computer Implementation of the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for Flexible Multibody Dynamics
,”
Nonlinear Dynamics
,
16
, pp.
293
306
.
9.
Yakoub
,
R. Y.
, and
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1999
, “
Use of Cholesky Coordinates and the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation in the Computer Simulation of Flexible Multibody Systems
,”
Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics
,
20
, pp.
267
282
.
10.
Argyris
,
J. H.
,
Balmer
,
H.
,
Doltsinis
,
J. St.
,
Dunne
,
P. C.
,
Haase
,
M.
,
Kleiber
,
M.
,
Malejannakis
,
G. A.
,
Mlejnek
,
H.-P.
,
Mu¨ller
,
M.
, and
Scharpf
,
D. W.
,
1979
, “
Finite Element Method-The Natural Approach
,”
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
,
17/18
, pp.
1
106
.
11.
Rankin
,
C. C.
, and
Brogan
,
F. A.
,
1986
, “
An Element Independent Corotational Procedure for the Treatment of Large Rotations
,”
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
,
108
, pp.
165
174
.
12.
Ashley
,
H.
,
1967
, “
Observation of the Dynamic Behavior of Flexible Bodies in Orbit
,”
Journal of AIAA
,
5
, No.
3
, pp.
460
469
.
13.
Canavin
,
J. R.
, and
Likins
,
P. W.
,
1977
, “
Floating Reference Frames for Flexible Spacecraft
,”
Journal of Spacecraft
,
14
, No.
12
, pp.
724
732
.
14.
De Veubeke
,
B. J.
,
1976
, “
The Dynamics of Flexible Bodies
,”
International Journal of Engineering Sciences
,
14
, pp.
895
913
.
15.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1997
, “
Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Review of Past and Recent Developments
,”
Multibody System Dynamics
,
1
, pp.
189
222
.
16.
Bauchau
,
O. A.
, and
Kang
,
N. K.
,
1993
, “
A Multibody Formulation for Helicopter Structural Dynamic Analysis
,”
Journal of the American Helicopter Society
,
38
, pp.
3
14
.
17.
Simo
,
J. C.
,
1985
, “
A Finite Strain Beam Formulation. The Three Dimensional Dynamics Problem. Part I
,”
Journal of Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
,
49
, pp.
55
70
.
18.
Simo
,
J. C.
, and
Vu-Quoc
,
L.
,
1986
, “
On the Dynamics of Flexible Beams Under Large Overall Motion-the Plane Case: Part I
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
53
,
849
854
.
19.
Berzeri, M., and Shabana A. A., 1999, “A Continuum Mechanics Approach for Formulating the Elastic Forces in the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation,” Technical Report MBS99-3-UIC, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
20.
Przemieniecki, J. S., 1985, Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis, 2nd edition, Dover.
21.
Dym, C. L., and Shames, I. H., 1973, Solid Mechanics, A Variational Approach, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
22.
Cowper
,
G. R.
,
1966
, “
The Shear Coefficient in Timoshenko Beam Theory
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
,
33
, pp.
335
340
.
23.
Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., and Plesha, M. E., 1989, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons.
24.
Kane
,
T. R.
, and
Levinson
,
D. A.
,
1981
, “
Simulation of Large Motions of Nonuniform Beams in Orbit: Part II-The Unstraited Beam
,”
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences
,
29
, No.
3
, pp.
213
244
.
25.
Mikkola, A. M., and Shabana, A. A., 2001, “A New Plate Element Based on the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Fomulation,” Proceedings of the ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Pittsburgh, PA, September 2001.
You do not currently have access to this content.