The issue of environmental sustainability, which is unprecedented in both magnitude and complexity, presents one of the biggest challenges faced by modern society. Design engineers can make significant contributions by incorporating environmental awareness into product and process development. It is critical that engineers make a paradigm shift in product design from centering on cost and performance to balancing economic, environmental, and societal considerations. Although there have been quite a few designs for environment (or ecodesign) tools developed, so far, these tools have only achieved limited industrial penetration. The present-day methods are either too qualitative to offer concrete solutions and not effective for designers with limited experience or too quantitative, costly, and time consuming. Thus, current ecodesign tools cannot be implemented during the early design phases. This paper develops a novel, semiquantitative ecodesign methodology that is targeted specifically toward the early stages of the design process. The new methodology is a combination of environmental life cycle assessment and visual tools such as quality function deployment, functional-component matrix, and Pugh chart. Since the early design process is function-oriented, a new visual tool called the function impact matrix has been developed to correlate environmental impacts with product function. Redesign of office staplers for reduced carbon footprint has been selected as a case study to demonstrate the use of the proposed approach. Life cycle assessment results confirm that the new stapler design generated using this methodology promotes improved environmental performance.

1.
National Academy of Engineering
, 2008, Grand Challenges for Engineering.
2.
Chertow
,
M. R.
, 2001, “
The IPAT Equation and Its Variants: Changing Views of Technology and Environmental Impact
,”
J. Ind. Ecol.
1088-1980,
4
(
1
), pp.
13
29
.
3.
Harper
,
S. R.
, and
Thurston
,
D. L.
, 2008, “
Incorporating Environmental Impacts in Strategic Redesign of an Engineered System
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
130
(
3
), p.
031101
.
4.
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
, 2009, “
Who Cares for Planet Earth?
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
131
(
2
), p.
020201
.
5.
Mihelcic
,
J. R.
,
Paterson
,
K. G.
,
Phillips
,
L. D.
,
Zhang
,
Q.
,
Watkins
,
D. W.
,
Barkdoll
,
B. D.
,
Fuchs
,
V. J.
,
Fry
,
L. M.
, and
Hokanson
,
D. R.
, 2008, “
Educating Engineers in the Sustainable Futures Model With a Global Perspective
,”
Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst.
1028-6628,
25
, pp.
255
263
.
6.
Pappas
,
E. C.
, and
Kander
,
R. G.
, 2008, “
Sustainable Engineering Design at James Madison University
,”
Proceedings—Frontiers in Education Conference, 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
, Saratoga Springs, NY.
7.
Choi
,
J. K.
,
Nies
,
L.
, and
Ramani
,
K.
, 2008, “
A Framework for the Integration of Environmental and Business Aspects Toward Sustainable Product Development
,”
J. Eng. Design
0954-4828,
19
(
5
), pp.
431
446
.
8.
Curran
,
M. A.
, 2006, “
Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice
,” Paper No. EPA/600/R-06/060, Washington DC.
9.
Pugh
,
S.
, 1991, “
Conceptual Design
,”
Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering
,
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
, pp.
67
100
.
10.
Prasad
,
B.
, 1998, “
Review of QFD and Related Deployment Techniques
,”
J. Manuf. Syst.
0278-6125,
17
(
3
), pp.
221
234
.
11.
Iqbal
,
L.
,
Crossley
,
W.
,
Weisshaar
,
T.
, and
Sullivan
,
J.
, 2008, “
Higher Level Design Methods Applied to the Conceptual Design of an MALE UAV
,”
Twelfth AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference
, Victoria, BC, Paper No. AIAA-2008-5908.
12.
UNEP
, 2005, “
Life Cycle Approaches: The Road From Analysis to Practice
,” A UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative Report, http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx0594xPA-Road.pdfhttp://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx0594xPA-Road.pdf.
13.
Fargnoli
,
M.
, and
Kimura
,
F.
, 2006, “
Sustainable Design of Modern Industrial Products
,”
Proceedings of 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering
, Leuven, Belgium, pp.
189
194
.
14.
Lee
,
K. M.
, and
Park
,
P. J.
, 2005,
EcoDesign: Best Practice of ISO-14062, Eco-Product Research Institute (ERI)
,
Ajou University
,
Korea
.
15.
Sakao
,
T.
, 2007, “
A QFD-Centred Design Methodology for Environmentally Conscious Product Design
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
45
(
18–19
), pp.
4143
4162
.
16.
Boks
,
C.
, 2006, “
The Soft Side of Ecodesign
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
0959-6526,
14
(
15–16
), pp.
1346
1356
.
17.
Cooper
,
J. S.
, and
Fava
,
J. A.
, 2006, “
Life-Cycle Assessment Practitioner Survey: Summary of Results
,”
J. Ind. Ecol.
1088-1980,
10
(
4
), pp.
12
14
.
18.
Lofthouse
,
V.
, 2006, “
Ecodesign Tools for Designer: Defining the Requirements
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
0959-6526,
14
(
15–16
), pp.
1386
1395
.
19.
Goldschmidt
,
G.
, 1994, “
On Visual Design Thinking: The Vis Kids of Architecture
,”
Des. Stud.
0142-694X,
15
(
2
), pp.
158
174
.
20.
ISO-TR 14062, 2002, Environmental Management—Integrating Environmental Aspects Into Product Design and Development.
21.
ISO 14040, 2006, Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework.
22.
ISO 14044, 2006, Environmental Management–Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines.
23.
Todd
,
J. A.
,
Curran
,
M. A.
, 1999, “
Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment: A Final Report From the SETAC North America Streamlined LCA Workgroup SETAC
.”
24.
Koffler
,
C.
,
Krinke
,
S.
,
Schebek
,
L.
, and
Buchgeister
,
J.
, 2008, “
Volkswagen SlimLCI: A Procedure for Streamlined Inventory Modeling Within Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicles
,”
Int. J. Veh. Des.
0143-3369,
46
(
2
), pp.
172
188
.
25.
Luttropp
,
C.
, and
Lagerstedt
,
J.
, 2006, “
Ecodesign and the Ten Golden Rules: Generic Advice for Merging Environmental Aspects Into Product Development
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
0959-6526,
14
(
15–16
), pp.
1396
1408
.
26.
Masui
,
K.
,
Sakao
,
T.
,
Kobayashi
,
M.
, and
Inaba
,
A.
, 2003, “
Applying Quality Function Deployment to Environmentally Conscious Design
,”
Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage.
0265-671X,
20
(
1
), pp.
90
106
.
27.
Otto
,
K. N.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
, 2001,
Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development
,
Prentice Hall
,
NY
.
28.
Linton
,
J. D.
, 2002, “
DEA: A Method for Ranking the Greeness of Design Decisions
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
124
(
2
), pp.
145
150
.
29.
Gero
,
J. S.
, 1990, “
Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design
,”
AI Mag.
0738-4602,
11
(
4
), pp.
26
36
.
30.
ACCOD Brands Company
, http://www.acco.com/swingline/http://www.acco.com/swingline/, accessed May, 2009.
31.
Product Ecology Consultant
, http://www.pre.nl/simapro/http://www.pre.nl/simapro/, accessed May, 2009.
32.
Econinvent Center
, http://www.ecoinvent.ch/http://www.ecoinvent.ch/, accessed May, 2009.
You do not currently have access to this content.