In traditional linkage design practice, a designer first decides the specific linkage type, such as a four- or six-bar linkage, and then varies the joint locations and link lengths until the designer finds the desired linkage. The objective of this research is to establish an automatic mechanism synthesis method that determines the linkage type and dimensions during the synthesis process. The synthesis process can be formulated as a minimization problem. However, the process can be extremely difficult and time-consuming unless there is a single unified linkage model that represents any linkage mechanism without complicating kinematic analysis and allows the use of an efficient gradient-based optimizer. The main contribution of this investigation is to propose a unified planar linkage model consisting of rigid blocks connected by zero-length springs having real-valued variable stiffness. Stiffness controlling variables are the design variable of the minimization problem and a general planar linkage can be simulated by the spring-connected rigid block model if the stiffness value is chosen appropriately. Though mechanisms involving only revolute joints are investigated and the solved problems are relatively simple, the notion of the block model and the synthesis formulation in real variables are expected to give a different perspective on mechanism synthesis.

1.
Tao
,
D. C.
, 1964,
Applied Linkage Synthesis
,
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
, London.
2.
Erdman
,
G.
, and
Sandor
,
G. N.
, 1991,
Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis
, 2nd ed.,
Prentice-Hall Inc.
, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Vol.
I
.
3.
Fox
,
R. L.
, and
Gupta
,
K. C.
, 1973, “
Optimization Technology as Applied to Mechanism
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
95
, pp.
657
663
.
4.
Roots
,
R. R.
, and
Ragesdell
,
K. M.
, 1976, “
A Survey of Optimization Methods Applied to the Design of Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
98
(
3
), pp.
1036
1041
.
5.
Cabrera
,
J. A.
,
Simon
,
A.
, and
Prado
,
M.
, 2002, “
Optimal Mechanisms With Genetic Algorithms
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
37
, pp.
1165
1177
.
6.
Shiakolas
,
P. S.
,
Koladiya
,
D.
, and
Kebrle
,
J.
, 2002, “
On the Optimum Synthesis of Four-Bar Linkages Using Differential Evolution and the Geometic Centroid of Precision Positions
,”
Inverse Probl. Eng.
1068-2767,
10
(
6
), pp.
485
502
.
7.
Shiakolas
,
P. S.
,
Koladiya
,
D.
, and
Kebrle
,
J.
, 2005, “
On the Optimum Synthesis of Six-Bar Linkages Using Differential Evolution and the Geometric Centroid of Precision Positions Technique
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
40
, pp.
319
335
.
8.
Chiou
,
S. J.
, and
Kota
,
S.
, 1999, “
Automated Conceptual Design of Mechanisms
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
34
, pp.
467
495
.
9.
Lipson
,
H.
, and
Pollack
,
J. B.
, 2000, “
Automatic Design and Manufacture of Robotic Lifeforms
,”
Nature (London)
0028-0836,
406
, pp.
974
978
.
10.
Pollack
,
J. B.
, and
Lipson
,
H.
, 2000, “
The GOLEM Project: Evolving Hardware Bodies and Brains
,”
Proceeding of the Second NASA/DoD Workshop on Evolvable Hardware
, pp.
37
42
, Palo Alto, CA, July 13–15.
11.
Fernández-Bustos
,
I.
,
Aguirrebeitia
,
J.
,
Avilés
,
R.
, and
Angulo
,
C.
, 2005, “
Kinematical Synthesis of 1-DOF Mechanisms Using Finite Elements and Genetic Algorithms
,”
Finite Elem. Anal. Design
0168-874X,
41
, pp.
1441
1463
.
12.
Sedlaczek
,
K.
,
Gaugele
,
T.
, and
Eberhard
,
P.
, 2005, “
Topology Optimized Synthesis of Planar Kinematic Rigid Body Mechanisms
,”
Multibody Dynamics, ECCOMAS Thematic Conference
, Madrid, Spain, June 21–24.
13.
Bruns
,
T. E.
, 1990, “
Design of Planar, Kinematic, Rigid Body Mechanisms
,” master’s thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
14.
Hansen
,
J. H.
, 1995, “
Synthesis of Spatial Mechanisms Using Optimization and Continuation Methods
,” In
Computational Dynamics of Multibody Systems
M. S.
Peireira
, ed.
Kluwer
, Dordrecht, pp.
183
196
.
15.
Kawamoto
,
A.
,
Bendsøe
,
M. P.
, and
Sigmund
,
O.
, 2004, “
Articulated Mechanism Design With a Degree of Freedom Constraint
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
0029-5981,
61
, pp.
1520
1545
.
16.
Kim
,
Y. Y.
,
Jang
,
G. W.
, and
Nam
,
S. J.
, 2006, “
Inverse Kinematics of Binary Manipulators by Using the Continuous-Variable-Based Optimization Method
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
22
(
1
), pp.
33
42
.
17.
ADAMS/View Manual
, version 12.0, 2002,
MSC Software.
18.
Nikravesh
,
P. E.
, 1988,
Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical System
,
Prentice-Hall
, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
19.
Kim
,
Y. Y.
, and
Yoon
,
G. H.
, 2000, “
Multi-resolution Multi-scale Topology Optimization—A New Paradigm
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
0020-7683,
37
, pp.
5529
5559
.
20.
Yoon
,
G. H.
, and
Kim
,
Y. Y.
, 2003, “
The Role of S-Shaped Mapping Functions in the SIMP Approach for Topology Optimization
,”
KSME Int. J.
1226-4865,
15
, pp.
1496
1506
.
21.
Vanderplaats
,
G. N.
, 1984,
Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design with Application
,
McGraw-Hill
, New York.
You do not currently have access to this content.