Optimal workpiece orientation for multi-axis sculptured part surface machining is generally defined as orientation of the workpiece so as to minimize the number of setups in 4-, 5- or more axis Numerical Control (NC) machining, or to allow the maximal number of surfaces to be machined in a single setup on a three-, four-, or five-axis NC machine. This paper presents a method for computing such an optimal workpiece orientation based on the geometry of the part surface to be machined, of the machining surface of the tool, and of the degrees of freedom available on the multi-axis NC machine. However, for cases in which some freedom of orientation remains after conditions for machining in a single setup are satisfied, a second sort of optimality can also be considered: finding an orientation such that the cutting condition (relative orientation of the tool axis and the normal to the desired part surface) remains as constant, at some optimal angle, as possible. This second form of optimality is obtained by choosing an orientation (within the bounds of those allowing a single setup) in which the angle between the neutral axis of the milling tool and the area-weighted mean normal to the part surface, at a “central” point with a normal in that mean direction, is zero, or as small as possible. To find this solution, Gaussian maps (GMap) of the part surfaces to be machined and the machining surface of the tool are applied. To our knowledge, we are the first [1] who have picked up this Gauss’ idea to sculptured part surface orientation problem and who have developed the general approach to solve this important engineering problem [2]. Later a similar approach was claimed by Gan [3]. By means of GMaps of these surfaces, the problem of optimal workpiece orientation can be formulated as a geometric problem on a sphere. The GMap on a unit sphere finds wide application for orientation of workpiece for NC machining, for probing on coordinate measuring machines, etc. GMaps are useful for selecting the type of cutting tool, its path, workpiece fixturing, and the type of NC machine (its kinematic capabilities). The primary process application addressed is 3- and 4-axis NC milling, although the techniques presented may be applied to machines with more general articulation. The influence of tool geometry is also discussed and incorporated within a constrained orientation algorithm. This paper covers the following topics: a) the derivation of the equations of the GMap of the part surface to be machined and the machining surface of the tool; b) calculation of the parameters of the weighted normal to the part surface; c) optimal part orientation on the table of a multi-axis NC machine; d) introduction of a new type of GMap for a sculptured part surface—its expanded$GMapE;$ and e) introduction of a new type of indicatrix of a sculptured part surface and a particular cutting tool–the indicatrix of machinability.

1.
Radzevich, S. P., 1987, The Method of Workpiece Optimal Orientation, Patent No. 1442371 (USSR), date of priority February 17.
2.
Radzevich, S. P., 1991, Sculptured Part Surfaces Multi-Axis NC Machining, Kiev, Vishcha Shkola Publishing House, p. 192, (In Russian).
3.
Gan, J. G., 1990, Spherical Algorithms for Setup Orientation of Workpiece With Sculptured Surfaces, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of IOE, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, p. 158.
4.
Chen
,
L.-L.
,
Chau
,
S.-Y.
, and
Woo
,
T. C.
,
1993
, “
Parting Directions for Mold and Die Design
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
25
(
12
), pp.
762
768
.
5.
Chen
,
L.-L.
,
Chou
,
S.-Y.
, and
Woo
,
T. C.
,
1993
, “
Separating and Intersecting Spherical Polygons; Computing Machinability on Three-, Four-, and Five-Axis Numerically Controlled Machines
,”
ACM Transactions on Graphics
,
12
(
4
), pp.
305
326
.
6.
Gan
,
J. G.
,
Woo
,
T. C.
, and
Tang
,
K.
,
1994
, “
Spherical Maps: Their Construction, Properties, and Approximation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
, pp.
357
363
.
7.
Haghpassand, K., 1994, Computational Geometry for Optimal Workpiece Orientation, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo.
8.
Haghpassand, K., and Oliver, J. H., 1991, “Computational Geometry for Optimal Workpiece Orientation,” Advances in Design Automation-1991, DE-Vol. 32-2, pp. 169–175. ASME Design Automation Conference, September 1991, New York.
9.
Haghpassand
,
K.
, and
Oliver
,
J. H.
,
1995
, “
Computational Geometry for Optimal Workpiece Orientation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
, p.
239
335
.
10.
Kang
,
J.-K.
, and
Suh
,
S.-H.
,
1997
, “
Machinability and Set-up Orientation for Five-axis Numerically Controlled Machining of Free Surfaces
,”
,
13
, pp.
311
325
.
11.
Gauss, K.-F., 1965, Disquisitions Generales Circa Superficies Curvas, Goettingen, 1828. [English translation: General Investigation of Curved Surfaces, by J. C. Moreheat and A. M. Hiltebeitel, Princeton, 1902, reprinted with introduction by Courant, Raven Press, Hewlett, New York, p. 119.
12.
Banchoff, T., Gaffney, T., and McCrory, C., 1982, Cusps of Gauss Mapping, Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston, London, Melbourne, p. 88.
13.
Chen
,
L.-L.
, and
Woo
,
T. C.
,
1992
, “
Computational Geometry on the Sphere With Application to Automated Machining
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
114
, pp.
288
295
.
14.
Tang
,
K.
,
Woo
,
T. C.
, and
Gan
,
J. G.
,
1992
, “
Maximum Intersection of Spherical Polygons and Workpiece Orientation for 4- and 5-axis Machining
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
114
, pp.
477
485
.
15.
Arni
,
R.
, and
Gupta
,
S. K.
,
2001
, “
Manufacturablity Analysis of Flatness Tolerances in Solid Freeform Fabrication
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
123
, pp.
148
156
.
16.
Onuh, S. O., and Hon, K. K., 1997 “Optimizing Build Parameters and Hatch Style for Part Accuracy in Stereolithography,” in the Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, August 11–13, pp. 653–660.
17.
Ramakrishna, A., 2000, “Web-Based Manufacturability Analysis for Solid Freeform Fabrication,” MS thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park.
18.
Rosen, D. W., Sambu, S. P., and West, A. P., 2001, “A Process Planning Method for Improving Build Performance in Stereolithography,” Comput.-Aided Des., (in press).
19.
Pududhai, N. S., and Dutta, D., 1994, “Determination of Optimal Orientation Based on Variable Slicing Thickness in Layered Manufacturing,” Technical Report UM-MEAM- 94-14. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
20.
Weinstein, M., and Manoochehri, S., 1996, “Geometric Influence of a Molded Part on the Draw Direction Range and Parting Line Locations,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 118.
21.
doCarmo, M. P., 1976. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Prentice-Hall, NY, p. 503.
22.
Paul, R. P., 1982, Robot Manipulators. Mathematics, Programming and Control, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, p. 279.
23.
Teicholz, E., 1985, CAD/CAM Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
24.
Kells, L. M., Kern, W. F., and Bland, J. R., 1951, Plane and Spherical Trigonometry, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, NY, p. 318
25.
Radzevich, S. P., 2001, Fundamentals of Part Surface Generating, p. 592 (In Russian).
26.
Radzevich, S. P., 2001, “Conditions of Proper Sculptured Part Surface Machining on Multi-Axis NC Machine,” Computer-Aided Design (in press).