Although Stewart platforms have been applied in the design of aircraft and vehicle simulators and parallel robots for many years, the closed-form solution of direct (forward) position analysis of Stewart platforms has not been completely solved. Up to the present time, only the relatively simple Stewart platforms have been analyzed. Examples are the octahedral, the 3–6 and the 4–4 Stewart platforms, of which the forward position solutions were derived as an eighth or a twelfth degree polynomials with one variable in the form of square of a tan-half-angle. This paper further extends the direct position analysis to a more general case of the Stewart platform, the 4–6 Stewart platforms, in which two pairs of the upper joint centers of adjacent limbs are coincident. The result is a sixteenth degree polynomial in the square of a tan-half-angle, which indicates that a maximum of 32 configurations may be obtained. It is also shown that the previously derived solutions of the 3–6 and 4–4 Stewart platforms can be easily deduced from the sixteenth degree polynomial by setting some geometric parameters be equal to 1 or 0.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1994
Research Papers
Direct Position Analysis of the 4–6 Stewart Platforms
Ning-Xin Chen,
Ning-Xin Chen
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60680
Search for other works by this author on:
Shin-Min Song
Shin-Min Song
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60680
Search for other works by this author on:
Ning-Xin Chen
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60680
Shin-Min Song
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60680
J. Mech. Des. Mar 1994, 116(1): 61-66 (6 pages)
Published Online: March 1, 1994
Article history
Received:
June 1, 1992
Online:
June 2, 2008
Citation
Chen, N., and Song, S. (March 1, 1994). "Direct Position Analysis of the 4–6 Stewart Platforms." ASME. J. Mech. Des. March 1994; 116(1): 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2919377
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Forward Position Analysis of the 3-DOF Module of the TriVariant: A 5-DOF Reconfigurable Hybrid Robot
J. Mech. Des (January,2006)
Impact of Component Sizing in Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles for Energy Resource and Greenhouse Emissions Reduction
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December,2013)
Discussion of “A Review of Propulsion, Power, and Control Architectures for Insect-Scale Flapping Wing Vehicles” by E. F. Helbling and R. J. Wood (Helbling, E. F., and Wood, R. J., 2018, ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 70(1), p. 010801)
Appl. Mech. Rev (January,2018)
The Great Out of the Small
Mechanical Engineering (November,2000)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Practical Applications
Robust Control: Youla Parameterization Approach
The Tricycle Robot: A Mobile Programmable ‘Drive-by-Wire’ Electric Vehicle
Precision Programming of Roving Robots: Project-Based Fundamentals of Wheeled, Legged and Hybrid Mobile Robots
Programming of Walking Legs, their Leg Tip Motion and the Leg Tip Digital Locus
Precision Programming of Roving Robots: Project-Based Fundamentals of Wheeled, Legged and Hybrid Mobile Robots