In recent years, simulation tools have proven valuable for the prediction of machining state variables over a wide range of operating parameters. Such simulation packages, however, are seldom an integral part of machining parameter optimization modules. This paper proposes a methodology for incorporating simulation feedback to fine-tune analytic models during the optimization process. Through a limited number of calls to the computationally expensive simulation tools, process parameters may be generated that satisfy the design constraints within the accuracy of the simulation predictions, while providing an efficient balance among parameters arising from the functional form of the optimization model. The following iterative algorithm is presented: (i) a non-linear programming (NLP) optimization technique is used to select process parameters based on closed-form analytical constraint equations relating to critical design requirements, (ii) the simulation is executed using these process parameters, providing predictions of the critical state variables. (iii) Constraint equation parameters are dynamically adapted using the feedback provided by the simulation predictions. This sequence is repeated until local convergence between the simulation and constraint equation predictions has been achieved. A case study in machining parameter optimization for peripheral finish milling operations is developed in which constraints on the allowable form error,Δ and the peripheral surface roughness, Ra, drive the process parameter selection for a cutting operation intended to maximize the material removal rate. Results from twenty machining scenarios are presented, including five workpiece/tool material combinations at four levels of precision. Achieving agreement (within a 5% deviation tolerance) between the simulation and constraint equation predictions required an average of 5 simulation execution cycles (maximum of 8), demonstrating promise that simulation tools can be efficiently incorporated into parameter optimization processes.

1.
Taylor
F. W.
, “
On the Art of Cutting Metals
,”
Transactions of the ASME
,
28
,
1907
,
31
31
.
2.
Wright, P. K., and Bourne, D. A., Manufacturing Intelligence, Addison-Wesley, 1988.
3.
Chen, Y. Y., and Thompson, W., “A Survey of Expert Systems in Process Planning and Machining Operation Planning,” Trans. of the Institute of Eng., Australia, Mech. Eng., Vol. ME 16, No. 4, 1991.
4.
Gupta, T., and Ghosh, B. K., “A Survey of Expert Systems in Manufacturing and Process Planning,” Computer in Industry, Nov. 1988, pp. 195–204.
5.
Pham
D. T.
, and
Pham
P. T.
, “
Expert Systems in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
,”
Int. V. Adv. Manuf. Tech.
, Vol.
3
, No.
3
,
1988
, pp.
3
21
.
6.
Chang, T. C., and Wysk, R. A., An Introduction to Automated Process Planning Systems, Prentice-Hall, 1985.
7.
Metcut Research Associates, Machining Data Handbook, 3rd Edn, 1980.
8.
Balakrishnan, P., and DeVries, M. F., “A Review of Computerized Machinability Data Base Systems,” Tenth NAMRC Proceedings, 1982, pp. 348–356.
9.
Barkocy, B. E., and Zdeblick, W. J., “A Knowledge-Based System for Machining Operation Planning,” Autofact 6, 1984. pp. 2.11–2.25.
10.
Agapiou
J. S.
, “
The Optimization of Machining Operations Based on a Combined Criterion, Part 1: The Use of Combined Objectives in Single-Pass Operations
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
114
,
1992
, pp.
500
513
.
11.
Agapiou
J. S.
, “
The Optimization of Machining Operations Based on a Combined Criterion, Part 2: The Algorithm and Applications
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
114
,
1992
, pp.
524
538
.
12.
Hitomi
K.
, “
Analysis of Optimal Machining Speeds for Automatic Manufacturing
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
, Vol.
27
,
1989
, pp.
1685
1691
.
13.
Tan
F. P.
, and
Creese
R. C.
, “
A Generalized Multi-Pass Machining Model for Machining Parameter Selection in Turning
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
, Vol.
33
, No.
5
,
1995
, pp.
1467
1487
.
14.
Koulams
C. P.
, “
Simultaneous Determination of Optimal Machining Conditions and Tool Replacement Policies in Constrained Machining Economics Problem by Geometric Programming
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
, Vol.
29
, No.
12
,
1991
, pp.
2407
2421
.
15.
Jha
N. K.
, “
A Discrete Data Base Multiple Objective Optimization of Milling Operation Through Geometric Programming
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
112
, Nov.
1990
, p.
368
368
.
16.
Chryssolouris
G.
, and
Guillot
M.
, “
A Comparison of Statistical and AI Approaches to the Selection of Process Parameters in Intelligent Machining
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
112
, May.
1990
, p.
122
122
.
17.
Devor, R. E., Kline, W. A., and Zdeblick, W. J., “A Mechanistic Model for the Force System in End Milling with Application to Machining Airframe Structures,” Eight North American Manufacturing Research Conference Proceedings, May 1980, p. 297.
18.
Kline
W. A.
,
DeVor
R. E.
, and
Lindberg
J. R.
, “
The Prediction of Cutting Forces in End Milling with Application to Cornering Cuts
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res.
, Vol.
22
, No.
1
, pp.
7
22
,
1982
.
19.
Kline
W. A.
,
DeVor
R. E.
, and
Shareef
I. A.
, “
The Prediction of Surface Accuracy in End Milling
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
104
, Aug.
1982
, p.
272
272
.
20.
Kline
W. A.
, and
DeVor
R. E.
, “
The Effect of Runout on Cutting Geometry and Forces in End Milling
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res.
, Vol.
23
, No.
2/3
. pp.
123
140
.
1983
.
21.
Sutherland
J. W.
, and
DeVor
R. E.
, “
An Improved Method for Cutting Force and Surface Error Prediction in Flexible End Milling Systems
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
108
, Nov.
1986
, p.
269
269
.
22.
Martelotti
M. E.
, “
An Analysis of the Milling Process
,”
Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs.
, Vol.
63
, p.
667
667
,
1941
.
23.
Martelotti
M. E.
, “
An Analysis of the Milling Process: Part II-Down Milling
,”
Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs.
, Vol.
67
, p.
233
233
,
1945
.
24.
Sabberwal, A. J. P., “Chip Section and Cutting Force During the Milling Operation,” Ann. CIRP, Vol. 10, 1961/1962.
25.
Kops
L.
, and
Vo
D. T.
, “
Determination of the Equivalent Diameter of and End Mill Based on its Compliance
,”
Annals of CIRP
, Vol.
39
/
1
/
1990
p.
93
93
.
26.
Boothroyd, G., and Knight, W. A., Fundamentals of Machining and Machine Tools, 2nd. ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1989.
27.
Shaw, M. C., Metal Cutting Principles, Oxford University Press, 1984.
28.
DeVries, W. R., Analysis of Material Removal Processes, Springer-Verlag, 1992.
29.
Grove, A., Optimization Toolbox for Use with MATLABTM, The Mathworks, Inc., 1990.
30.
Luenberger, D. G., Linear and Nonlinear Programming, 2nd. ed., Addison-Wesley, 1989.
31.
http://mtamri.me.uiuc.edu/software.testbed.html
32.
http://slice.me.uiuc.edu/~venkat/emserv/emserv.html
33.
Babin, T. S., “The Modeling, Characterization, and Assessment of End Milled Surfaces,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1988.
34.
Babin, T. S., Lee, J. M., Sutherland, J. W., and Kapoor, S. G., 1985, “A Model for End Milled Surface Topography,” Proceedings 13th North American Manufacturing Research Conference, pp. 362–368.
35.
Melkote, S. N., “The Modelling of Surface Texture in the End Milling Process,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 1993.
36.
Melkote
S. N.
, and
Thangaraj
A. R.
, “
An Enhanced End Milling Surface Texture Model Including the Effects of Radial Rake and Primary Relief Angles
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
116
, May.
1994
, p.
166
166
.
37.
Stark
G. A.
, and
Thangaraj
A. R.
, “
A 3-D Surface Texture Model for Peripheral Milling with Cutter Runout Using Neural Network Modules and Splines
,”
Trans. North American Manufacturing Research Institution of SME
, Vol.
24
, pp.
57
62
,
1996
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.