In thermosetting composite manufacturing, part thickness, mold temperature, pressure, and resin kinetics can affect the uniformity of cure in the finished part. If the interaction of these parameters is not accounted for, then unwanted overshoot of the processing temperature can occur within a part during cure. In this paper, the relationship between processing and material parameters was considered to establish a critical thickness separating parts having large overshoots from parts having small overshoots. The one-dimensional heat equation with an autocatalytic relation for curing was used to model the process. The equations were placed in dimensionless form using a scaling analysis. A finite difference model was also created to calculate part temperatures during cure as a function of the key dimensionless groups. For experimental validation, composite plates of varying thickness were fabricated from a glass fiber prepreg material, and the processing conditions were varied according to thickness. The scaling analysis identified five dimensionless groups. Two of these groups were found to affect the overshoot of the temperature: the modified Damköhler number $Da∗$, which includes the heat generated during the reaction, and the dimensionless temperature ramp rate $t¯rise$, which describes the tooling temperature ramp rate relative to the natural time scale of the heat transfer. There was good agreement between the numerical model prediction of temperature overshoot and the experimental data. The results also confirm that the behavior of thin and thick parts, as defined by the relative temperature overshoot, can be well defined and predicted by the two proposed dimensionless groups: $Da∗$ and $t¯rise$.

1.
Parthasarathy
,
S.
,
Mantell
,
S. C.
, and
Stelson
,
K. A.
, 2004, “
Estimation, Control and Optimization of Curing in Thick-Sectioned Composite Parts
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
126
, pp.
824
833
.
2.
Shin
,
D. D.
, and
Hahn
,
H. T.
, 2004, “
Compaction of Thick Composites: Simulation and Experiment
,”
Polym. Compos.
0272-8397,
25
(
1
), pp.
49
59
.
3.
Guo
,
Z.
,
Du
,
S.
, and
Zhang
,
B.
, 2005, “
Temperature Field of Thick Thermoset Composite Laminates During Cure Process
,”
Compos. Sci. Technol.
0266-3538,
65
, pp.
517
523
.
4.
Jiang
,
Y.
, and
Hoa
,
S. V.
, 2006, “
A Novel Method for the Manufacturing of Thick Composites
,”
J. Compos. Mater.
0021-9983,
40
(
5
), pp.
433
453
.
5.
Kline
,
S. J.
, 1965,
Similitude and Approximation Theory
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
6.
Danzig
,
J. A.
, and
Tucker
,
C. L.
, III
, 2001,
Modeling in Materials Processing
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
7.
Pitchumani
,
R.
, and
Yao
,
S.
, 1993, “
Non-Dimensional Analysis of an Idealized Thermoset Composites Manufacture
,”
J. Compos. Mater.
0021-9983,
27
(
6
), pp.
613
636
.
8.
Perry
,
M. J.
,
Lee
,
L. J.
, and
Lee
,
C. W.
, 1992, “
On-Line Cure Monitoring of Epoxy/Graphite Composites Using a Scaling Analysis and a Dual Heat Flux Sensor
,”
J. Compos. Mater.
0021-9983,
26
(
2
), pp.
274
292
.
9.
Li
,
M.
,
Zhu
,
Q.
,
Geubelle
,
P. H.
, and
Tucker
,
C. L.
, III
, 2001, “
Optimal Curing for Thermoset Matrix Composites: Thermochemical Considerations
,”
Polym. Compos.
0272-8397,
22
(
1
), pp.
118
131
.
10.
Gorovaya
,
T. A.
, and
Korotkov
,
V. N.
, 1996, “
Quick Cure of Thermosetting Composites
,”
Composites, Part A
1359-835X,
27
(
10
), pp.
953
960
.
11.
Udaykumar
,
H. S.
, and
Shyy
,
W.
, 1993, “
Modeling Solidification Processes at Morphological Scales
,”
Advanced Computations in Materials Processing, Proceedings of the ASME Heat Transfer Division
, Vol.
241
, pp.
23
31
.
12.
Nam
,
J. D.
, and
Seferis
,
J. C.
, 1993, “
Application of the Kinetic Composite Methodology to Autocatalytic-Type Thermoset Prepreg Cures
,”
J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
0021-8995,
50
, pp.
1555
1564
.
13.
Gebart
,
B. R.
, 1994, “
Critical Parameters for Heat Transfer and Chemical Reactions in Thermosetting Materials
,”
J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
0021-8995,
51
(
1
), pp.
153
168
.