The ray effect is a serious problem in radiative heat transfer computations. Continuously varying radiation fields are approximated numerically by sampling a limited number of angular directions. The discrete transfer method (DTM) is a conceptually simple technique suitable for general-purpose calculations of thermal radiation in complex geometries. Over the years a large variety of quadratures based on fixed ray firing patterns has been suggested for use in conjunction with the DTM. Arguably, in absence of a comprehensive error analysis, the efficacy of all these quadratures has only been proved for limited collections of radiation problems. Recently, sharp error bounds for the heat flux integral in the DTM have been established for irradiation distributions of three different continuity classes: smooth fields, fields with discontinuous angular derivatives and piecewise constant fields. The resulting error formulas have paved the way for a new adaptive quadrature strategy. Results are presented of its application to an idealized jet flame and to radiative exchanges inside a cube-shaped enclosure, along with brief comments on the viability of this approach in general-purpose CFD/radiation computations. In this paper, the following capabilities of the new adaptive angular quadrature are demonstrated: Evaluation of DTM heat flux integrals to a pre-specified tolerance for any intensity distribution; Excellent accuracy with very low ray numbers for irradiation due to small view factor sources; and Good heat flux estimates for piecewise constant sources, provided that the starting mesh is selected carefully.

1.
Shah, N. G., 1979, “New Method for the Computation of Radiation Heat Transfer in Combustion Chambers,” Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.
2.
Pessoa-Filho
,
J. B.
, and
Thynell
,
S. T.
,
1997
, “
An Approximate Solution to the Radiative Transfer in Two-Dimensional Rectangular Enclosures
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
119
(
4
), pp.
738
745
.
3.
Lockwood, F. C., and Shah, N. G., 1981, “A New Radiation Solution Method for Incorporation in General Combustion Prediction Procedures,” Proc. Eighteenth Symp. (Int.) Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 1405–1413.
4.
Cumber
,
P. S.
,
1995
, “
Improvements to the Discrete Transfer Method of Calculating Radiative Heat Transfer
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
38
(
12
), pp.
2251
2258
.
5.
Andersen
,
F. M. B.
,
1996
, “
Comparison of Numerical Quadrature Schemes Applied in the Method of Discrete Transfer
,”
J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer
,
10
(
3
), pp.
549
551
.
6.
Li
,
B.-W.
,
Tao
,
W.-Q.
, and
Liu
,
R.-X.
,
1997
, “
Ray Effect in Ray Tracing for Radiative Heat Transfer
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
40
(
14
), pp.
3419
3426
.
7.
Bressloff, N. W., Moss, J. B., and Rubini, P. A., 1999, “Application of a New Weighting Set for the Discrete Transfer Method,” Proc. 3rd European Conf. Industrial Furnaces and Boilers, 18–21 April 1999, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 208–215.
8.
Cumber
,
P. S.
,
2000
, “
Ray Effect Mitigation in Jet Fire Radiation Modelling
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
43
(
6
), pp.
935
943
.
9.
Versteeg
,
H. K.
,
Henson
,
J. C.
, and
Malalasekera
,
W. M. G.
,
1999
, “
Approximation Errors in the Heat Flux Integral of the Discrete Transfer Method. Part 1: Transparent Media
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B
,
36
, Pt. 4, pp.
387
407
.
10.
Versteeg
,
H. K.
,
Henson
,
J. C.
, and
Malalasekera
,
W. M. G.
,
1999
, “
Approximation Errors in the Heat Flux Integral of the Discrete Transfer Method. Part 2: Participating Media
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B
,
36
, Pt. 4, pp.
409
432
.
11.
Hsu
,
P.-F.
, and
Farmer
,
J. T.
, 1995, “Benchmark Solutions of Radiative Heat Transfer Within Nonhomogeneous Participating Media Using the Monte Carlo and YIX Methods,” ASME HTD-315, 13, ASME, New York, pp. 29–36.
You do not currently have access to this content.