The dynamics of valve train is influenced by stiffness, size, and mass distribution of its components and initial valve clearance and so on. All the factors should be taken into consideration correctly by dynamic model and described qualitatively and quantitatively through mathematical variables. This paper proposes a new simplified method for valve train components, namely, mode matching method (MMM) for camshaft, pushrod, rocker arm, valve, and valve spring. In this method, the amount of lumped masses for each flexible component is determined based on its natural frequencies and the considered frequency range. As a result, the dynamic model of each component is required to match its low order modes within the considered frequency range. The basis of this method is that the contributions of each component to valve train vibration are mainly in the low order modes. The numerical model of valve train is verified by an experiment conducted on a motor driven valve train system.

References

1.
Barkan
,
P.
,
1953
, “
Calculation of High-Speed Valve Motion With a Flexible Overhead Linkage
,”
SAE
Technical Paper No. 530261.10.4271/530261
2.
Dresner
,
T. L.
, and
Barkan
,
P.
,
1995
, “
New Methods for the Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Single-Input and Multi-Input Cam-Follower Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
(
1
), pp.
150
155
.10.1115/1.2826100
3.
Seidlitz
,
S.
,
1989
, “
Valve Train Dynamics—A Computer Study
,”
SAE
Paper No. 890620.10.4271/890620
4.
Frendo
,
F.
,
Vitale
,
E.
,
Carmignani
,
L.
,
Gagliardi
,
D.
, and
Matteucci
,
L.
,
2004
, “
Development of a Lumped-Parameter Model for the Dynamic Analysis of Valve Train Systems
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2004-32-0051.10.4271/2004-32-0051
5.
Kim
,
D.
, and
David
,
J. W.
,
1990
, “
A Combined Model for High Speed Valve Train Dynamics
,”
SAE
Paper No. 901726.10.4271/901726
6.
Pisano
,
A. P.
, and
Freudenstein
,
F.
,
1983
, “
An Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Dynamic Response of a High-Speed Cam-Follower System, Part 2: A Combined, Lumped/Distributed Parameter Dynamic Model
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
105
(
4
), pp.
699
704
.10.1115/1.3258539
7.
Lee
,
J.
, and
Patterson
,
D. J.
,
1997
, “
Nonlinear Valve Train Dynamics Simulation With a Distributed Parameter Model of Valve Springs
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
119
(
7
), pp.
692
698
.10.1115/1.2817043
8.
Guo
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
W. P.
, and
Zou
,
D. Q.
,
2011
, “
Investigation of Dynamic Characteristics of a Valve Train System
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
46
(
12
), pp.
1950
1969
.10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.07.014
9.
Özgür
,
K.
, and
Pasin
,
F.
,
1996
, “
Separation Phenomena in Force Closed Cam Mechanisms
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
31
(
4
), pp.
487
499
.10.1016/0094-114X(95)00086-E
10.
Guo
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
W. P.
, and
Zou
,
D. Q.
,
2012
, “
Development and Validation of a Rigid-Flexible Coupled Dynamic Valve-Train Model
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D
,
226
, pp.
94
111
.10.1177/0954407011413973
11.
Teodorescu
,
M.
,
Kushwaha
,
M.
,
Rahnejat
,
H.
, and
Taraza
,
D.
,
2005
, “
Elastodynamic Transient Analysis of a Four-Cylinder Valve Train System With Camshaft Flexibility
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part K
,
219
(
1
), pp.
13
25
.10.1243/146441905X9962
12.
Iritani
,
T.
,
Shozaki
,
A.
,
Sheng
,
B.
,
Sugimoto
,
M.
,
Okazaki
,
T.
, and
Aketa
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Prediction of the Dynamic Characteristics in Valve Train Design of a Diesel Engine
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2002-32-1839.10.4271/2002-32-1839
13.
Teodorescu
,
M.
,
Taraza
,
D.
, and
Naeim
,
A. H.
,
2003
, “
Simplified Elasto-Hydrodynamic Friction Model of the Cam-Tappet Contact
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2003-01-0985.10.4271/2003-01-0985
14.
Yang
,
L. S.
,
Akemi
,
I.
, and
Hideo
,
N.
,
1996
, “
A Valve Train Friction and Lubrication Analysis Model and Its Application in a Cam/Tappet Wear Study
,”
SAE
Paper No. 962030.10.4271/96203010.4271/962030
You do not currently have access to this content.