Gas turbine engine secondary flow systems are sensitive to variation in part dimensions, clearances, flow coefficients, swirl ratios, head loss factors, tolerances, boundary conditions, etc. This paper reveals a process and software application, which embodies the process, wherein both offer a measurable contribution to secondary airflow system reliability. The probabilistic methodology is empirically validated by (1) applying it to an engine component that failed in a validation test and (2) demonstrating that a multiple order sensitivity analysis performed during detailed design was unable to detect a failure mode while a probabilistic analysis revealed a small yet significant risk of failure. Therefore, a secondary flow analyst does not have a justifiable reason to be highly confident of a design qualified by a first, second, or higher order sensitivity analysis. The last example empirically demonstrates the compatibility of optimization techniques with probabilistic methods (as part of the process) to quantify the likelihood of failure and reveal an optimized design space of key characteristics, where risk is eliminated and the effects of variation are controlled. Trade study analysis is more valuable if it includes a quantitative evaluation of the effects of variation on alternate designs and the response to failure modes. A key feature of the software application is a relational database with the capability to configure and effectively manage flow networks in many forms including a status model, failure modes of the status model, multiple alternative designs, as well as failure modes specific to an alternative design.

1.
Isukapalli
,
S.
, 1999, “
Uncertainty Analysis of Transport-Transformation Models
,” Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
2.
Wu
,
Y. -T.
, and
Wirsching
,
P. H.
, 1987, “
A New Algorithm for Structural Reliability Estimation
,”
J. Engrg. Mech. Div.
0044-7951,
113
(
9
), pp.
1319
1336
.
3.
MirzaMoghadam
,
A. V.
, and
Beohm
,
B. J.
, 1991, “
Probabilistic Thermal Design of a Rocket Chamber Wall Cooling System
,”
ASME/JSME Thermal Engineering Proceedings
, Vol.
5
.
4.
Cloud
,
D.
, and
Stearns
,
E.
, 2004, “
Probabilistic Analysis of a Turbofan Secondary Flow System
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53197.
5.
Stearns
,
E.
,
Cloud
,
D.
, and
Filburn
,
T.
, 2006, “
Probabilistic Thermal Analysis of Gas Turbine Internal Hardware
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90881.
6.
Cooke
,
A.
,
Childs
,
P.
, and
Long
,
C.
, 2007, “
Investigation Into the Effect of Uncertainty in Thermal Properties on Turbomachinery Disc Heat Transfer Using Both a Monte Carlo Simulation Technique and a Taylor Series Uncertainty Propagation Method
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27573.
7.
Bischoff
,
T.
,
Voigt
,
M.
,
Chehab
,
E.
, and
Vogeler
,
K.
, 2006, “
Probabilistic Analysis of Stationary Gas Turbine Secondary Air Systems
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90261.
8.
Faron
,
G.
,
Pagerit
,
S.
, and
Rousseau
,
A.
, 2009, “
Evaluation of PHEVS Fuel Efficiency and Cost Using Monte Carlo Analysis
,”
EVS 24 Conference
, Argonne National Laboratory, Stavanger, Norway.
You do not currently have access to this content.